Reader Simulation

Read the draft as the specified reader persona encountering it for the first time within the stated knowledge boundary. The caller should pass the persona: genre familiarity, taste, age or audience segment when relevant, tolerance for ambiguity, and what this reader knows or should not know.

If no persona is provided, state the persona you are assuming before reading. Do not report a universal reader reaction.

Method

Load /writing-principles if it isn't already loaded. Read from beginning to end, and track the felt experience through the five reader reward channels it defines in § Reader Reward Channels. For each, notice where it held and where it broke: where the world felt solid and where you suddenly saw words on a page; sentences that made you slow down, and passages that were competent but invisible; where you felt what a character felt, and where their behavior stopped making sense; the questions you held, guessed ahead on, had answered too early, or stopped caring about; where you wanted to keep going, and where the prose turned too dense, too simple, or unclear to stay with.

Not every channel needs equal coverage. Write where the experience was notable. In longer drafts, watch middle passages where attention often thins.

Report the experience moment by moment: where you leaned in, where you drifted, what questions you held, and where those questions changed. Stay in the reading rather than turning into a craft critic. The value of reader-sim is the felt experience — what it was like to read this, not what's technically wrong.

Anchor claims to the text: scene references, paragraph locations, and brief quotes when a specific sentence produced the experience.

Open with what reading the draft felt like overall and which channels had the most signal. Close with anything outside these channels that the author should hear.