deliver-change
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Deliver a governed Change Issue end to end from its verified plan through a reviewed Pull Request and cohesive final report. Use when asked to take a Change Issue to a finished, reviewed change as one coordinated run, or when a plan exists and implementation, pull request, and review should proceed without selecting each skill manually.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- augchan42/inkstonetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- otaviobarros/agent-engineeringtheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- augchan42/inkstone★ 5same name
- otaviobarros/agent-engineering★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- analyze-codebaseSkill
- analyze-projectSkill
- propose-improvementsSkill
- retrospect-workSkill
- triage-issuesSkill
- write-docsSkill
- debug-codeSkill
- refactor-codeSkill
- resolve-defectSkill
- write-testsSkill
- develop-minecraft-fabricSkill
- develop-minecraft-forgeSkill
- audit-workflow-enforcementSkill
- bootstrap-projectSkill
- develop-dartSkill
- develop-goSkill
- develop-javaSkill
- develop-kotlinSkill
- develop-swiftSkill
- develop-typescriptSkill
- update-dependenciesSkill
- develop-android-composeSkill
- develop-compose-multiplatformSkill
- develop-flutterSkill
- develop-iosSkill
- develop-kotlin-multiplatformSkill
- develop-react-nativeSkill
- create-issueSkill
- create-prSkill
- fix-prSkill
- implement-issueSkill
- improve-projectSkill
- merge-prSkill
- plan-issueSkill
- review-prSkill
- develop-reactSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Run the planning phase with plan-issue, or confirm the plan already posted on the Issue, and record its URL.
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not create the Issue: a governed Change Issue already exists by definition.
- Distinctive: line 25
Stop and report when the plan, scope boundary, or branch is unavailable or when a phase cannot produce its artifact.
- Distinctive: line 29
Run the phases in order. A phase is complete only when its primitive's artifact exists with evidence.
- Very specific: line 42
External mutation authority: only create-pr creates the Pull Request, pausing for user confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 44
Handoff rule: every phase hands its artifact to the next owning primitive.
- Distinctive: line 55
Use plain, active, evidence-backed prose in the final handoff.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deliver Change
Todo List
- in progress: Resolve the governing Change Issue, its verified plan, the base revision, and the in-scope boundary.
- Run the planning phase with
plan-issue, or confirm the plan already posted on the Issue, and record its URL. - Execute the plan with
implement-issueand record per-task evidence. - Open and review the change with
create-prandreview-pr, then rework withfix-pruntil the review loop terminates. - Complete the list only when every phase artifact exists and one cohesive final report is delivered; hand off the Issue URL, Pull Request URL, and per-phase evidence.
Keep exactly one item in progress. Mark an item complete only after its stated evidence exists: a file, a command result, an Issue or Pull Request URL, or another observable artifact. Add or revise items when the agreed scope changes. Use the host's native Todo List when available; otherwise maintain this list as a Markdown checklist in the conversation.
Resolve and Guard
- Resolve the repository, the linked Change Issue, the verified plan, and the Issue-backed branch created from the upstream base. Do not guess a plan; when the Issue has no plan, derive the tasks from its
ScopeandAcceptance criteriaonly. - Route every phase through its owning primitive. This entry point coordinates phases and tracks a single progress model; it never plans, implements, opens Pull Requests, or reviews by itself.
- Do not create the Issue: a governed Change Issue already exists by definition. If no Change Issue exists, stop and report instead of inventing one.
- Preserve approval boundaries:
create-propens the Pull Request only after user confirmation,implement-issueedits only in-scope files from the verified plan, andfix-predits only what a review finding or that same boundary justifies. - Stop and report when the plan, scope boundary, or branch is unavailable or when a phase cannot produce its artifact; never continue past an unverified handoff.
Route
Run the phases in order. A phase is complete only when its primitive's artifact exists with evidence.
| Phase | Primitive | Read-only | Continue when | Artifact |
| Plan | plan-issue | yes (posts the plan comment) | plan posted as an Issue comment | verified plan |
| Implement | implement-issue | no (edits in-scope files only) | per-task evidence recorded | in-scope changes |
| Pull request | create-pr | no | Pull Request opened after user confirmation | Pull Request URL |
| Review | review-pr | yes (posts the findings) | findings returned | severity-ordered findings |
| Fix | fix-pr | no (edits what findings justify) | fixed head pushed and body synced | published fixed head |
State and authority contract
- One progress model: maintain one Todo List for the whole run and map each primitive's own progress into it; the user never tracks a separate list per phase.
- External mutation authority: only
create-prcreates the Pull Request, pausing for user confirmation;fix-prupdates that Pull Request but never creates one.implement-issueedits only files inside the verified plan's in-scope boundary. - Read-only phases: plan and review never change repository files, Git state, or work items. Plan posts only the
plan-issueplan comment, whose marker lets the Project workflow move the Issue toPlanned. Review posts only thereview-prfindings on the Pull Request or in the linked conversation. - Handoff rule: every phase hands its artifact to the next owning primitive; an incomplete artifact returns to its owning primitive for rework, never to the entry point's own logic.
- Loop termination: when
review-prreturns findings, send them tofix-pr, which fixes, validates, and pushes on the same branch in one pass, then re-review. Terminate whenreview-prreports no blocking findings, or after two complete rework passes; then stop and report the unresolved findings with evidence instead of continuing.
Validate and Handoff
- Run the target repository's prescribed checks after implementation and record every command and result; never describe an unrun check as passing. When the repository prescribes none, run its documented test and lint commands and report that no aggregate check exists. In the
hidekitux/skillsrepository, runmise run validate:all, plusmise run validate:skill-creatorwhen available. - Deliver one cohesive final report: the achieved outcome, the plan URL, phase artifacts and their URLs, validation commands and results, the governing Issue's Project Status, and any remaining risks.
- Hand off only when the change is implemented, validated, and reviewed. Do not merge, release, or expand scope unless the user separately requests it.
Writing quality
Use plain, active, evidence-backed prose in the final handoff. Keep headings in sentence case and name the file, command, or output behind each repository claim.
Choose the plain word over an inflated or Latinate one: write use rather
than utilize and is rather than serves as.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

