debug-issue
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Systematically debug issues using graph-powered code navigation
17 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- marinvch/Cortextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- rumotion/ai-agent-project-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- NVIDIA/kumo-enginetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- ashvin-to/BaseMemtheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- rikilamadrid/lorekeepertheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Arasz/ai-badgertheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use refactor-code, reverse-engineer and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
zbruhnkeSkillrefactor-code
Refactor code to improve clarity and maintainability without changing behavior. Use when improving readability, reducing complexity, or eliminating duplication.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillreverse-engineer
Expert reverse engineer specializing in binary analysis,
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillcreate-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
Also in 4 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillsecurity-audit
Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- tirth8205/code-review-graph★ 33k25% same
- exactbee/claude-code-workflow★ 178% same
Wrote their own version · 15
- glowingkitty/OpenMates★ 53same name
- NVIDIA/kumo-engine★ 50same name
- samirpatil2000/skills★ 17same name
- emaraschio/cursor-commands★ 9same name
- phmatray/ai-migration-kit★ 4same name
- phmatray/tagout★ 4same name
- Arasz/ai-badger★ 3same name
- ashvin-to/BaseMem★ 1same name
- fabianmagrini/skills★ 1same name
- marinvch/Cortex★ 1same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/improve/agents/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/use-chatgpt/agents/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- explore-codebaseSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- review-changesSkill
- building-gtd-domain-packsSkill
- get-things-doneSkill
- gtd-capability-routerSkill
- gtd-deliberationSkill
- improveSkill
- reaSkill
- use-chatgptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use the knowledge graph to systematically trace and debug issues.
- Very specific: line 12
Use semantic_search_nodes_tool to find code related to the issue.
- Very specific: line 13
Use query_graph_tool with callers_of and callees_of to trace call chains.
- Very specific: line 14
Use get_flow_tool to see full execution paths through suspected areas.
- Very specific: line 15
Run detect_changes_tool to check if recent changes caused the issue.
- Very specific: line 16
Use get_impact_radius_tool on suspected files to see what else is affected.
- Distinctive: line 20
Check both callers and callees to understand the full context.
- Distinctive: line 21
Look at affected flows to find the entry point that triggers the bug.
- Very specific: line 25
Start with get_minimal_context_tool(task="<your task>") before other graph tools.
- Very specific: line 26
Use detail_level="minimal" on all calls.
- Distinctive: line 28
Read the implementation and its tests before changing code.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Debug Issue
Use the knowledge graph to systematically trace and debug issues.
Steps
- Use
semantic_search_nodes_toolto find code related to the issue. - Use
query_graph_toolwithcallers_ofandcallees_ofto trace call chains. - Use
get_flow_toolto see full execution paths through suspected areas. - Run
detect_changes_toolto check if recent changes caused the issue. - Use
get_impact_radius_toolon suspected files to see what else is affected.
Tips
- Check both callers and callees to understand the full context.
- Look at affected flows to find the entry point that triggers the bug.
- Recent changes are the most common source of new issues.
Token Efficiency Rules
- Start with
get_minimal_context_tool(task="<your task>")before other graph tools. - Use
detail_level="minimal"on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient. - Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
- Read the implementation and its tests before changing code. The graph narrows scope; it does not replace the source.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

