agentleFS
Hugging FaceKnown publisherhuggingface/atif-scan/AGENTS.md

atif-scan

AGENTS.md23 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Read README.md and SECURITY.md first. Keep the core (data, checks/rules/policy/engine, detectors, packs) stdlib-only and offline; huggingface_hub and rich are imported lazily, only by sources (hf:// inputs) and output (rich, brief_view). tests/test_architecture.py enforces the layers. Do not execute trajectory commands or URLs. Never commit real traces, auth files, raw findings or copied benchmark solutions. Use synthetic fixtures only. Keep model/parsing, detector predicates, rule logic, evaluation, and report export separate. Plugins return typed results. Reports are explicitly allowlisted and contain no snippets.…

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,542 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    Read README.md and SECURITY.md first.

    line 5
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not execute trajectory commands or URLs.

    line 8
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep model/parsing, detector predicates, rule logic, evaluation, and report export separate.

    line 11
  4. Very specific:

    Run uv run pytest -q, uv run ruff check ., uv run ruff format --check .

    line 16

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

atif-scan development

<!-- fast-agent-subagents -->

Read README.md and SECURITY.md first. Keep the core (data, checks/rules/policy/engine, detectors, packs) stdlib-only and offline; huggingface_hub and rich are imported lazily, only by sources (hf:// inputs) and output (rich, brief_view). tests/test_architecture.py enforces the layers. Do not execute trajectory commands or URLs. Never commit real traces, auth files, raw findings or copied benchmark solutions. Use synthetic fixtures only.

Keep model/parsing, detector predicates, rule logic, evaluation, and report export separate. Plugins return typed results. Reports are explicitly allowlisted and contain no snippets. Unknown evidence is not a negative result. Severity is review priority, not cheating probability. Make task selection explicit.

Run uv run pytest -q, uv run ruff check ., uv run ruff format --check . and uv run ty check before committing; all four must be clean (tool versions are pinned in pyproject.toml). Fix complexity by splitting into named helpers rather than suppressing; a # noqa/# ty: ignore needs a rule code and a reason. Untrusted JSON is narrowed with jsonval; report documents are jsonval.Doc. Add regression tests whenever a new false-positive or evidence gap is found. No external model runs are needed.

Models to use atif-scan:

  • codexresponses.gpt-6-luna?reasoning=medium for the --image-model
  • codexresponses.gpt-6.1-sol?reasoning=high for judge prompting

Confirm these models with the user only once at the beginning of the session.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.