markdown-mermaid-writing
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive markdown and Mermaid diagram writing skill. Use when creating any scientific document, report, analysis, or visualization. Establishes text-based diagrams as the default documentation standard with full style guides (markdown + mermaid), 24 diagram type references, and 9 document templates.
9 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifexedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- patoangolano/bio-stackedited, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- Luooops/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- uppifyagency/boilerplate-saas-2026word for word, first seen Jun 2, 2026
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skilledited, first seen Mar 26, 2026
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skillsedited, first seen Mar 13, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- uppifyagency/boilerplate-saas-2026★ 1100% same
Edited · 7
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills★ 910100% same
- qinyan-ai/qinyan-academic-skills★ 80100% same
- MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex★ 497% same
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skill★ 2100% same
- Luooops/skills★ 199% same
- yf8578/claude-skills-collection★ 197% same
- patoangolano/bio-stack★ 055% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- JunMA98/Computer-science-claude-skills★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- cn-patent-attorney-reviewSkill
- cn-patent-disclosure-draftSkill
- cn-patent-disclosure-reviewSkill
- cn-patent-docx-exportSkill
- cn-patent-domain-runtimeSkill
- cn-patent-formal-draftingSkill
- cn-patent-mainline-analysisSkill
- cn-patent-prior-art-searchSkill
- cn-patent-repo-scoutSkill
- generate-imageSkill
- matplotlibSkill
- scientific-schematicsSkill
- scientific-visualizationSkill
- seabornSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 42
Use this skill when:
- Common: line 51
Do NOT start with Python matplotlib, seaborn, or AI image generation for structural or relational diagrams.
- Common: line 139
Check if a template exists before writing from scratch:
- Very specific: line 155
Before writing any .md file: read references/markdown_style_guide.md.
- Very specific: line 169
Before creating any Mermaid diagram: read references/mermaid_style_guide.md.
- Common: line 187
Start from the template. Apply the markdown style guide.
- Very specific: line 230
Only some diagram types support accTitle/accDescr.
- Very specific: line 256
When scientific-writing produces a manuscript, all diagrams and structural figures should use this skill's standards.
- Common: line 270
Create concept maps (Mindmap) of the literature landscape
- Common: line 277
Before finalizing any document from any skill, apply this skill's checklist:
- Very specific: line 315
All style guides, diagram type guides, and document templates in this skill are ported from the SuperiorByteWorks-LLC/agent-project …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Markdown and Mermaid Writing
Overview
This skill teaches you — and enforces a standard for — creating scientific documentation using markdown with embedded Mermaid diagrams as the default and canonical format.
The core bet: a relationship expressed as a Mermaid diagram inside a .md file is more
valuable than any image. It is text, so it diffs cleanly in git. It requires no build step.
It renders natively on GitHub, GitLab, Notion, VS Code, and any markdown viewer. It uses
fewer tokens than a prose description of the same relationship. And it can always be
converted to a polished image later — but the text version remains the source of truth.
"The more you get your reports and files in .md in just regular text, which mermaid is as well as being a simple 'script language'. This just helps with any downstream rendering and especially AI generated images (using mermaid instead of just long form text to describe relationships < tokens). Additionally mermaid can render along with markdown for easy use almost anywhere by humans or AI."
— Clayton Young (@borealBytes), K-Dense Discord, 2026-02-19
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Creating any scientific document — reports, analyses, manuscripts, methods sections
- Writing any documentation — READMEs, how-tos, decision records, project docs
- Producing any diagram — workflows, data pipelines, architectures, timelines, relationships
- Generating any output that will be version-controlled — if it's going into git, it should be markdown
- Working with any other skill — this skill defines the documentation layer that wraps every other output
- Someone asks you to "add a diagram" or "visualize the relationship" — Mermaid first, always
Do NOT start with Python matplotlib, seaborn, or AI image generation for structural or relational diagrams. Those are Phase 2 and Phase 3 — only used when Mermaid cannot express what's needed (e.g., scatter plots with real data, photorealistic images).
🎨 The Source Format Philosophy
Why text-based diagrams win
| What matters | Mermaid in Markdown | Python / AI Image |
| Git diff readable | ✅ | ❌ binary blob |
| Editable without regenerating | ✅ | ❌ |
| Token efficient vs. prose | ✅ smaller | ❌ larger |
| Renders without a build step | ✅ | ❌ needs hosting |
| Parseable by AI without vision | ✅ | ❌ |
| Works in GitHub / GitLab / Notion | ✅ | ⚠️ if hosted |
| Accessible (screen readers) | ✅ accTitle/accDescr | ⚠️ needs alt text |
| Convertible to image later | ✅ anytime | — already image |
The three-phase workflow
flowchart LR
accTitle: Three-Phase Documentation Workflow
accDescr: Phase 1 Mermaid in markdown is always required and is the source of truth. Phases 2 and 3 are optional downstream conversions for polished output.
p1["📄 Phase 1<br/>Mermaid in Markdown<br/>(ALWAYS — source of truth)"]
p2["🐍 Phase 2<br/>Python Generated<br/>(optional — data charts)"]
p3["🎨 Phase 3<br/>AI Generated Visuals<br/>(optional — polish)"]
out["📊 Final Deliverable"]
p1 --> out
p1 -.->|"when needed"| p2
p1 -.->|"when needed"| p3
p2 --> out
p3 --> out
classDef required fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,stroke-width:2px,color:#1e3a5f
classDef optional fill:#fef9c3,stroke:#ca8a04,stroke-width:2px,color:#713f12
classDef output fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,stroke-width:2px,color:#14532d
class p1 required
class p2,p3 optional
class out outputPhase 1 is mandatory. Even if you proceed to Phase 2 or 3, the Mermaid source stays committed.
What Mermaid can express
Mermaid covers 24 diagram types. Almost every scientific relationship fits one:
| Use case | Diagram type | File |
| Experimental workflow / decision logic | Flowchart | references/diagrams/flowchart.md |
| Service interactions / API calls / messaging | Sequence | references/diagrams/sequence.md |
| Data model / schema | ER diagram | references/diagrams/er.md |
| State machine / lifecycle | State | references/diagrams/state.md |
| Project timeline / roadmap | Gantt | references/diagrams/gantt.md |
| Proportions / composition | Pie | references/diagrams/pie.md |
| System architecture (zoom levels) | C4 | references/diagrams/c4.md |
| Concept hierarchy / brainstorm | Mindmap | references/diagrams/mindmap.md |
| Chronological events / history | Timeline | references/diagrams/timeline.md |
| Class hierarchy / type relationships | Class | references/diagrams/class.md |
| User journey / satisfaction map | User Journey | references/diagrams/user_journey.md |
| Two-axis comparison / prioritization | Quadrant | references/diagrams/quadrant.md |
| Requirements traceability | Requirement | references/diagrams/requirement.md |
| Flow magnitude / resource distribution | Sankey | references/diagrams/sankey.md |
| Numeric trends / bar + line charts | XY Chart | references/diagrams/xy_chart.md |
| Component layout / spatial arrangement | Block | references/diagrams/block.md |
| Work item status / task columns | Kanban | references/diagrams/kanban.md |
| Cloud infrastructure / service topology | Architecture | references/diagrams/architecture.md |
| Multi-dimensional comparison / skills radar | Radar | references/diagrams/radar.md |
| Hierarchical proportions / budget | Treemap | references/diagrams/treemap.md |
| Binary protocol / data format | Packet | references/diagrams/packet.md |
| Git branching / merge strategy | Git Graph | references/diagrams/git_graph.md |
| Code-style sequence (programming syntax) | ZenUML | references/diagrams/zenuml.md |
| Multi-diagram composition patterns | Complex Examples | references/diagrams/complex_examples.md |
💡 Pick the right type, not the easy one. Don't default to flowcharts for everything. A timeline beats a flowchart for chronological events. A sequence beats a flowchart for service interactions. Scan the table and match.
🔧 Core workflow
Step 1: Identify the document type
Check if a template exists before writing from scratch:
| Document type | Template |
| Pull request record | templates/pull_request.md |
| Issue / bug / feature request | templates/issue.md |
| Sprint / project board | templates/kanban.md |
| Architecture decision (ADR) | templates/decision_record.md |
| Presentation / briefing | templates/presentation.md |
| Research paper / analysis | templates/research_paper.md |
| Project documentation | templates/project_documentation.md |
| How-to / tutorial | templates/how_to_guide.md |
| Status report | templates/status_report.md |
Step 2: Read the style guide
Before writing any .md file: read references/markdown_style_guide.md.
Key rules to internalize:
- One H1 per document — the title. Never more.
- Emoji on H2 headings only — one emoji per H2, none in H3/H4
- Cite everything — every external claim gets a footnote
[^N]with full URL - Bold sparingly — max 2-3 bold terms per paragraph, never full sentences
- Horizontal rule after every
</details>— mandatory - Tables over prose for comparisons, configurations, structured data
- Diagrams over walls of text — if it describes flow, structure, or relationships, add Mermaid
Step 3: Pick the diagram type and read its guide
Before creating any Mermaid diagram: read references/mermaid_style_guide.md.
Then open the specific type file (e.g., references/diagrams/flowchart.md) for the exemplar, tips, and copy-paste template.
Mandatory rules for every diagram:
accTitle: Short Name 3-8 Words
accDescr: One or two sentences explaining what this diagram shows.- No
%%{init}directives — breaks GitHub dark mode - No inline
style— useclassDefonly - One emoji per node max — at the start of the label
snake_casenode IDs — match the label
Step 4: Write the document
Start from the template. Apply the markdown style guide. Place diagrams inline with related text — not in a separate "Figures" section.
Step 5: Commit as text
The .md file with embedded Mermaid is what gets committed. If you also generated a PNG or AI image, those are supplementary — the markdown is the source.
⚠️ Common pitfalls
Radar chart syntax (radar-beta)
WRONG:
radar
title Example
x-axis ["A", "B", "C"]
"Series" : [1, 2, 3]CORRECT:
radar-beta
title Example
axis a["A"], b["B"], c["C"]
curve series["Series"]{1, 2, 3}
max 3- Use
radar-betanotradar(the bare keyword doesn't exist) - Use
axisto define dimensions, notx-axis - Use
curveto define data series, not quoted labels with colon - No
accTitle/accDescr— radar-beta doesn't support accessibility annotations; always add a descriptive italic paragraph above the diagram
XY Chart vs Radar confusion
| Diagram | Keyword | Axis syntax | Data syntax |
| XY Chart (bars/lines) | xychart-beta | x-axis ["Label1", "Label2"] | bar [10, 20] or line [10, 20] |
| Radar (spider/web) | radar-beta | axis id["Label"] | curve id["Label"]{10, 20} |
Forgetting accTitle/accDescr on supported types
Only some diagram types support accTitle/accDescr. For those that don't, always place a descriptive italic paragraph directly above the code block:
Radar chart comparing three methods across five performance dimensions. Note: Radar charts do not support accTitle/accDescr.
radar-beta
...🔗 Integration with other skills
With scientific-schematics
scientific-schematics generates AI-powered publication-quality images (PNG). Use the Mermaid diagram as the brief for the schematic:
Workflow:
1. Create the concept as Mermaid in .md (this skill — Phase 1)
2. Describe the same concept to scientific-schematics for a polished PNG (Phase 3)
3. Commit both — the .md as source, the PNG as a supplementary figureWith scientific-writing
When scientific-writing produces a manuscript, all diagrams and structural figures should use this skill's standards. The writing skill handles prose and citations; this skill handles visual structure.
Workflow:
1. Use scientific-writing to draft the manuscript
2. For every figure that shows a workflow, architecture, or relationship:
- Replace placeholder with a Mermaid diagram following this skill's guide
3. Use scientific-schematics only for figures that truly need photorealistic/complex renderingWith literature-review
Literature review produces summaries with lots of relationship data. Use this skill to:
- Create concept maps (Mindmap) of the literature landscape
- Show publication timelines (Timeline or Gantt)
- Compare methodologies (Quadrant or Radar)
- Diagram data flows described in papers (Sequence or Flowchart)
With any skill that produces output documents
Before finalizing any document from any skill, apply this skill's checklist:
- Does the document use a template? If so, did I start from the right one?
- Are all diagrams in Mermaid with
accTitle+accDescr? - No
%%{init}, no inlinestyle, onlyclassDef? - Are all external claims cited with
[^N]? - One H1, emoji on H2 only?
- Horizontal rules after every
</details>?
📚 Reference index
Style guides
| Guide | Path | Lines | What it covers |
| Markdown Style Guide | references/markdown_style_guide.md | ~733 | Headings, formatting, citations, tables, Mermaid integration, templates, quality checklist |
| Mermaid Style Guide | references/mermaid_style_guide.md | ~458 | Accessibility, emoji set, color classes, theme neutrality, type selection, complexity tiers |
Diagram type guides (24 types)
Each file contains: production-quality exemplar, tips specific to that type, and a copy-paste template.
references/diagrams/ — architecture, block, c4, class, complex_examples, er, flowchart, gantt, git_graph, kanban, mindmap, packet, pie, quadrant, radar, requirement, sankey, sequence, state, timeline, treemap, user_journey, xy_chart, zenuml
Document templates (9 types)
templates/ — decision_record, how_to_guide, issue, kanban, presentation, project_documentation, pull_request, research_paper, status_report
Examples
assets/examples/example-research-report.md — a complete scientific research report demonstrating proper heading hierarchy, multiple diagram types (flowchart, sequence, gantt), tables, footnote citations, collapsible sections, and all style guide rules applied.
📝 Attribution
All style guides, diagram type guides, and document templates in this skill are ported from the SuperiorByteWorks-LLC/agent-project repository under the Apache-2.0 License.
- Source: https://github.com/SuperiorByteWorks-LLC/agent-project
- Author: Clayton Young / Superior Byte Works, LLC (@borealBytes)
- License: Apache-2.0
This skill (as part of scientific-agent-skills) is distributed under the MIT License. The included Apache-2.0 content is compatible for downstream use with attribution retained, as preserved in the file headers throughout this skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

