agentleFS
hailneedhailneed/agent-blackbox/skills/timeline/SKILL.md

timeline

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Reconstruct what a coding agent actually did in a session — a flight record built from local logs (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI) with a turn-by-turn tool-call timeline, errors, denied calls, files changed and behaviour signals. Use when the user asks what happened in a session, what the agent did while they were away, why a session took so long, wants a handover summary of an agent run, says "what did it do", "show the timeline", "ne yaptı", "oturumda ne oldu", "uçuş kaydını çıkar", or runs /agent-blackbox:timeline [session]. Not for risk auditing across many sessions — that is agent-blackbox:risk. Not for reverting changes — that is agent-blackbox:undo.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions5 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 5

    1. AlexeyPerov/Unity-Open-MCP★ 17same name
    2. tykisgod/quick-question★ 12same name
    3. npow/claude-skills★ 4same name
    4. anthonysuherli/br8n★ 1same name
    5. chellehoniker/claude-code-storytelleros★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the log does not show it, do not assert it.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If the user named a session id, use it.

    line 18
  3. Very specific:

    Add --agent codex (or claude-code, gemini-cli) when the user names a tool.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Always finish with the state on disk: how many files changed, whether tests ran after the last edit, whether anything was committed.

    line 62
  5. Very specific:

    Keep it under 12 lines unless the user asked for a full document.

    line 73

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Flight record (timeline)

Rebuild one agent session from its local log: what was asked, what the agent ran, what broke, what changed on disk. Nothing is fetched and nothing is sent — the script only reads files that are already on this machine.

Language rule: write every user-facing output in the language the user is speaking with you. Evidence rule: every claim in the summary must point to an event number from the report. If the log does not show it, do not assert it.

Step 0 — Pick the session

If the user named a session id, use it. If they described one ("dünkü firewall oturumu"), list first and match on directory and time:

node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/blackbox.mjs" --list --days 7 --md

With no hint at all, use --session latest. If several sessions plausibly match, show the candidates and ask exactly one question. Requires Node.js 18+; if node is missing, stop and say so.

Step 1 — Build the record

node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/blackbox.mjs" --session <id|latest> --md

Add --agent codex (or claude-code, gemini-cli) when the user names a tool. Read the whole output before writing anything. If the header says the schema is unverified, say so once in the reply — the parse may be incomplete.

Step 2 — Read it as a story, not a table

The report gives you turns, each with the user's ask and the calls that followed. For each turn work out:

  • What was actually attempted — group the calls into 1–3 phrases ("read the config, patched the migration, ran the tests"), do not restate the tool list.
  • Where it went wrong — errors and denied calls; name the first failure in a chain, not the last, because the later ones are usually consequences.
  • What it cost — wall-clock, retry loops, repeated edits to the same file.
  • What it left behind — files changed, whether anything verified them.

Step 3 — Answer the question that was actually asked

Match the shape of the reply to the ask:

The user wantsGive them
"what did it do?"5–10 lines, chronological, one line per phase, ending with disk state
a handover / continuationwhat is done, what is half-done, what the next step is, with event numbers
"why did it take so long?"the three biggest time sinks with durations, then the cause
"why did it fail?"the first failure, what it retried, and what it never tried

Always finish with the state on disk: how many files changed, whether tests ran after the last edit, whether anything was committed. That is the part the user cannot see.

Step 4 — Save only if it is worth saving

Handover and post-mortem summaries get written to ~/.agentlens/blackbox/timeline-<slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md (expand the home directory yourself; never pass a literal ~ to the script). A quick "what did it do" question is answered in chat and not saved. Say where you saved it.

Step 5 — Reply

Keep it under 12 lines unless the user asked for a full document. Close with one pointer only when it is genuinely relevant: /agent-blackbox:risk if the record shows destructive or outward-facing commands, /agent-blackbox:undo if files changed and nothing was committed. If the session is unremarkable, say that plainly instead of padding it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.