autopilot
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to run a whole queue of open work unattended — "autopilot", "run everything you can", "clear what you can while I am away", "full auto on my open items". Orchestrates the complete run as an explicit checklist: triage the queue into tiers, execute the autonomous pile without stopping, then close out with a gated list. Start here rather than at an individual phase when the request covers the whole run.
74 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zahidakhyar/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kimkon1011/orgiast-claude-rulestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lohi-ai/babysittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paramcodes/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jinjan21-lgtm/autopilottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ourostack/ouroboros-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review-bugbot, rename-chat and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
0mlkrizzz655335vSkillreview-bugbot
缺陷导向代码审查。用 Bugbot 子代理找 bug。
Also in 3 projects that use this
0mlkrizzz655335vSkillrename-chat
重命名当前聊天。按聊天内容改标题。"disable-model-invocation: true
Also in 3 projects that use this
Tsumugii24Skillsplit-to-prs
Split current work into small reviewable PRs. Use when the user asks to split a chat, set of changes, branch, or PR.
Also in 4 projects that use this
PandelisZSkillupdate-cli-config
View and modify Cursor CLI configuration settings in ~/.cursor/cli-config.json. Use when the user wants to change CLI settings, configure permissions, switch approval mode, enable vim mode, toggle display options, configure sandbox, or manage any CLI preferences.
Also in 3 projects that use this
32103210Skillmigrate-to-skills
Convert 'Applied intelligently' Cursor rules (.cursor/rules/*.mdc) and slash commands (.cursor/commands/*.md) to Agent Skills format (.cursor/skills/). Use when you want to migrate rules or commands to skills, convert .mdc rules to SKILL.md format, or consolidate commands into the skills directory.
Also in 3 projects that use this
32103210Skillupdate-cursor-settings
Modify Cursor/VSCode user settings in settings.json. Use when you want to change editor settings, preferences, configuration, themes, font size, tab size, format on save, auto save, keybindings, or any settings.json values.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from 32103210
- +1 more from 0mlkrizzz655335v
Other versions74 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 74
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex★ 34ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- H-mmer/pentest-agents★ 815same name
- Harry-kp/vortix★ 757same name
- nick-vels/skills★ 599same name
- yan-labs/yan-skills★ 232same name
- kentcdodds/kcd-skills★ 64same name
- Kanevry/session-orchestrator★ 53same name
64 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- close-out-the-runSkill
- execute-unattendedSkill
- run-to-completionSkill
- ship-configSkill
- shipSkill
- triage-for-autonomySkill
- ungate-queueSkill
- writing-execution-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 66 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Do this once before triage:
- Distinctive: line 33
Create one tracked todo per phase, in order:
- Distinctive: line 42
After finishing a batch, re-triage rather than following the original order blindly.
- Very specific: line 50
If the user is available and wants to clear blockers rather than have work done unattended, that is ungate-queue, not this.
- Very specific: line 56
Use triage-for-autonomy, execute-unattended, or close-out-the-run directly if you are already in a specific phase.
- Distinctive: line 60
When you begin working under this skill, lead your first substantive reply with "🏃✈️ autopilot:" so the user can see which plugin just …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 66 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
autopilot — the entry point for a whole unattended run
This skill orchestrates the complete run. It sequences three phase skills and adds the up-front kickoff. It does not duplicate their content.
Kickoff
Do this once before triage:
- Establish the resource picture. Find out what you actually have to spend — time, a request or token quota, a cost cap if one exists at all — by checking, not by assuming. Many setups have no cap, and in those the answer is simply "no limit to plan around". Never conclude you are blocked without looking: if the user's prompts are being answered, the pipe is working.
- Warm any delegate lanes. A delegate is not necessarily one thing: local inference and free/cheap remote APIs are two independent lanes, and a run can use either or both — including in parallel, when independent items are ready at the same time and each lane has spare capacity. Start whichever lane(s) exist in the background so the first delegation is not a cold start. Capture whatever address, port, or endpoint each warm-up reports.
Ask blocking questions about THE RUN — and only about the run. Scope, and permission for any push, publish, or confirmation-gated action. Ask for the ship-loop depth as one question — cleared through push, through merge to the default branch, through tag, or through release — rather than a bare yes to “may you push”, because the loop's later steps publish and a run with nobody present cannot widen its own permission when it reaches one. Do not stop for those again.
Ask the run's scope as one neutral question: a scoped run (an agreed set of items, and the repositories they may touch) or a whole-queue run (everything triage finds actionable). Both are equally legitimate; which fits depends on what the user intends that day, so neither is labelled recommended and neither is assumed when the answer is missing — no answer, no start. In a scoped run, record the agreed items and repositories where the run's goal lives, triage and execute only those, and report anything else you come across as "noticed, not touched" in the close-out.
The asymmetry that makes this work: kickoff questions are about the run; a question about a specific item discovered during triage becomes a gate on that item, never a kickoff question. Otherwise kickoff degenerates into interrogating sixty items one by one, which defeats the entire point of "clear what you can while I am away" — the user walks away precisely so they do not have to answer things.
The corollary cuts the other way and is just as important: a known question is a gate, and work sitting before that question is actionable. So an item that ends in a question is not thereby excluded from the run.
Contrast this with an attended run-to-completion, where the user is present: there, prefer surfacing and clearing gates as early as you can, because an answer is cheap and immediately unblocks work. Same plugin, opposite instinct, decided by whether anyone is there to answer.
The checklist
Create one tracked todo per phase, in order:
- Triage (
triage-for-autonomy) - Execute (
execute-unattended) - Close out (
close-out-the-run)
Work them in sequence. The checklist form matters because an orchestrator can only instruct, not force. A written checklist is what makes the sequence hold across a long run.
The loop
After finishing a batch, re-triage rather than following the original order blindly. New information changes tiers.
Hand-offs
If a persistent open-items store exists, that is the queue. If a local-execution capability or a free/cheap remote-API lane exists, route delegatable steps to whichever fits — by availability, by which is idle, or split across both when several independent items are ready together. If a reconciliation discipline exists, the closing phase uses it. None of these are required for autopilot to work.
Attended alternative
If the user is available and wants to clear blockers rather than have work done unattended, that is ungate-queue, not this.
That pass is deliberately narrow: it removes gates and records the answers, and does not do the work it releases. So expect it to hand back a set of newly-actionable items rather than finished ones — and expect the next run of this checklist to be where they actually get done. If a queue has just been ungated, re-triage before executing: the released items belong in the ranking with everything else.
When NOT to use this
Use triage-for-autonomy, execute-unattended, or close-out-the-run directly if you are already in a specific phase.
Branding (🏃)
When you begin working under this skill, lead your first substantive reply with "🏃✈️ autopilot:" so the user can see which plugin just became active and that this is an autopilot run — ✈️ is autopilot's own mark, the way 🚢 is the ship tool's.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

