tiny-model-creator
Skill625 starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create a small random Hugging Face model that preserves the original architecture and can serve as a local Optimum Intel repository test fixture.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Create a tiny random model for the requested architecture without loading the original model weights.
- Distinctive: line 15
If repairing a tiny model after a validation or benchmark failure, start from the exact failing local artifact, creation script, traceback, …
- Very specific: line 44
Create create_tiny_model.py in the designated working directory.
- Very specific: line 62
Do not reuse a cache merely because config.json and a weight file exist.
- Distinctive: line 63
Before returning it, validate a cache-format/version marker and all critical configuration invariants, including architecture identity, …
- Very specific: line 68
Keep construction logic easy to adapt into _create_tiny_<model_type>_model() in tests/openvino/utils_tests.py.
- Very specific: line 81
When deliberately forcing a test model to float32, update and verify every effective precision field used by the remote configuration …
- Distinctive: line 86
Never rename the model type, substitute a nearby architecture, or remove a component merely to make export pass.
- Very specific: line 89
If the tiny model's model_type, architectures, or task-relevant component identity differs from the original model, stop and report the …
- Very specific: line 99
Follow the task-specific tiny-model validation and output-validity instructions supplied for <task>.
- Distinctive: line 102
If task execution fails, repair the violated configuration invariant, recreate the model, and rerun it.
- Distinctive: line 113
Do not upload the tiny model to Hugging Face.
- Distinctive: line 114
Do not edit installed packages or the virtual environment.
- Distinctive: line 115
Do not modify system files or system-wide package installations.
- Distinctive: line 116
Use a deterministic seed where supported.
- Distinctive: line 117
Avoid original weight downloads and large generated artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 118
Never commit machine-specific absolute paths.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tiny Model Creator
Create a tiny random model for the requested architecture without loading the original model weights. The artifact must preserve the real architecture and execute the requested task path.
If repairing a tiny model after a validation or benchmark failure, start from the exact failing local artifact, creation script, traceback, and task reproducer. Repair that artifact and rerun the same command; do not generate a different model and use its success as evidence for the failed one.
Step 1 — Inspect the original model
Download or load configuration and lightweight code/processor assets only. Record:
model_type,architectures,auto_map, and Transformers metadata;- nested text, vision, audio, and projector configurations;
- hidden-size, head-count, grouping, rotary, cache, vocabulary, and special token invariants;
- tokenizer, processor, chat-template, and remote-code files required to load;
- the correct model or pipeline class and execution interface for the task.
Determine and record the Transformers version or version range supported by the original model, especially for trust-remote-code architectures. Create and validate the tiny model using a compatible version; do not silently substitute another model implementation because the active Transformers version lacks the architecture.
Inspect precision fields under every relevant configuration level. Remote
models may use dtype, torch_dtype, or both, including separate values in
vision, text, audio, or projector sub-configs.
Step 2 — Write a reusable constructor
Create create_tiny_model.py in the designated working directory. It must:
- Load the original configuration without loading original weights.
- Reduce layers, hidden dimensions, intermediate sizes, vocabulary, image resolution or patch counts, experts, and similar scale parameters.
- Preserve divisibility and coupling invariants such as head dimensions, grouped-query attention, projector sizes, vision/text bridges, cache dimensions, and special-token IDs.
- Instantiate random weights through the real architecture class.
- Save every required config, tokenizer, processor, chat template, generation config, and remote-code asset.
- Reuse a completed cached output directory on repeated calls.
Define maximum parameter-count and model-memory budgets, then verify both after construction so reducing layer count cannot be offset by widening other dimensions. Estimate weight memory from each parameter's element count and element size, and reject a candidate that exceeds either budget.
Do not reuse a cache merely because config.json and a weight file exist.
Before returning it, validate a cache-format/version marker and all critical
configuration invariants, including architecture identity, dimensions,
special tokens, processor assets, and nested precision fields. Rebuild the
cache when the generator logic or required invariants change.
Keep construction logic easy to adapt into
_create_tiny_<model_type>_model() in tests/openvino/utils_tests.py.
Step 3 — Verify architecture identity
Compare the original and tiny configurations. Preserve:
model_typeandarchitectures;- task-relevant sub-config types and component roles;
- cache/stateful and position-ID contracts;
- VLM processor classes, placeholder/image tokens, and merge contracts;
- MoE/expert topology, even when expert counts are reduced.
When deliberately forcing a test model to float32, update and verify every
effective precision field used by the remote configuration (dtype and/or
torch_dtype, including nested sub-configs). Reload the saved model and check
its actual parameter dtypes; editing an ignored config key is not sufficient.
Never rename the model type, substitute a nearby architecture, or remove a component merely to make export pass.
If the tiny model's model_type, architectures, or task-relevant component
identity differs from the original model, stop and report the mismatch. A tiny
model that executes successfully through another architecture is not a valid
fixture.
Step 4 — Validate the real task path
Reload the saved directory through its documented Transformers or pipeline API and execute the requested task.
Follow the task-specific tiny-model validation and output-validity instructions
supplied for <task>.
If task execution fails, repair the violated configuration invariant, recreate the model, and rerun it. Loading, saving, or a forward pass alone is not success.
The final validation evidence must load the exact output directory returned by the creator, execute the requested task, and include the command and output. Do not validate one directory and return a different cached or previously generated artifact.
Rules
- Do not upload the tiny model to Hugging Face.
- Do not edit installed packages or the virtual environment.
- Do not modify system files or system-wide package installations.
- Use a deterministic seed where supported.
- Avoid original weight downloads and large generated artifacts.
- Never commit machine-specific absolute paths.
- Cache repository-test fixtures so test collection does not rebuild them unnecessarily.
Report
Report the output directory, script path, configuration comparison, parameter count, exact task execution command, output, and any dependency or remote-code constraints.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

