cognitive-accessibility
Skill5 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Improve content and workflows for users with varied attention, memory, and executive function profiles. Use when user asks to 'simplify content', 'reduce cognitive load', 'improve readability', 'chunk content', 'make accessible for ADHD', 'help with focus'.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- stritar/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- Community-Access/accessibility-agentstheir own version, first seen May 6, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- Community-Access/accessibility-agents★ 409same name
- stritar/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- accessibilitySkill
- age-inclusive-designSkill
- conflict-de-escalationSkill
- cultural-sensitivitySkill
- depression-sensitive-contentSkill
- empathetic-communicationSkill
- neurodiversity-aware-designSkill
- supportive-conversationSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
Use clear, simple language
- Distinctive: line 49
Never use jargon without explanation
- Distinctive: line 50
Never create complex multi-step flows without breaks
- Distinctive: line 60
Safety boundaries apply: Do not make medical or clinical claims about cognitive conditions such as ADHD or dyslexia.
- Distinctive: line 78
No way to save progress
- Distinctive: line 138
Use White Space: Don't crowd content
- Distinctive: line 141
Allow Pacing: Don't rush users
- Distinctive: line 147
Avoid: Sentences over 25 words
- Distinctive: line 153
Use white space between paragraphs
- Distinctive: line 156
Use common, everyday words
- Distinctive: line 159
Use verbs, not noun forms
- Distinctive: line 167
Don't require memory across steps
- Distinctive: line 172
Don't blame users
- Distinctive: line 178
Don't require remembering
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cognitive Accessibility
Purpose
Improves content and workflows for users with varied attention, memory, and executive function profiles. Applies cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1988), chunking strategies, and clear information architecture.
When to Use
- "Simplify this content"
- "Reduce cognitive load"
- "Make this more readable"
- "Chunk this information"
- "Help users with focus issues"
- "Improve accessibility for ADHD"
- "Simplify the user flow"
Boundaries
Always
- Use clear, simple language
- Chunk information into small pieces
- Provide clear signposting
- Include recovery options
Ask First
- Confirm before major restructuring
- Check cultural context
Never
- Never use jargon without explanation
- Never create complex multi-step flows without breaks
Principles
This skill is grounded in the Humanity4AI core principles and the following skill-specific principles:
- Cognitive load is a spectrum. Users have varying levels of working memory, attention, and executive function. Recommendations must be framed as considerations, not absolute requirements.
- Simplicity is not condescension. Clear, simple language and structured layouts respect all users. Avoid framing simplification as "dumbing down".
- Explicit uncertainty over false certainty. Acknowledge when a recommendation may not apply to all users or contexts.
- Inclusive design benefits everyone. Cognitive accessibility improvements (chunked content, clear headings, reduced distractions) improve usability for all users.
- Safety boundaries apply. Do not make medical or clinical claims about cognitive conditions such as ADHD or dyslexia.
Instructions
Step 1: Assess Load
Analyze content for:
- Sentence length and complexity
- Jargon and technical terms
- Multi-step processes
- Information density
Step 2: Identify Friction
Find:
- Ambiguous instructions
- Missing progress indicators
- No way to save progress
- Dense paragraphs
Step 3: Recommend Changes
Suggest:
- Chunking strategies
- Clear headings
- Progress indicators
- Save/resume options
Examples
Example 1: Chunking
Input: "To register, fill out the form completely including your name, email, phone number, address, and preferences, then review your information, confirm it's correct, and submit."
Output: "Register in 3 steps:
- Your details (name, email)
- Your address
- Review and submit"
Example 2: Clear Language
Input: "The aforementioned functionality requires authentication prior to utilization."
Output: "You need to sign in to use this feature."
Additional Resources
- references/standards.md - Cognitive accessibility standards
- references/patterns.md - Chunking patterns
- references/checklist.md - Cognitive checklist
- references/load-theory.md - Cognitive load theory
- references/simplification.md - Simplification techniques
- references/measurement.md - Measurement metrics
- references/examples.md - Examples
- references/quick-reference.md - Quick reference
Cognitive Load Theory
Note: Cognitive Load Theory was originally developed for instructional design; its application to user interface and content design is an extrapolation supported by subsequent HCI research (Hollender et al., 2010; Paas et al., 2003).
Types of Cognitive Load
Intrinsic Load: Inherent complexity of the material
- Cannot be eliminated, can be managed
- Break complex topics into steps
Extraneous Load: Unnecessary burden from design
- Should be minimized
- Clear layout, simple language
Germane Load: Productive learning
- Should be supported
- Good examples, practice
Reducing Cognitive Load
- Chunk Information: Group related items
- Use White Space: Don't crowd content
- Clear Hierarchy: Headings, lists, structure
- Multiple Formats: Text + images + video
- Allow Pacing: Don't rush users
Sentence and Paragraph Guidelines
Sentence Length
- Target: 15-20 words maximum
- Avoid: Sentences over 25 words
- Split long sentences into two
Paragraph Length
- Maximum 3-4 sentences per paragraph
- One idea per paragraph
- Use white space between paragraphs
Word Choice
- Use common, everyday words
- Avoid jargon
- Define technical terms inline
- Use verbs, not noun forms
Task Design
Multi-Step Tasks
- Break into 3-5 steps maximum
- Show progress (step X of Y)
- Allow saving progress
- Don't require memory across steps
Error Recovery
- Clear error messages
- Suggest corrections
- Don't blame users
- Easy to find and fix errors
Navigation
- Consistent placement
- Clear labels
- Don't require remembering
- Provide search
Script Usage
This skill includes validation scripts:
- analyze_load.py — Analyze cognitive load
- measure_readability.py — Measure readability
- simplify_text.py — Suggest simplifications
- chunk_content.py — Analyze chunking
# Analyze cognitive load
# Measure readabilityThis skill helps create cognitively accessible content.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

