feature-implementation
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Workflow skill for implementing features, behavior changes, and bug fixes using a test-driven development approach. Use when: implementing a new feature, changing existing behavior, or fixing a bug that requires code changes. Guides repository inspection, requirements analysis, planning, TDD, implementation, refactoring, and validation.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ericwang200608-beep/LANYANT-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dss-time/repo-doctor-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AIEraDev/Clypratheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- jpicklyk/task-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- tstapler/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 10, 2026
- nafeeur/MaskShifttheir own version, first seen Sep 12, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- AIEraDev/Clypra★ 3.4ksame name
- jpicklyk/task-orchestrator★ 214same name
- zeeshanhanif/agentic-sdlc-kit★ 17same name
- tstapler/dotfiles★ 8same name
- aiagelab/aia-feature-workbench★ 2same name
- ericwang200608-beep/LANYANT-Skills★ 2same name
- nafeeur/MaskShift★ 2same name
- dss-time/repo-doctor-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- doc-maintenanceSkill
- git-commit-push-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this skill for feature work, behavior changes, and bug fixes that require code changes.
- Distinctive: line 14
Follow repository-specific instructions and conventions.
- Distinctive: line 15
Prefer existing abstractions and dependencies, minimal changes, preserved public behavior, and no speculative refactoring.
- Distinctive: line 16
Test observable behavior and meaningful success, failure, boundary, and regression cases rather than chasing coverage metrics.
- Distinctive: line 28
Before implementation, create a concise plan covering behavior, tests, implementation, validation, and risks.
- Distinctive: line 34
Red: write the smallest useful failing test and confirm it fails for the expected reason.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not skip Red unless TDD is impractical.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not alter unrelated code to hide unrelated failures.
- Distinctive: line 53
If requirements conflict, identify the conflict, prioritize explicit requirements, and add compatibility or migration handling as needed.
- Distinctive: line 54
Do not claim completion while known validation failures remain unexplained.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature Implementation Skill
Use this skill for feature work, behavior changes, and bug fixes that require code changes. It covers implementation only; use dedicated workflows for review, documentation maintenance, release, deployment, or pull requests.
Principles
- Inspect relevant implementation, tests, configuration, documentation, and repository guidance before editing.
- Follow repository-specific instructions and conventions; do not invent a competing pattern.
- Prefer existing abstractions and dependencies, minimal changes, preserved public behavior, and no speculative refactoring.
- Test observable behavior and meaningful success, failure, boundary, and regression cases rather than chasing coverage metrics.
Workflow
1. Analyze the Request
Identify the requested behavior, expected outcome, inputs and outputs, constraints, affected existing behavior, and possible breaking changes. Establish concrete acceptance criteria before implementation. Ask only focused questions that repository inspection cannot answer.
2. Inspect the Repository
Inspect only relevant areas. Check existing implementation and tests, build and package configuration, APIs and CLI definitions, schemas, CI, documentation, repository instructions, and reusable abstractions. Determine where the change belongs, what tests and conventions apply, which validation commands are relevant, and whether compatibility or migration concerns exist. Do not edit during inspection.
Before implementation, create a concise plan covering behavior, tests, implementation, validation, and risks. Resolve ambiguities that could materially change behavior before making irreversible changes.
3. Follow TDD
For each meaningful behavior, repeat:
- Red: write the smallest useful failing test and confirm it fails for the expected reason.
- Green: implement the minimum change needed to pass, then run the new and relevant existing tests.
- Refactor: improve naming, control flow, duplication, responsibilities, errors, and readability without changing behavior; rerun tests.
Do not skip Red unless TDD is impractical; explain the deviation and use the closest test-first approach. Prefer several small cycles for independent behaviors. See TDD and quality details when the detailed checklist is needed.
4. Preserve Quality and Boundaries
Preserve behavior that is not being changed, public APIs, and expected backward compatibility. For relevant trust boundaries, validate input, preserve security controls, avoid sensitive-data exposure and unsafe parsing or execution, and follow existing mechanisms. Consider realistic error and edge cases without adding speculative complexity.
5. Validate and Complete
Run targeted tests first, then relevant regression tests and repository checks such as type checking, linting, builds, packaging, or documentation validation. Inspect git diff and git status; confirm only intended files changed, tests and documentation are included where needed, and no debug or temporary artifacts remain. See Validation and completion for the detailed checklist and reporting format.
Failure and Ambiguity Rules
- Fix failures caused by the implementation.
- Correct a test only when requirements or established repository behavior show its assumption is wrong.
- Do not alter unrelated code to hide unrelated failures; report them separately.
- If requirements conflict, identify the conflict, prioritize explicit requirements, and add compatibility or migration handling as needed.
- Do not claim completion while known validation failures remain unexplained.
Completion Criteria
Complete only when acceptance criteria are met, appropriate tests are added or updated, TDD was followed or its deviation documented, relevant validation passes, existing behavior is preserved unless intentionally changed, the final diff is scoped, required documentation is updated, and no known in-scope issue remains.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

