agentleFS
hollandkevinthollandkevint/data-product-operator/skills/dashboards-to-decisions/SKILL.md

dashboards-to-decisions

Skill5 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Convert dashboard requests into decision specifications. The missing layer between "build me a dashboard" and "help me decide." Use when receiving dashboard requests, reviewing analytics backlogs, prioritizing data team work, or when someone asks "what dashboard do you need?" Apply this BEFORE building anything.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When someone asks "I need a dashboard," the first question is: "What decision will this inform?"

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If they can't answer, the dashboard shouldn't exist yet.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask: "What decision will this dashboard help you make?

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    If the requester struggles, use these prompts:

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    If no decision emerges: the request is a monitoring need, not a decision need.

    line 29
  6. Distinctive:

    Write a decision specification that captures:

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    Only after Steps 1-3 are clear, design the visualization.

    line 56
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask your team: "Name 3 decisions that changed because of something we shipped last quarter."

    line 75
  9. Distinctive:

    If they can't, you're stuck at Layer 1.

    line 77

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

The Reframe

When someone asks "I need a dashboard," the first question is: "What decision will this inform?"

If they can't answer, the dashboard shouldn't exist yet. Not "never build it." Just "not yet." Get the decision clear first.

The Process

Step 1: Surface the Decision

Ask: "What decision will this dashboard help you make? Be specific — not 'understand performance' but 'decide whether to expand into the Southeast region this quarter.'"

If the requester struggles, use these prompts:

  • "What would you DO differently after seeing this dashboard?"
  • "If the number is high, what changes? If it's low, what changes?"
  • "Who makes this decision, and when?"

If no decision emerges: the request is a monitoring need, not a decision need. Route to Layer 1 (dashboard craft) and move on.

Step 2: Map the Decision Architecture

ElementQuestionExample
DecisionWhat specifically is being decided?"Expand to Southeast: yes/no"
Decision-makerWho has authority?"VP of Operations, with CFO sign-off"
TimelineWhen does this decision get made?"Q3 planning, due July 15"
Metrics neededWhat data informs this?"Market size, current penetration, operational capacity, P&L impact"
ThresholdWhat number triggers action?"If projected ROI > 15% AND capacity utilization < 80%"
ContextWhat else does the decision-maker need to know?"Previous expansion to Midwest failed at 12% ROI"
Failure modeWhat would make the wrong decision?"Misleading market size data (happened with Midwest)"

Step 3: Design the Decision Spec (Not the Dashboard)

Write a decision specification that captures:

  1. The question (in plain language, not metric language)
  2. The answer format (yes/no, rank order, threshold comparison)
  3. The data required (specific metrics with definitions and sources)
  4. The context required (what the decision-maker needs to know before looking at data)
  5. The intent (when metrics conflict, which wins?)
  6. The failure mode (what would lead to a wrong decision?)

Step 4: THEN Design the Dashboard

Only after Steps 1-3 are clear, design the visualization. Now you know:

  • What metrics to show (from the data requirement)
  • How to organize them (around the decision, not the data model)
  • What context to include (the "how to use this" layer)
  • What thresholds to highlight (the intent layer)

The Four Layers Applied

LayerWhat This Skill Adds
Layer 1: Dashboard CraftThe dashboard itself (this is where most teams stop)
Layer 2: Decision ContextThe "what you need to know before looking at the data" document
Layer 3: Decision IntentThe thresholds and metric priorities that encode business judgment
Layer 4: Decision InfrastructureThe full spec that lets the decision-maker self-serve

Cross-reference stakeholder-alignment for translating between data teams and business stakeholders.

The Monday Morning Test

Ask your team: "Name 3 decisions that changed because of something we shipped last quarter."

If they can't, you're stuck at Layer 1. This skill moves you to Layer 2+.

Output

# Decision Specification: [Decision Name]
Date: [date]
Requester: [who asked for this]

## The Decision
[Plain language question]

## Decision-Maker & Timeline
[Who decides, by when]

## Metrics Required
| Metric | Definition | Source | Current Value |
|--------|-----------|--------|---------------|
| [metric] | [precise definition] | [data source] | [if known] |

## Decision Threshold
[What number triggers which action]

## Context
[What the decision-maker needs to know before looking at data]

## Intent (When Metrics Conflict)
[Which metric wins and why]

## Failure Modes
[What would lead to a wrong decision]

## Dashboard Recommendation
[Now we can spec the visualization — layout, key charts, highlights]

From the Decision Engineering framework. Generic decision tools: decision-architecture.


Part of the Data Product Operator plugin.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.