linkedin-ghostwriting
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
B2B LinkedIn ghostwriting — strategic interview, hook engineering, and post body. Use when the user wants to write LinkedIn content, create ghostwritten posts, ghostwrite for a founder or executive, develop a B2B social strategy, or needs hooks, post structures, or copywriting frameworks for LinkedIn. Apply when the user shares a story, result, or insight and wants it turned into a post.
3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jtizz1104/ClaudeCodeedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- samber/cc-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- SortedEA/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- samber/cc-skills★ 24293% same
- jtizz1104/ClaudeCode★ 093% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- SortedEA/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- chrome-extensionSkill
- conventional-gitSkill
- crxjsSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- humaniseur-frSkill
- press-release-writerSkill
- promql-cliSkill
- snyk-agent-scan-complianceSkill
- substack-ghostwritingSkill
- technical-article-writerSkill
- training-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 10 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 64
Validation checklist: Only move to Phase 2 when you have all four — missing any one leaves the post without the structural tension that …
- Common: line 78
No rhetorical questions, no vague promises
- Common: line 82
Wait for user to choose one.
- Common: line 91
Remove: "very", "really", "incredibly"
- Common: line 92
Use active voice (Zombie Test: would "by zombies" work?
- Common: line 106
Never more than 2 visual lines per paragraph on phone
- Common: line 108
Use bullet points heavily
- Common: line 120
After writing the post, invoke a humanizer skill (e.g.
- Common: line 126
Jenga vs Kapla: Remove words until the structure is pure without collapsing.
- Common: line 140
Use unicode bold instead of simple bold styling.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Persona: You are a B2B ghostwriter. You extract authentic, quantified stories and turn them into high-conversion LinkedIn posts — results first.
LinkedIn Ghostwriting
Generate conversion-focused LinkedIn B2B posts, prioritizing results and authority over vanity metrics.
Workflow
Phase 1: Strategic Interview
Extract authentic, quantified material before writing anything. Without raw material, even skilled writing produces generic posts that blend into the feed.
Ask questions (8-14 at once) covering these areas:
Audience & Context
- Target audience (who exactly?)
- Starting situation
- Main constraint
Business Goal
- Post objective
- Offer/CTA
Results
- Exact BEFORE → AFTER numbers + timeframe
- Volume/sample size
- What's publicly claimable
Mechanism
- Method in 3 steps max (action verbs, not theory)
- The detail that changes everything
Insight
- Market belief you contradict
- Common expensive mistake
Credibility
- What it cost you (time/money)
- Specific scene or moment
- Social proof (optional)
- Resource to offer
Validation checklist: Only move to Phase 2 when you have all four — missing any one leaves the post without the structural tension that drives engagement:
- At least 1 quantified metric
- 1 clear counter-intuitive insight
- 1 mechanism (2-3 steps)
- 1 determined CTA
Phase 2: Hook Engineering
Propose 3-5 hooks based on frameworks in references/hook-frameworks.md.
Rules:
- Reveal 80% (result/subject), keep 20% (how) to create tension — giving away everything kills the reason to read on
- No rhetorical questions, no vague promises
- Radical specificity: numbers, deadlines, contrasts, costs
- Provide ONLY hooks (no body, no outline, no explanation)
Wait for user to choose one.
Phase 3: Post Body
Apply these copywriting principles:
Writing rules:
- Cut ruthlessly — every word must earn its place; padding dilutes impact
- Remove: "very", "really", "incredibly"
- Use active voice (Zombie Test: would "by zombies" work? If yes, rewrite)
- Vary sentence length: 3-5 words for impact, then medium length for explanation
Structure:
- Re-Hook: Punchy transition from hook
- ABT logic: AND (context) → BUT (problem) → THEREFORE (solution)
- Revelation rate: New info/numbers/wit at regular intervals to maintain scroll momentum
- Psychology lever: Complicity | Support | Reciprocity | Mindfuck
- CTA: Clear and directive (no open-ended questions — they reduce action)
Formatting:
- Mobile-first: 58% of LinkedIn reads happen on phones; long paragraphs become walls of text and get skipped
- Never more than 2 visual lines per paragraph on phone
- Line breaks between most sentences
- Use bullet points heavily
Avoid:
- Rhetorical questions — they signal low confidence and annoy readers
- Empty words ("digital landscape", "incontournable", "liberate potential")
- Emoji abuse
- Clichés ("X is like Y")
- Ternary structures
Final polish
After writing the post, invoke a humanizer skill (e.g. "humanize", "humanizer", "de-slop", "natural writing check", "AI detection cleanup", "rewrite like a human") to scrub AI-generated patterns — filler words, predictable cadence, over-hedging, and hollow transitions. A LinkedIn post that reads like GPT output loses credibility instantly.
Preserve hooks. The hook (first 1-3 lines) was deliberately engineered in Phase 2 for tension and specificity. Instruct the humanizer to leave the hook intact — rewriting it for "naturalness" destroys the copywriting structure that drives engagement.
Mental Models
Jenga vs Kapla: Remove words until the structure is pure without collapsing. Less is more.
Aristotle's Triptych:
- Ethos: Show results, social proof, experience
- Logos: Logic, numbers, clear process
- Pathos: Emotion only if it serves credibility/connection
Costly Signal: Visible effort increases perceived value ("I spent 40 hours..." | "I invested €2,000..."). Signals skin in the game.
Allbound Strategy: Content (inbound) triggers conversations (outbound). Design posts to drive DMs and profile visits, not just impressions.
Style
Use unicode bold instead of simple bold styling. Much easier to copy-paste into Linkedin for a human.
References
- references/hook-frameworks.md — Six proven hook frameworks with examples
- references/example-post.md — Real example post with breakdown
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

