mvp-prototype
Skill249 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use in MVP mode (/superlite:mvp), after the .mvp.md feature plan is written, to make the one-file clickable prototype, check it, and read the user's feedback before the agent-format plan is written.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- commands/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/feature-worktrees.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/no-cursor-commit-notes.mdcCursor rule
- diagnosisSkill
- draftingSkill
- feature-prototypeSkill
- inventingSkill
- proofSkill
- shippingSkill
- swarmSkill
- testingSkill
- using-superliteSkill
- writing-specsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Write only the main area as an HTML fragment, .superlite/mvp/mock.html, in the style for the target from mock-patterns.md.
- Very specific: line 47
Every element a feature adds carries data-feature="F2" (several ids: data-feature="F2 F4", hidden if any is cut).
- Very specific: line 91
Delete .superlite/mvp/ unless the target includes web and the feedback says keep_as_frontend: true.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
MVP prototype
One self-contained page, .superlite/mvp/prototype.html: raw HTML and JS, no build step, no network, fake data. It is a spec
for behavior, not product code. Design: docs/mvp-flow.md. Tools: superlite-cli mvp_check (see below).
1. The plan the page is built from
docs/plans/<date>-<topic>.mvp.md opens with the usage diagram, then **Target:** (web, cli, library, api, other;
combined as web, api), optionally **Estimate:** 30-45 min, $4-7, then one heading per feature, which mvp_check parses:
### F1: Create a note
- **Gets:** a note saved in one step
- **Use:** type, press Enter
- **Depends:** none
- **Size:** S
- **Priority:** must
- **Recommend:** in - the core of the productFeatures considered and left out go under ## Left out as plain bullets, with no F id.
2. Write the mock, not the page
Write only the main area as an HTML fragment, .superlite/mvp/mock.html, in the style for the target from
mock-patterns.md. Then:
bash <skill-dir>/../swarm/scripts/superlite-cli mvp_check build --plan docs/plans/<date>-<topic>.mvp.md --mock .superlite/mvp/mock.htmlbuild fills page-template.html (side panel, footer, save logic) with the plan's features and your mock,
stamps the page's sha, and checks it; it does not open it. Do not copy or rewrite the template by hand.
Show the page to the user; how is your choice, by what your harness offers: an in-IDE view (in the Claude desktop
app, send the page as a file with display render), a browser tool you can drive, or superlite-cli mvp_check open for the default
browser. In a headless run, skip it. If the view cannot save files, Save feedback falls back to a download, and Copy
feedback to the clipboard.
Mock rules:
- Every element a feature adds carries
data-feature="F2"(several ids:data-feature="F2 F4", hidden if any is cut). Every feature appears at least once. Cutting it in the panel hides those elements. data-screen="S1" data-title="Note list"marks a screen (web: one shown at a time),data-go="S2"navigates on click,data-editmarks a label the user may retype (never on the same element asdata-go).data-sl-orderon a container reorders itsdata-featurechildren with the panel's order.- Fake data inline. No
http://orhttps://anywhere (writeapi.example/notesor/notes), nofetch, no CDN, no fonts.
3. Check
superlite-cli mvp_check check --plan <mvp.md> must print mvp_check: ok. It checks: the page parses and its structural tags close,
the panel's data matches the plan, every feature id is in the mock, no external URLs or network calls, and (when the feedback
file exists) the feedback schema, its features against the plan, and its prototype_sha against the page. Fix the mock or the
plan, then build again. After any hand edit of the page run superlite-cli mvp_check stamp.
In either orchestrator mode, when open_in_harness is on (superlite-cli agent_specs status), open the .mvp.md for the user
(superlite:drafting, After writing); do not wait on it.
4. Human orchestrator
Show the path, a five-line summary (goal, target, features in, features out, rough time and cost) and: open the page, cut or
reorder features, edit labels, leave notes, press Save feedback, then reply in chat. END THE TURN. The chat reply
approves, never the file. If you understand that reply as approval, send approve: superlite-cli orchestrator approve --review docs/plans/<date>-<topic>.mvp.md, then
superlite-cli mvp_check fetch (the project file, else the newest mvp-feedback*.json in Downloads, copied in; if none, ask the user to
paste the Copy feedback block and save it yourself to .superlite/mvp/mvp-feedback.json), then
superlite-cli mvp_check check --plan <mvp.md> --require-feedback. A sha mismatch means the file came from an older page: ask once for a
fresh save. From here on the human is not asked again: a scope change is a Ruling: [scope] ... line, listed by superlite-cli finish under
"Changed from the approved plan".
5. AI orchestrator (self-check, no stop)
superlite-cli mvp_check check --plan <mvp.md> until ok, then superlite-cli mvp_check ai --plan <mvp.md> writes the feedback with source: "ai",
every feature as the plan recommends, and no edits. Log Ruling: MVP scope taken as the plan recommends - AI orchestrator -
cost if wrong: a feature rebuilt later. No approve.
6. Feedback into the agent-format plan
Schema and rules: feedback-schema.md. in: false features go to "Out of scope"; kept features become tasks
in order, each keeping its F id as the trace id; added entries become features marked "unreviewed"; label edits change
the FROZEN names; screens and click paths become FROZEN interfaces and CHAINs; fake data becomes EXAMPLE blocks. Write
docs/plans/<date>-<topic>.md with **Review plan:** docs/plans/<date>-<topic>.mvp.md, then lint --stable. If lint fails,
fix the plan, never the feedback.
7. At finish
Delete .superlite/mvp/ unless the target includes web and the feedback says keep_as_frontend: true; then the page is the
first producer task's starting file, converted to the plan's framework by that task.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

