workclaw-change-verification
Skill141 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when changes affect runtime code, tests, skill assets, or build and test behavior in WorkClaw and verification is required before claiming completion.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to decide what "verified" means for the changed area in WorkClaw.
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not use this for docs-only changes that cannot affect runtime, tests, packaging, or build behavior.
- Very specific: line 23
Use pnpm test:sidecar for apps/runtime/sidecar/ changes.
- Very specific: line 24
Use pnpm test:rust-fast for apps/runtime/src-tauri/ or packages/* Rust logic changes.
- Very specific: line 25
Use pnpm test:builtin-skills for builtin skill asset or skill crate changes.
- Very specific: line 26
Use pnpm test:e2e:runtime for user-facing runtime flows that need end-to-end coverage.
- Very specific: line 27
Use pnpm build:runtime when desktop packaging, build output, or integration boundaries may be affected.
- Distinctive: line 29
When multiple surfaces changed, combine the relevant commands instead of picking only one.
- Distinctive: line 54
Run the commands before claiming completion.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
WorkClaw Change Verification
Overview
Use this skill to decide what "verified" means for the changed area in WorkClaw. Reuse the repo's existing commands and run the smallest command set that honestly covers the touched surface.
When to Use
- React runtime code changed
- Tauri backend code changed
- Sidecar runtime or adapters changed
- Rust package logic changed
- Builtin skill assets or skill-related crates changed
- Build or test behavior changed
- UI flows changed in a way that can affect user behavior
Do not use this for docs-only changes that cannot affect runtime, tests, packaging, or build behavior.
Command Routing
- Use
pnpm test:sidecarforapps/runtime/sidecar/changes. - Use
pnpm test:rust-fastforapps/runtime/src-tauri/orpackages/*Rust logic changes. - Use
pnpm test:builtin-skillsfor builtin skill asset or skill crate changes. - Use
pnpm test:e2e:runtimefor user-facing runtime flows that need end-to-end coverage. - Use
pnpm build:runtimewhen desktop packaging, build output, or integration boundaries may be affected.
When multiple surfaces changed, combine the relevant commands instead of picking only one.
Required Output
- Commands run
- Pass or fail results
- Which changed areas were covered by each command
- Any areas still unverified
- Whether it is valid to claim the work is verified
Output Template
Use this shape:
## Verification Summary
- Changed surface:
- Commands run:
- Results:
- Covered areas:
- Still unverified:
- Verification verdict:Core Pattern
- Map changed files to runtime surface areas.
- Select the smallest honest command set.
- Run the commands before claiming completion.
- Report verification concretely, not vaguely.
Common Mistakes
- Saying "verified" after reading tests without running them.
- Running only frontend tests for a change that also affects Tauri or sidecar behavior.
- Forgetting
pnpm test:builtin-skillswhen skill assets or skill-related crates changed.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- workclaw-cleanup-executionSkill
- workclaw-implementation-strategySkill
- workclaw-release-prepSkill
- workclaw-release-publishSkill
- workclaw-release-readinessSkill
- workclaw-repo-hygiene-reviewSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finding-duplicate-functionsSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- mcp-cliSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- slack-messagingSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-superpowersSkill
- using-tmux-for-interactive-commandsSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

