spec
Skill527 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft design documents and specs with research-informed questioning
168 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- varelaia/claude-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mrlemoos/galiciatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- standardagents/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Surething-io/cockpittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use backprop, ios-clean and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JuliusBrusseeSkillbackprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-fix
Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
bastosSkillios-design-review
Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".
Also in 5 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 7 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkilldocument-generate
Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Saqlain-811
Other versions168 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 168
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-react-native★ 1.8ksame name
- JuliusBrussee/cavekit★ 1.1ksame name
- kdlbs/kandev★ 1.1ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-dart★ 878same name
- poshan0126/dotclaude★ 871same name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- SparkDevNetwork/Rock★ 701same name
- strands-agents/box★ 503same name
- openclaw/openclaw-enterprise★ 454same name
158 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- blueprint-generateSkill
- blueprintSkill
- domain-settingsSkill
- leaflet-ai-apiSkill
- lexiconsSkill
- mirror-editor-block-stylesSkill
- notificationsSkill
- publication-settingsSkill
- tests-postsSkill
- tests-subscribeSkill
- update-default-themeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 145 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Use this skill when the user explicitly requests a spec, design document, or similar planning artifact.
- Distinctive: line 17
When starting a spec:
- Distinctive: line 18
Ask the user for a brief description of what they want to build/change
- Distinctive: line 25
Research-informed questions: Before asking about an area, do just-in-time codebase research.
- Distinctive: line 27
Adaptive scope: When the designer marks something as out of scope, update your mental model and don't revisit.
- Distinctive: line 32
Ask one focused question at a time, or a small related cluster
- Distinctive: line 34
Avoid hypotheticals that don't apply to this codebase
- Distinctive: line 35
When presenting options, describe tradeoffs without recommending unless asked
- Distinctive: line 39
When the designer indicates readiness, produce the spec document.
- Distinctive: line 67
Add other sections if the problem demands it.
- Distinctive: line 71
No filler, hedging, or preamble
- Distinctive: line 73
Start sections with substance, not meta-commentary
- Distinctive: line 74
Use precise technical language
- Distinctive: line 75
Keep decisions and rationale tight—one sentence each when possible
- Distinctive: line 77
Prefer concrete over abstract.
- Distinctive: line 85
Update status in the document as it progresses.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 145 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Spec Writing
When to Use
Use this skill when the user explicitly requests a spec, design document, or similar planning artifact. Do not auto-trigger for routine tasks.
Process
1. Initial Scoping
When starting a spec:
- Ask the user for a brief description of what they want to build/change
- Reason about which question categories matter for this particular work—derive these from the problem, not a checklist
2. Interrogation Loop
Conduct open-ended questioning until the designer signals completion:
Research-informed questions: Before asking about an area, do just-in-time codebase research. Find relevant files, understand current patterns, identify constraints. Reference specific files and functions in questions when it adds clarity.
Adaptive scope: When the designer marks something as out of scope, update your mental model and don't revisit. However, flag when you believe there are gaps that could cause problems:
- "This approach assumes X—is that intentional?"
- "The current implementation of Y in
src/foo.ts:42handles Z differently. Should we align or diverge?"
Question style:
- Ask one focused question at a time, or a small related cluster
- Ground questions in what you've learned from the codebase
- Avoid hypotheticals that don't apply to this codebase
- When presenting options, describe tradeoffs without recommending unless asked
3. Spec Writing
When the designer indicates readiness, produce the spec document.
Output
Save to: /specs/YYYY-MM-DD-short-name.md
Required Elements
Title and status (draft | approved | implemented)
Goal: What this achieves and why. 1-3 sentences.
Design: The substance of what will be built/changed. For each significant component or concern:
- Describe the approach
- State key decisions with their rationale inline
- Reference specific files, functions, and types where relevant
- Structure subsections to fit the problem—no fixed format
Implementation: Ordered steps that an agent or developer can execute. Each step should:
- Be concrete and actionable
- Reference specific files/functions to modify or create
- Be sequenced correctly (dependencies before dependents)
Optional
- Background context (only if necessary for understanding)
- Open questions (only if unresolved items remain)
Add other sections if the problem demands it.
Writing Style
- No filler, hedging, or preamble
- No "This document describes..." or "In this spec we will..."
- Start sections with substance, not meta-commentary
- Use precise technical language
- Keep decisions and rationale tight—one sentence each when possible
- Code references use
file/path.ts:lineNumberorfunctionNamein backticks - Prefer concrete over abstract; specific over general
Status Lifecycle
- draft: Work in progress. Should not be merged to main.
- approved: Designer has signed off. Ready for implementation.
- implemented: Work is complete. Spec is now historical record.
Update status in the document as it progresses. Specs are point-in-time snapshots—do not update content after implementation begins except to change status.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

