agentleFS
iagocavalcanteiagocavalcante/claude-turbo-search/skills/push/SKILL.md

push

Skill16 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Manually upload the persistent memory database to your self-hosted dashboard. Useful after directly running add-fact or add-knowledge — for normal session work, /remember already auto-pushes.

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use get-pr-reviews, push-everything and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • saffron-healthSkill

    get-pr-reviews

    Get nicely formatted output of the last review comments on a PR. Used internally by other skills.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • saffron-healthSkill

    push-everything

    Stage ALL changes in the repository (not just session changes), commit, and push. Use when you need to commit all pending changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    generate-spec

    Produce a feature specification covering API changes, backward compatibility, cross-language impact, performance, and a file-level change plan. Use when designing a new feature, planning a significant change, or the user asks to spec something out.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • anombyte93Skill

    discover

    Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    merge

    Merge changes from the topic branch to the merge base branch. Use when the user wants to merge their session's work back to the base branch.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    spec-review

    Independent, multi-model review of a design or spec **before** any code is written, for the microsoft/winappcli repo. Activate when a contributor asks to "review this spec", "review my design", "review this design doc", "validate this approach", "should we build this", "spec review", "design review", or "feature review". Fans out parallel sub-agents — each doing its OWN research against the real codebase and ecosystem rather than trusting the spec — covering necessity & scope, approach & alternatives, feasibility vs reality, risks & unknowns, DX & user impact, and a different-model-family cross-check. Emits a decision-oriented recommendation (proceed / proceed-with-changes / reconsider) to stdout. This is the PRE-CODE companion to the pr-review skill (which reviews code already written); use spec-review at the design/spec stage, not on an implemented diff. Does NOT write code or edit the spec.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from saffron-health

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the skill's actual installed location, including plugin caches or symlinks.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    When the user invokes /push, run:

    line 19

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Installed paths

Resolve PLUGIN_DIR to the absolute directory two levels above this SKILL.md file. Use the skill's actual installed location, including plugin caches or symlinks; do not infer it from the project's working directory or a home-directory checkout. Set PLUGIN_DIR explicitly in each shell invocation below, keeping the working directory in the user's target repository.

/push - Upload Memory To Dashboard

Send the current repo's .claude-memory/memory.db to your self-hosted Fly.io dashboard. Slug is derived from git remote get-url origin, so it lands on the right per-repo storage automatically.

Instructions

When the user invokes /push, run:

: "${PLUGIN_DIR:?Set PLUGIN_DIR from this skill file location}"
MEMORY_SCRIPT="$PLUGIN_DIR/memory/memory-db.sh"

"$MEMORY_SCRIPT" push

Common outcomes

Happy path:

Pushed .../memory.db to https://<dashboard>/api/repos/<slug>/push

Tell the user the dashboard now reflects this push.

No config — message will be:

no sync remote configured. run `memorydb config set --remote URL --token TOKEN`

Tell the user how to configure it.

No local DB — message will be:

no memory database at <path> — nothing to push

Suggest running /remember first (which creates the DB if needed).

When to use

  • After manually editing memory — running add-fact, add-knowledge, or consolidate directly via memory-db.sh doesn't trigger an auto-push. Use /push to sync.
  • Forcing a sync mid-session — when you want the dashboard fresh without waiting for /remember.
  • Verifying connectivity — quick way to confirm the dashboard is reachable and your token works.

When NOT to use

  • After /remember — that skill auto-pushes already.
  • Routine workflow — let /remember handle pushes at the natural session boundary.

See also

  • /pull — the inverse operation (download from dashboard).
  • /remember — auto-pushes after saving the session.
  • web/README.md — full architecture.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.