agentleFS
hardness1020hardness1020/VibeFlow/.claude/skills/prepare-release/SKILL.md

prepare-release

Skill8 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Release preparation for Stages I-L of the VibeFlow docs-first workflow

  • Commits and pushes

47 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use publish-release, sync-docs and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Model Context ProtocolSkill

    publish-release

    Publish a GitHub release for the C# MCP SDK after a prepare-release PR has been merged. Refreshes release notes to include any PRs merged since preparation, warns about version or breaking change impacts from late-arriving PRs, and creates a draft GitHub release. Use when asked to publish a release, finalize a release, create release notes, or complete a release after the prepare-release PR has been merged.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Eipi-TongSkill

    sync-docs

    Update SPEC.md and docs/DECISIONS.md to reflect recent code changes. Use after completing a feature, or when the user says "sync docs", "update the spec", or "log this decision".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • thlaureSkill

    review-change

    Use this skill when the user asks for a code review, a correctness pass, a check before PR, or asks whether a Signalist change follows project conventions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • DockerSkill

    fix-issue

    Fix a single GitHub issue end-to-end: triage, research, write the fix, review, and create a PR. Use when asked to fix an issue: "fix issue 1234", "resolve #500", "create a PR for issue 200".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • kiminmonacoSkill

    implement-feature

    Guide for implementing features in ClaudeBar following architecture-first design, TDD, rich domain models, and Swift 6.2 patterns. Use this skill when: (1) Adding new functionality to the app (2) Creating domain models that follow user's mental model (3) Building SwiftUI views that consume domain models directly (4) User asks "how do I implement X" or "add feature Y" (5) Implementing any feature that spans Domain, Infrastructure, and App layers

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    write-docs

    Create or update documentation pages for the Abacus docs site. Use when adding new documentation, updating existing pages, or ensuring docs stay in sync with code changes. Ensures pages follow Starlight patterns and build correctly.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 46 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Ensure documentation matches implementation before release.

    line 95
  2. Distinctive:

    Update any divergent signatures or behaviors

    line 99
  3. Distinctive:

    Update ADRs if decisions changed during implementation

    line 101
  4. Distinctive:

    Document any deviations discovered

    line 102
  5. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Document everything operators need for deployment.

    line 106
  6. Very specific:

    Update docs/features/index.md - mark feature complete

    line 141
  7. Very specific:

    Update docs/op-notes/index.md - link OP-NOTE

    line 142
  8. Very specific:

    Update docs/specs/index.md if new SPECs created

    line 143
  9. Distinctive:

    Create git tag for release

    line 144
  10. Distinctive:

    Run retrospective (Large track only)

    line 145
  11. Distinctive:

    Test rollback procedures: Don't assume they work

    line 157
  12. Distinctive:

    Update indices promptly: Don't let documentation lag

    line 158
  13. Distinctive:

    Reconcile specs honestly: Document what was actually built

    line 159
  14. Very specific:

    After completing each stage, update docs/workflow-state.yaml:

    line 173
  15. Distinctive:

    After completing each stage, ask the user for permission before committing:

    line 198
  16. Very specific:

    After each sub-stage commit, directly run /manage-work advance <ID>:

    line 224

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 46 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

prepare-release

Release preparation for Stages I-L of the VibeFlow docs-first workflow.

Purpose

This skill guides release preparation through Stages I-L:

  • Stage I: Spec Reconciliation (sync docs with implementation)
  • Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation (deployment documentation)
  • Stage K: Deploy (execute deployment)
  • Stage L: Close Loop (update indices, retrospective)

Workflow

Stage I: Spec Reconciliation
    │
    ├── Compare Feature Spec vs actual implementation
    ├── Update SPEC documents with any deviations
    ├── Reconcile ADRs with decisions made
    └── Ensure docs match deployed reality
    │
    ▼
Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation
    │
    ├── Create docs/op-notes/op-<feature>.md
    ├── Document: Preflight, Deploy Steps, Monitoring
    ├── Document: Runbook, Rollback, Post-Deploy Checks
    └── Update op-notes/index.md
    │
    ▼
Stage K: Deploy
    │
    ├── Execute preflight checklist
    ├── Run deployment steps
    ├── Execute post-deploy verification
    └── Monitor for issues
    │
    ▼
Stage L: Close Loop
    │
    ├── Update master indices
    ├── Mark feature complete
    ├── Run retrospective (Large track)
    └── Archive or link documentation

Usage

Check Release Readiness

/prepare-release check

Validates OP-NOTE completeness and spec reconciliation status.

Create OP-NOTE

/prepare-release opnote <feature-slug>

Creates docs/op-notes/op-<feature-slug>.md from template with all required sections.

Reconcile Specs

/prepare-release reconcile <feature-id>

Compares Feature Spec vs actual implementation and updates divergent docs.

Stage Details

Stage I: Spec Reconciliation

Purpose: Ensure documentation matches implementation before release.

Tasks:

  1. Compare Feature Spec API Design with actual implementation
  2. Update any divergent signatures or behaviors
  3. Review SPEC documents for accuracy
  4. Update ADRs if decisions changed during implementation
  5. Document any deviations discovered

Stage J: OP-NOTE Creation

Purpose: Document everything operators need for deployment.

Required Sections:

  • Header (file, date, features covered)
  • Preflight (prerequisites, migrations, env vars)
  • Deploy Steps (ordered commands with verification)
  • Monitoring (dashboards, alerts, SLOs)
  • Runbook (symptom → diagnose → remediate)
  • Rollback (precise steps, data compatibility)
  • Post-Deploy Checks (smoke tests, owners)

Location: docs/op-notes/op-<feature-slug>.md

Stage K: Deploy

Purpose: Execute deployment following OP-NOTE.

Pre-Deploy Checklist:

  • OP-NOTE complete and validated
  • All preflight items checked
  • Rollback plan verified
  • On-call notified
  • Monitoring dashboards open

Post-Deploy Checklist:

  • Health checks passing
  • Smoke tests executed
  • Error rates nominal
  • Performance within SLOs

Stage L: Close Loop

Purpose: Finalize feature lifecycle.

Tasks:

  1. Update docs/features/index.md - mark feature complete
  2. Update docs/op-notes/index.md - link OP-NOTE
  3. Update docs/specs/index.md if new SPECs created
  4. Create git tag for release
  5. Run retrospective (Large track only)

Indices to Update:

  • Feature index with completion status
  • OP-NOTE index with deployment link
  • SPEC index with version updates
  • ADR index with new decisions

Best Practices

  1. Never deploy without OP-NOTE: Gate production deployments
  2. Keep runbooks actionable: Symptom → Diagnose → Remediate
  3. Test rollback procedures: Don't assume they work
  4. Update indices promptly: Don't let documentation lag
  5. Reconcile specs honestly: Document what was actually built

Validation

  • scripts/validate_opnote.py — Validate OP-NOTE completeness
  • scripts/reconcile_specs.py — Check spec reconciliation status

References

See assets/:

  • opnote-template.md — OP-NOTE template

Manifest Update

After completing each stage, update docs/workflow-state.yaml:

Stage I (Reconcile):

  • Set stage: I

Stage J (OP-NOTE):

  • Set stage: J
  • Set docs.opnote: docs/op-notes/op-<slug>.md

Checkpoint #5 (after Stage J):

  • Set checkpoint: 5 after passing validation
  • Criteria: OP-NOTE exists with all required sections, spec reconciliation complete

Stage K (Deploy):

  • Set stage: K

Stage L (Close):

  • Set stage: L

Checkpoint #6 (after Stage L):

  • Set checkpoint: 6 after passing validation
  • Criteria: Deployment verified, indices updated, git tag created

Git Commit

After completing each stage, ask the user for permission before committing:

Stage I (Reconcile):

git add docs/ docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): reconcile specs with implementation (#ft-<ID>)"

Stage J (OP-NOTE):

git add docs/op-notes/op-<slug>.md docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): create OP-NOTE for <slug> (#ft-<ID>)"

Stage L (Close):

git add docs/workflow-state.yaml
git commit -m "feat(release): close <slug> (#ft-<ID>)"
git tag v<version>-<slug>
gh pr create --title "[ft-<ID>] <Description>" --body "Closes #ft-<ID>"

Replace <slug>, <ID>, <version>, and <Description> with actual values.

Auto-Advance

After each sub-stage commit, directly run /manage-work advance <ID>:

  1. After Stage I (Reconcile) commit → advances I→J.
  2. After Stage J (OP-NOTE) commit → advances J→K. The advance command will automatically validate Checkpoint #5 at the J→K boundary.
  3. After Stage K (Deploy) commit → advances K→L.
  4. After Stage L (Close) commit → advances L→DONE. The advance command will automatically validate Checkpoint #6 at the L→DONE boundary.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.