agentleFS
guqiong96guqiong96/Lvllm/tests/AGENTS.md

Lvllm / tests

AGENTS.md475 starsChanged 12 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

- Test real objects on the lightest real path. Construct vLLM objects with their real constructors; do not stand them in with SimpleNamespace or MagicMock, set private attributes, or patch methods to reach a state. Mock only external services. Pick the cheapest setup that exercises the change: a layer or kernel test does not need vllm_runner, and single-rank parallel state is enough when parallelism is irrelevant. A fix to user-visible behavior needs at least one regression test through LLM (vllm_runner)…

1 other project uses a version of this; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 0 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Surging: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 1 new project
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 1 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. vllm-project/vllm★ 97k100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Show the failure before the fix: When the bug is reproducible, run the new test on the base commit (rebuild if the fix touches csrc/) and …

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Never buy a green CI: Do not add flaky/reruns, retry loops, skip, xfail, lowered thresholds, wider atol/rtol, or deletions to make a test …

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Deterministic and exact by construction: Use greedy or seeded sampling.

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

tests

  • Test real objects on the lightest real path. Construct vLLM objects with their real constructors; do not stand them in with SimpleNamespace or MagicMock, set private attributes, or patch methods to reach a state. Mock only external services. Pick the cheapest setup that exercises the change: a layer or kernel test does not need vllm_runner, and single-rank parallel state is enough when parallelism is irrelevant. A fix to user-visible behavior needs at least one regression test through LLM (vllm_runner) or RemoteOpenAIServer, with real weights when loading is involved. A test that only asserts assert_called* or "no exception" guards nothing.
  • Show the failure before the fix. When the bug is reproducible, run the new test on the base commit (rebuild if the fix touches csrc/) and confirm it fails for the reported reason, then passes with the fix. Paste both commands and the relevant output in the PR; "fails before" without output is not evidence.
  • Never buy a green CI. Do not add flaky/reruns, retry loops, skip, xfail, lowered thresholds, wider atol/rtol, or deletions to make a test pass. Find out whether the failure is caused by your change or also happens on main (.buildkite/scripts/rerun-test.sh, docs/contributing/ci/failures.md); the only exception is xfail(strict=True) linking an open issue for a bug on main.
  • Deterministic and exact by construction. Use greedy or seeded sampling. Assert equality where the result is exact (a change that must not alter output is compared against the code it replaces, not another reference), and keep tolerances as tight as the math allows. vLLM is not batch invariant by default: batch size, chunked prefill, prefix caching, backend, and TP size can flip greedy tokens, so compare against a reference with check_logprobs_close / check_embeddings_close, or require VLLM_BATCH_INVARIANT=1 for exact equality. Never synchronize with a fixed sleep; poll an explicit condition with a timeout, and force race orderings with events.
  • No personal-account checkpoints. Tests must not load models from personal Hugging Face accounts; see docs/contributing/model/tests.md (Model loading) for moving them into vllm-project.
  • Make sure CI runs it. A test no step in .buildkite/test_areas/*.yaml selects never runs, which looks like passing. Check that the step's commands and pytest markers (core_model, slow_test, distributed) select the test and its source_file_dependencies cover the changed files; update the step if not. When a command names more than one test path (including --ignore / --deselect), write it as a >- block with pytest -v -s on the first line and one path per line, so concurrent PRs adding tests do not conflict on the same line.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.