prepare-release
Skill8 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Release preparation for Stages I-L of the VibeFlow docs-first workflow
- Commits and pushes
47 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- leancodepl/patroltheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- CherryHQ/cherry-studiotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Azure/azure-sdk-for-rusttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Krzysztof318/MailFathomtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- epam/ketchertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- netbox-community/netboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use publish-release, sync-docs and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Model Context ProtocolSkillpublish-release
Publish a GitHub release for the C# MCP SDK after a prepare-release PR has been merged. Refreshes release notes to include any PRs merged since preparation, warns about version or breaking change impacts from late-arriving PRs, and creates a draft GitHub release. Use when asked to publish a release, finalize a release, create release notes, or complete a release after the prepare-release PR has been merged.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Eipi-TongSkillsync-docs
Update SPEC.md and docs/DECISIONS.md to reflect recent code changes. Use after completing a feature, or when the user says "sync docs", "update the spec", or "log this decision".
Also in 4 projects that use this
thlaureSkillreview-change
Use this skill when the user asks for a code review, a correctness pass, a check before PR, or asks whether a Signalist change follows project conventions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DockerSkillfix-issue
Fix a single GitHub issue end-to-end: triage, research, write the fix, review, and create a PR. Use when asked to fix an issue: "fix issue 1234", "resolve #500", "create a PR for issue 200".
Also in 4 projects that use this
kiminmonacoSkillimplement-feature
Guide for implementing features in ClaudeBar following architecture-first design, TDD, rich domain models, and Swift 6.2 patterns. Use this skill when: (1) Adding new functionality to the app (2) Creating domain models that follow user's mental model (3) Building SwiftUI views that consume domain models directly (4) User asks "how do I implement X" or "add feature Y" (5) Implementing any feature that spans Domain, Infrastructure, and App layers
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillwrite-docs
Create or update documentation pages for the Abacus docs site. Use when adding new documentation, updating existing pages, or ensuring docs stay in sync with code changes. Ensures pages follow Starlight patterns and build correctly.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions47 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 47
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio★ 53ksame name
- redis/go-redis★ 22ksame name
- netbox-community/netbox★ 22ksame name
- joke2k/faker★ 19ksame name
- pybind/pybind11★ 18ksame name
- telepresenceio/telepresence★ 7.3ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdk★ 4.6ksame name
- tmoroney/auto-subs★ 4.5ksame name
- CLIUtils/CLI11★ 4.5ksame name
- ethereum/consensus-specs★ 4ksame name
37 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-codebaseSkill
- clarify-demandSkill
- create-feature-specSkill
- define-prdSkill
- define-tech-specSkill
- manage-workSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- run-tddSkill
- validate-checkpointSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 46 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 95
Purpose: Ensure documentation matches implementation before release.
- Distinctive: line 99
Update any divergent signatures or behaviors
- Distinctive: line 101
Update ADRs if decisions changed during implementation
- Distinctive: line 102
Document any deviations discovered
- Distinctive: line 106
Purpose: Document everything operators need for deployment.
- Very specific: line 141
Update docs/features/index.md - mark feature complete
- Very specific: line 142
Update docs/op-notes/index.md - link OP-NOTE
- Very specific: line 143
Update docs/specs/index.md if new SPECs created
- Distinctive: line 144
Create git tag for release
- Distinctive: line 145
Run retrospective (Large track only)
- Distinctive: line 157
Test rollback procedures: Don't assume they work
- Distinctive: line 158
Update indices promptly: Don't let documentation lag
- Distinctive: line 159
Reconcile specs honestly: Document what was actually built
- Very specific: line 173
After completing each stage, update docs/workflow-state.yaml:
- Distinctive: line 198
After completing each stage, ask the user for permission before committing:
- Very specific: line 224
After each sub-stage commit, directly run /manage-work advance <ID>:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 46 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
prepare-release
Release preparation for Stages I-L of the VibeFlow docs-first workflow.
Purpose
This skill guides release preparation through Stages I-L:
- Stage I: Spec Reconciliation (sync docs with implementation)
- Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation (deployment documentation)
- Stage K: Deploy (execute deployment)
- Stage L: Close Loop (update indices, retrospective)
Workflow
Stage I: Spec Reconciliation
│
├── Compare Feature Spec vs actual implementation
├── Update SPEC documents with any deviations
├── Reconcile ADRs with decisions made
└── Ensure docs match deployed reality
│
▼
Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation
│
├── Create docs/op-notes/op-<feature>.md
├── Document: Preflight, Deploy Steps, Monitoring
├── Document: Runbook, Rollback, Post-Deploy Checks
└── Update op-notes/index.md
│
▼
Stage K: Deploy
│
├── Execute preflight checklist
├── Run deployment steps
├── Execute post-deploy verification
└── Monitor for issues
│
▼
Stage L: Close Loop
│
├── Update master indices
├── Mark feature complete
├── Run retrospective (Large track)
└── Archive or link documentationUsage
Check Release Readiness
/prepare-release checkValidates OP-NOTE completeness and spec reconciliation status.
Create OP-NOTE
/prepare-release opnote <feature-slug>Creates docs/op-notes/op-<feature-slug>.md from template with all required sections.
Reconcile Specs
/prepare-release reconcile <feature-id>Compares Feature Spec vs actual implementation and updates divergent docs.
Stage Details
Stage I: Spec Reconciliation
Purpose: Ensure documentation matches implementation before release.
Tasks:
- Compare Feature Spec API Design with actual implementation
- Update any divergent signatures or behaviors
- Review SPEC documents for accuracy
- Update ADRs if decisions changed during implementation
- Document any deviations discovered
Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation
Purpose: Document everything operators need for deployment.
Required Sections:
- Header (file, date, features covered)
- Preflight (prerequisites, migrations, env vars)
- Deploy Steps (ordered commands with verification)
- Monitoring (dashboards, alerts, SLOs)
- Runbook (symptom → diagnose → remediate)
- Rollback (precise steps, data compatibility)
- Post-Deploy Checks (smoke tests, owners)
Location: docs/op-notes/op-<feature-slug>.md
Stage K: Deploy
Purpose: Execute deployment following OP-NOTE.
Pre-Deploy Checklist:
- OP-NOTE complete and validated
- All preflight items checked
- Rollback plan verified
- On-call notified
- Monitoring dashboards open
Post-Deploy Checklist:
- Health checks passing
- Smoke tests executed
- Error rates nominal
- Performance within SLOs
Stage L: Close Loop
Purpose: Finalize feature lifecycle.
Tasks:
- Update
docs/features/index.md- mark feature complete - Update
docs/op-notes/index.md- link OP-NOTE - Update
docs/specs/index.mdif new SPECs created - Create git tag for release
- Run retrospective (Large track only)
Indices to Update:
- Feature index with completion status
- OP-NOTE index with deployment link
- SPEC index with version updates
- ADR index with new decisions
Best Practices
- Never deploy without OP-NOTE: Gate production deployments
- Keep runbooks actionable: Symptom → Diagnose → Remediate
- Test rollback procedures: Don't assume they work
- Update indices promptly: Don't let documentation lag
- Reconcile specs honestly: Document what was actually built
Validation
scripts/validate_opnote.py— Validate OP-NOTE completenessscripts/reconcile_specs.py— Check spec reconciliation status
References
See assets/:
opnote-template.md— OP-NOTE template
Manifest Update
After completing each stage, update docs/workflow-state.yaml:
Stage I (Reconcile):
- Set
stage: I
Stage J (OP-NOTE):
- Set
stage: J - Set
docs.opnote: docs/op-notes/op-<slug>.md
Checkpoint #5 (after Stage J):
- Set
checkpoint: 5after passing validation - Criteria: OP-NOTE exists with all required sections, spec reconciliation complete
Stage K (Deploy):
- Set
stage: K
Stage L (Close):
- Set
stage: L
Checkpoint #6 (after Stage L):
- Set
checkpoint: 6after passing validation - Criteria: Deployment verified, indices updated, git tag created
Git Commit
After completing each stage, ask the user for permission before committing:
Stage I (Reconcile):
git add docs/ docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): reconcile specs with implementation (#ft-<ID>)"Stage J (OP-NOTE):
git add docs/op-notes/op-<slug>.md docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): create OP-NOTE for <slug> (#ft-<ID>)"Stage L (Close):
git add docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): close <slug> (#ft-<ID>)"
git tag v<version>-<slug>
gh pr create --title "[ft-<ID>] <Description>" --body "Closes #ft-<ID>"Replace <slug>, <ID>, <version>, and <Description> with actual values.
Auto-Advance
After each sub-stage commit, directly run /manage-work advance <ID>:
- After Stage I (Reconcile) commit → advances I→J.
- After Stage J (OP-NOTE) commit → advances J→K. The advance command will automatically validate Checkpoint #5 at the J→K boundary.
- After Stage K (Deploy) commit → advances K→L.
- After Stage L (Close) commit → advances L→DONE. The advance command will automatically validate Checkpoint #6 at the L→DONE boundary.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

