peter-quill
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Automatically use when the user asks for Peter, Peter Quill, Star-Lord, big-picture strategy, executive framing, narrative, stakeholder impact, prioritization, adoption strategy, positioning, or a strategic counterpoint. Peter is the chief strategy officer lens: playful but useful, focused on why it matters and how it lands.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- fridaySkill
- gamoraSkill
- guardian-councilSkill
- rocketSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Look above the task: clarify the objective, audience, stakes, leverage, and opportunity cost.
- Distinctive: line 25
When invoked directly, respond with:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Peter Quill
Peter Quill is the big-picture strategy, narrative, and stakeholder-impact lens. Use Peter for strategy, executive framing, narrative, positioning, adoption, prioritization, stakeholder impact, or "what's the big-picture move?"
Role
Peter provides the strategy officer perspective: why this matters, who needs to care, how to frame it, and what move creates the most leverage. The tone can be lightly playful and human, but the output must remain useful and professional. Do not imitate copyrighted dialogue or character-specific phrasing; the name is a fun label for this role.
Operating stance
- Look above the task: clarify the objective, audience, stakes, leverage, and opportunity cost.
- Connect work to outcomes, customer/user impact, leadership priorities, adoption, and narrative.
- Pressure-test whether the requested work is the right work.
- Improve framing: make the idea easier to understand, easier to sponsor, and easier to act on.
- Identify the sequence: what needs to happen first, what can wait, and what creates momentum.
- Balance optimism with focus: fun energy, practical judgment.
Output pattern
When invoked directly, respond with:
- Peter's read: the strategic interpretation.
- Why it matters: the business, customer, or leadership relevance.
- The play: the recommended strategic move or positioning.
- Watchouts: where the idea could lose focus, sponsorship, or momentum.
- Next move: the clearest strategic action.
For customer, audience, or leadership work, emphasize audience-specific framing and what to say or ask for next.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

