openspec-archive-change
Skill128 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 7 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
7
Common
Most of the 121 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Run openspec list --json to get available changes.
- Distinctive: line 25
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change.
- Very specific: line 29
Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json to check artifact completion.
- Distinctive: line 37
Use AskUserQuestion tool to confirm user wants to proceed
- Very specific: line 42
Read the tasks file (typically tasks.md) to check for incomplete tasks.
- Very specific: line 55
Check for delta specs at openspec/changes/<name>/specs/.
- Common: line 63
If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
- Common: line 64
If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
- Distinctive: line 66
If user chooses sync, use Task tool (subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Use Skill tool to invoke openspec-sync-specs for change …
- Distinctive: line 70
Create the archive directory if it doesn't exist:
- Common: line 78
If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
- Common: line 79
If no: Move the change directory to archive
- Common: line 108
Always prompt for change selection if not provided
- Very specific: line 109
Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
- Common: line 110
Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
- Distinctive: line 113
If sync is requested, use openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven)
- Common: line 114
If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 121 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select.Show only active changes (not already archived). Include the schema used for each change if available.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
Check artifact completion status
Run
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonto check artifact completion.Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being usedartifacts: List of artifacts with their status (doneor other)
If any artifacts are not
done:- Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
Check task completion status
Read the tasks file (typically
tasks.md) to check for incomplete tasks.Count tasks marked with
- [ ](incomplete) vs- [x](complete).If incomplete tasks found:
- Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
If no tasks file exists: Proceed without task-related warning.
Assess delta spec sync state
Check for delta specs at
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/. If none exist, proceed without sync prompt.If delta specs exist:
- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
- Show a combined summary before prompting
Prompt options:
- If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
- If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
If user chooses sync, use Task tool (subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Use Skill tool to invoke openspec-sync-specs for change '
<name>'. Delta spec analysis:<include the analyzed delta spec summary>"). Proceed to archive regardless of choice.- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at
Perform the archive
Create the archive directory if it doesn't exist:
mkdir -p openspec/changes/archiveGenerate target name using current date:
YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>Check if target already exists:
- If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
- If no: Move the change directory to archive
mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>Display summary
Show archive completion summary including:
- Change name
- Schema that was used
- Archive location
- Whether specs were synced (if applicable)
- Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
Output On Success
## Archive Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs (or "No delta specs" or "Sync skipped")
All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.Guardrails
- Always prompt for change selection if not provided
- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
- Show clear summary of what happened
- If sync is requested, use openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven)
- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
Other versions166 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 41
- akkadotnet/akka.net★ 5.1k100% same
- moka-rs/moka★ 2.7k100% same
- dotnetfactory/fluid-calendar★ 996100% same
- Azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3★ 798100% same
- yaoyao2mm/cheatreader★ 655100% same
- atilladeniz/Kubeli★ 387100% same
- jingsewu/open-wes★ 342100% same
- lis186/ccxray★ 295100% same
- zhe-qi/clhoria-template★ 193100% same
- webspatial/webspatial-sdk★ 153100% same
31 more not listed
Edited · 123
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 73k11% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k74% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k96% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.2k20% same
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.1k20% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.1k82% same
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.1k99% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.3k96% same
- KunAgent/Kun★ 6.3k99% same
- XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.3k99% same
113 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 2
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openspec-ff-change, source-command-opsx-apply and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-ff-change
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Also in 62 projects that use this
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)
Also in 5 projects that use this
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow
Also in 5 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 70 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 59 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Also in 77 projects that use this
- +2 more from antech2-async
- +1 more from microsoft
In this repository62 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- internal/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- pkg/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- internal/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- pkg/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/agent-files.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apps/bun.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apps/eth-contracts.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apps/xrp-server.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/database/atlas-hcl.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/database/sqlc.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/documentation-language.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/general.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/github-actions.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/go/conventions.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/go/di.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/go/go-path.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/go/go-test.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/application-layer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/btc-shared.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/clean-architecture.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/cli-structure.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/domain-layer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/dto.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/infrastructure-layer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/interface-adapters-layer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/internal-interface.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/mockery.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/repository.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/internal/usecase.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/proto.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/README.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/shell-script.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/ssot.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/task-context-loading.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/yaml.mdcCursor rule
- llms.txtllms.txt
- bch-developmentSkill
- btc-terminologySkill
- db-migrationSkill
- devopsSkill
- docs-ssotSkill
- docs-updateSkill
- fix-pr-reviewSkill
- github-issue-creationSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- go-developmentSkill
- knowledge-gapSkill
- label-context-mappingSkill
- makefile-updateSkill
- mockerySkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- shell-scriptsSkill
- solidity-developmentSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

