agentleFS
helderbertohelderberto/agent-skills/skills/safe-repo/SKILL.md

safe-repo

Skill19 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub

Scan the repository for committed secrets and sensitive data; `--diff [<base>]` scopes to a branch's changes. Use when asked to "check for sensitive data", "scan for secrets", or verify no credentials or company data are committed. Don't use for code-level security (/harden), dependency CVEs (/deps-audit), or non-git directories.

  • Reads credentials

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run this skill's scripts/scan-secrets.sh with bash to scan all tracked files for credential patterns

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Check for sensitive tracked files by name: .env* (except .env.example), *.pem, *.key, *_rsa*, *secret*, *credential*

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Check current tracked files AND git history

    line 38
  4. Very specific:

    Verify .gitignore covers sensitive patterns

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Never output actual secret values in report

    line 42
  6. Distinctive:

    If git history scan is slow → limit to last 100 commits with git log --oneline -100

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Safe Repository Check

Context

Security audit for sensitive data in repository. Check for credentials, API keys, company-specific information, and PII.

Modes

  • Default (full-scan): scans all git-tracked files plus history. Use for periodic audits or first-time repo review.
  • --diff [<base>]: scans only what changed: the branch's commits since <base>, plus staged + unstaged changes. No <base> → staged + unstaged only. Use before a commit, from review, or from to-pr --safe. Fast, no false positives from pre-existing files.

Workflow

Default (full-scan)

  1. Run this skill's scripts/scan-secrets.sh with bash to scan all tracked files for credential patterns
  2. Check for sensitive tracked files by name: .env* (except .env.example), *.pem, *.key, *_rsa*, *secret*, *credential*
  3. Analyze git history for removed secrets: git log --all --full-history -- "*.env" "*.pem" "*.key" "*secret*" "*credential*"
  4. Review .gitignore for proper patterns
  5. Report findings (see assets/report-template.md)

--diff mode

  1. Compute changed files: git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD when a base is given, plus git diff --name-only HEAD + git diff --name-only --cached
  2. Scan only those files with the regexes in this skill's scripts/scan-secrets.sh (grep them directly) plus the filename checks above
  3. Skip history analysis (not relevant for in-flight changes)
  4. Report findings scoped to changed files only

Rules

  • Only check git-tracked files (git ls-files) - ignore local configs
  • Check current tracked files AND git history
  • Filter false positives: minified JS, node_modules, test fixtures, docs
  • Verify .gitignore covers sensitive patterns
  • Report tracked files with secrets and historical commits
  • Never output actual secret values in report

Error Handling

  • If git history scan is slow → limit to last 100 commits with git log --oneline -100

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.