agentleFS
iamcaominhtieniamcaominhtien/kanban-board-mcp/.github/skills/setup-copilot/SKILL.md

setup-copilot

Skill1 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Setup GitHub Copilot instructions for a project. Use when: initializing copilot for a new repo, generating or updating .github/copilot-instructions.md, personalizing how Copilot responds, capturing project role/stack/conventions once to avoid repeating them every chat. Triggers: "setup copilot", "initialize copilot", "create copilot instructions", "update copilot instructions", "configure copilot", "personalize copilot", "build copilot-instructions.md", "help Copilot understand my project".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run a broad, parallel scan to collect signals about the project.

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT add linter-enforced conventions (Copilot cannot override tooling anyway)

    line 72
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep total file under ~150 lines

    line 73
  4. Very specific:

    Write the generated content to .github/copilot-instructions.md.

    line 127
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask: *"Does this look right?

    line 129
  6. Distinctive:

    After the file is confirmed, suggest relevant follow-ups:

    line 136

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Setup Copilot Instructions

Builds or regenerates .github/copilot-instructions.md — the persistent context file that shapes how GitHub Copilot responds across every chat in this workspace.

What It Produces

A copilot-instructions.md that captures:

  • Role & stack — what kind of project this is and what the agent should behave like
  • Architecture — key components, layers, service boundaries
  • Build & test commands — so agents can run them without asking
  • Conventions — patterns that differ from defaults (naming, error handling, logging, etc.)
  • Key doc links — pointers to deeper docs instead of duplicating content

Procedure

Step 1 — Scan the Repo

Run a broad, parallel scan to collect signals about the project. Look for:

SignalWhere to look
Language / runtimepackage.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, *.csproj, Gemfile, pom.xml, build.gradle
FrameworkImports in entry-point files, config files (next.config.*, vite.config.*, fastapi, django, rails)
ArchitectureFolder structure, src/, app/, services/, packages/, monorepo markers
Build / test commandsMakefile, scripts field in package.json, CI config (.github/workflows/*.yml, Jenkinsfile)
Coding conventionseslint.config.*, .prettierrc, pyproject.toml [tool.ruff], CONTRIBUTING.md
Existing docsREADME.md, docs/, ADR-*.md
Existing instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/AGENTS.md

Note: Always ignore the .github/ folder during scanning — it contains default Copilot/agent setup boilerplate that is not specific to the project being set up.

If the repo is essentially empty (no code files, no config outside .github/, only .git/) → skip to Step 2 (Empty Repo). If the repo has content → skip to Step 3 (Generate).


Step 2 — Empty Repo Interview

The project is new. Ask the user these questions (can ask all at once):

I can see this repo is empty. To build useful Copilot instructions I need a bit of context:

1. What are you building? (e.g. REST API, web app, CLI tool, mobile app, data pipeline)
2. What language(s) and framework(s) are you planning to use?
3. What's your role on this project? (solo dev, tech lead, full-stack, backend, etc.)
4. Any strong preferences? (e.g. functional over OOP, strict typing, test-first, specific patterns)
5. Are there any agent tools or MCP integrations planned? (e.g. GitHub, databases, Jira)
6. Will this be a team repo shared with others, or personal?

Collect answers, then proceed to Step 3.


Step 3 — Generate copilot-instructions.md

Using the signals from Step 1 or answers from Step 2, compose the file following these rules:

Rules:

  • Include only sections that are meaningful for THIS project
  • Be concise and actionable — every line should guide behavior, not describe what the project does
  • Link to existing docs (See docs/TESTING.md) instead of duplicating them
  • Do NOT add linter-enforced conventions (Copilot cannot override tooling anyway)
  • Keep total file under ~150 lines

Use this structure (omit sections that don't apply):

# Project: <name>

## Role
<Describe what role the agent should adopt — e.g. "You are a senior backend engineer on a FastAPI service." This should reflect the user's own role and expectations.>

## Tech Stack
- Language: <...>
- Framework: <...>
- Runtime / infra: <...>
- Key libraries: <...>

## Architecture
<2–5 bullet points describing major layers, service boundaries, or module layout. Focus on "why" and non-obvious decisions.>

## Build & Test
```bash
# Install
<install command>

# Run locally
<run command>

# Test
<test command>

Conventions

<Non-obvious patterns specific to this project. Examples:> - Prefer <X> over <Y> for <reason> - All errors must be <logged/wrapped/re-raised> using <pattern> - File naming: <snake_case / kebab-case / etc.> - <Any other project-specific deviations from defaults>

Key Docs

  • CONTRIBUTING.md — coding standards and PR process
  • docs/architecture.md — system design
  • <add more as relevant>

Agent Notes

<Optional. Anything specific the agent must know:>

  • Always ask before touching <sensitive area>
  • Prefer editing existing files over creating new ones
  • <Team / repo-specific agent guidelines>

---

### Step 4 — Write and Confirm

1. Write the generated content to `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
2. Show the user the file path and a brief summary of what was captured.
3. Ask: *"Does this look right? Anything to adjust — your role, missing conventions, or stack details?"*
4. Apply any corrections and confirm the final file.

---

### Step 5 — Suggest Next Steps

After the file is confirmed, suggest relevant follow-ups:

- **Agent-specific instructions** (`.github/instructions/`) — if the project uses specialized skills or agents
- **Custom agents** (`.github/agents/`) — if certain workflows would benefit from dedicated modes
- **Prompts** (`.github/prompts/`) — for repeatable task templates (e.g. code review, PR description)
- **Skills** (`.github/skills/`) — for on-demand multi-step workflows

---

## Quality Checklist

Before finishing, verify:
- [ ] File is at `.github/copilot-instructions.md` (not nested deeper)
- [ ] Role section accurately reflects the user's perspective
- [ ] Build & test commands were verified (or noted as approximate)
- [ ] Conventions are specific and actionable — not generic advice
- [ ] No section duplicates what a linter or existing doc already enforces
- [ ] File is under 150 lines

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.