agentleFS
h2coneh2cone/agent-packs/skills/git-commit/SKILL.md

git-commit

Skill0 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pulls from the tracked upstream, stages all changes, and commits them with an AI-generated multi-line message. Triggers on "commit", "generate commit message", "commit my changes", or "git commit".

  • Commits and pushes

174 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • klauswgSkill

    git-pr

    Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • mjun0812Skill

    github-pr-create

    Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    git-branch

    Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • klauswgSkill

    git-issue

    Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gologo13Skill

    git-push

    Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    github-pr-review

    Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If an upstream exists, run git pull --rebase --autostash.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    If the pull, rebase, or autostash fails or leaves unmerged paths (git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U), stop without staging/committing …

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    If no upstream is configured, skip the pull and say so.

    line 13
  4. Distinctive:

    Verify there are changes after pulling: git status --porcelain.

    line 14
  5. Distinctive:

    Read the staged diff for context: git diff --cached --stat and git diff --cached.

    line 16
  6. Distinctive:

    Commit with a real multi-line message:

    line 20
  7. Very specific:

    Don't add Co-Authored-By or tool attribution unless asked.

    line 38
  8. Distinctive:

    Never bypass a failed pull or unresolved conflict to create the commit.

    line 39
  9. Distinctive:

    Never git push — committing only.

    line 40

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Sync with the tracked upstream, stage everything, read the diff, write a good commit message, and commit.

Steps

  1. Inspect state and sync: git status --short --branch, then resolve the tracked upstream with git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name "@{upstream}".
    • If an upstream exists, run git pull --rebase --autostash.
    • If the pull, rebase, or autostash fails or leaves unmerged paths (git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U), stop without staging/committing and report the recovery state.
    • If no upstream is configured, skip the pull and say so.
  2. Verify there are changes after pulling: git status --porcelain. If empty, stop and say so.
  3. Stage all changes: git add -A.
  4. Read the staged diff for context: git diff --cached --stat and git diff --cached.
  5. Write the message:
    • Subject: concise, imperative, ≤50 chars. Conventional Commit prefix optional.
    • Body (when the change is non-trivial): blank line, then wrapped lines explaining what and why, not how.
  6. Commit with a real multi-line message:

    git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
    <subject>
    
    <body line>
    <body line>
    EOF
    )"
  7. Confirm with git log -1 --stat and git status --short --branch.

Rules

  • Plain text only — no markdown, code fences, or quotes inside the message.
  • Group unrelated changes into one coherent message; don't list every file.
  • Don't add Co-Authored-By or tool attribution unless asked.
  • Never bypass a failed pull or unresolved conflict to create the commit.
  • Never git push — committing only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.