positive-reply-scoring
Skill759 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pulls replies from a Smartlead campaign, classifies each as positive/neutral/negative/OOO/bounce/unsubscribe using Claude, and reports the positive reply rate — the north-star metric for cold email. Use when the user wants to know if a campaign is actually working (not just getting replies, but getting the RIGHT replies). Triggers on "score my replies", "how's campaign X doing", "positive reply rate", "is this campaign working".
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Every reply is classified into exactly one bucket:
- Distinctive: line 55
Run the fetch script:
- Distinctive: line 148
Write aggregate results to:
- Distinctive: line 166
After a campaign has run for at least 14 days (otherwise sample is too small)
- Distinctive: line 167
When comparing two campaigns in an experiment (use the same cutoff date for both)
- Distinctive: line 169
Before deciding to kill or scale a campaign
- Distinctive: line 177
Classify only FIRST reply per lead: If a lead replied, you replied, they replied again — only the first reply is the signal.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Positive Reply Scoring
Reply rate tells you if people are paying attention. Positive reply rate tells you if they want what you're selling. This skill computes the second.
Why this exists
A campaign can get 5% reply rate and still be a disaster. If 90% of those replies are "unsubscribe" and "not a fit," you're burning your domains for nothing.
The metric that matters is:
positive_reply_rate = positive_replies / total_sentCompared side-by-side:
- Campaign A: 1% reply rate, 70% positive → 0.7% positive reply rate
- Campaign B: 5% reply rate, 10% positive → 0.5% positive reply rate
- Campaign A wins.
Classification schema
Every reply is classified into exactly one bucket:
| Label | Meaning | Count as "positive"? |
positive_interested | "Yes, tell me more" or booked a meeting | ✅ |
positive_soft | "Send more info" / "reach out in Q3" / info request | ✅ |
positive_referral | "Not me, but talk to X" | ✅ (referral is high-value) |
neutral_question | Clarifying question, no commitment yet | ❌ (optional — some score as half) |
negative_notnow | "Not right now, maybe later" | ❌ |
negative_notfit | "Not a fit" / "we don't need this" | ❌ |
negative_hostile | Angry reply, complaint, report | ❌ (and track separately as risk signal) |
unsubscribe | Explicit opt-out | ❌ |
ooo | Out-of-office auto-reply | ❌ (exclude from denominators) |
bounce | Technical bounce | ❌ (exclude from denominators) |
other | Can't tell | ❌ |
Positive reply rate = (positive_interested + positive_soft + positive_referral) / total_sent
Inputs
- Smartlead API key (env:
SMARTLEAD_API_KEY) - Campaign ID to score
- Optional: client_id (if using a sub-client setup)
- Optional: date range (defaults to full campaign)
Steps
1. Fetch all leads + replies from the campaign
Run the fetch script:
npx tsx scripts/fetch-campaign-replies.ts --campaign-id=12345 --out=/tmp/replies.jsonThis walks /campaigns/{id}/leads paginated, identifies leads with replies (has_reply = true), then fetches /campaigns/{id}/leads/{lead_id}/message-history for each, and writes them to a JSON file with one object per reply.
Output schema per reply:
{
"lead_id": "...",
"email": "...",
"lead_first_name": "...",
"company": "...",
"reply_time": "ISO timestamp",
"reply_subject": "...",
"reply_body": "... full text ...",
"sequence_step": 1
}2. Classify replies in the Claude Code conversation
Once the JSON is written, Claude (the one running this skill) reads the file and classifies each reply. For speed, fan out in batches of 20-30 via the Task tool (see personalization-subagent-pattern skill for fan-out mechanics).
Classification prompt (per batch):
Classify each reply as one of:
- positive_interested, positive_soft, positive_referral
- neutral_question
- negative_notnow, negative_notfit, negative_hostile
- unsubscribe, ooo, bounce, other
For each reply, output: { lead_id, label, confidence: 0.0-1.0, one_line_reason }
Rules:
- OOO auto-replies ("I'm out of office") → ooo
- Bounces (delivery failure messages) → bounce
- "Take me off your list", "unsubscribe", "STOP" → unsubscribe
- "Not interested", "not a fit" → negative_notfit
- "Not right now, circle back in Q3" → negative_notnow
- "Try [other person]" → positive_referral
- "Send more info" or "Tell me more" → positive_soft
- "Yes, let's book a call", "what times work" → positive_interested
- Insults, reports, legal threats → negative_hostile
If confidence < 0.7, label as `other`.3. Aggregate + compute rates
Run the aggregator:
npx tsx scripts/aggregate-scores.ts --replies=/tmp/classified-replies.json --campaign-id=12345Output (to stdout + optional --out):
Campaign 12345 — Positive Reply Scoring
Total sent: 5,284
Total replies: 212 (4.01%)
ooo/bounce (excluded): 34
Net replies: 178
Breakdown:
positive_interested: 22
positive_soft: 31
positive_referral: 8
neutral_question: 14
negative_notnow: 28
negative_notfit: 52
negative_hostile: 3
unsubscribe: 20
other: 0
Positive reply rate: 1.15% (61 / 5,284)
Positive % of replies: 34.3% (61 / 178)
Negative hostile risk: 0.06% (3 / 5,284)
Unsub rate: 0.38% (20 / 5,284)
Benchmarks (B2B cold email):
Good positive reply rate: ≥1%
Great: ≥2%
Hostile >0.3% or unsub >2% → deliverability risk, pause campaign4. Save to disk
Write aggregate results to:
~/cold-email-ai-skills/profiles/<business-slug>/scores/<campaign-id>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.jsonThis builds a history so you can trend positive reply rate over campaigns.
5. Flag action items
At the end, surface:
- Positive replies that need a human response — list the top 10
positive_interestedleads and their reply bodies. The user should reply to these within 30 seconds of seeing this report. - Referrals that need follow-up —
positive_referrallabels. Add the referred contacts to a new outreach list. - Hostile flags — any
negative_hostilereplies. Read them manually; consider pausing the inbox if someone is genuinely angry. - Unsubscribes — confirm they're globally suppressed (Smartlead does this automatically, but double-check).
When to use this skill
- After a campaign has run for at least 14 days (otherwise sample is too small)
- When comparing two campaigns in an experiment (use the same cutoff date for both)
- Weekly as a quality check on running campaigns
- Before deciding to kill or scale a campaign
Common gotchas
- Don't trust reply rate alone. A 5% reply rate from spam-trap replies and unsubscribes is worse than a 2% reply rate from real buyers.
- Exclude OOO + bounce from denominators. They're not real replies. The script does this automatically.
- Smartlead's built-in AI categorization exists but is less controllable. This skill uses Claude directly for transparency and prompt-tunable classification.
- Small samples lie. Below ~500 sent, the positive reply rate has too much noise. Wait for more volume before declaring winners/losers.
- Classify only FIRST reply per lead. If a lead replied, you replied, they replied again — only the first reply is the signal. Later messages are the conversation, not the scoring.
What to do next
Respond to every positive_interested reply within 30 seconds of seeing it. Then /experiment-design to plan the next iteration based on what worked.
If positive reply rate is <1% after 200+ sends: the 1% rule failed. Run /email-deliverability-audit (are you reaching the inbox?) (check for vague CTAs, generic first lines, em dashes).
Or wait: this skill is the Wednesday task in /cold-email-weekly-rhythm. Run it weekly going forward.
Related skills
/experiment-design— uses positive reply rate as the success metric/email-deliverability-audit— if hostile + unsub are elevated, run this next/cold-email-starter-kit→10-reply-handling.mdfor what to do with the positive replies once flagged
Scripts
scripts/fetch-campaign-replies.ts— pulls replies via Smartlead APIscripts/aggregate-scores.ts— computes rates from classified JSON
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- automatewithuday/GTM-Skills★ 189% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- creatop-gtm/apollo-operator★ 8same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository51 other files it gives its agents.
- auto-research-publicSkill
- blitz-list-builderSkill
- campaign-copywritingSkill
- campaign-strategySkill
- cold-email-kickoffSkill
- cold-email-starter-kitSkill
- cold-email-weekly-rhythmSkill
- competitor-engagersSkill
- deliverability-incident-responseSkill
- deliverability-test-publicSkill
- disco-likeSkill
- email-deliverability-auditSkill
- experiment-designSkill
- google-maps-list-builderSkill
- icp-onboardingSkill
- icp-prompt-builderSkill
- inbox-lifecycle-managerSkill
- lead-magnet-brainstormSkill
- list-builderSkill
- list-expanderSkill
- list-quality-scorecardSkill
- perfect-company-listSkill
- personalization-subagent-patternSkill
- clay-playbooksSkill
- playbook-ad-librarySkill
- playbook-ai-specificitySkill
- playbook-case-study-pageSkill
- playbook-company-name-cleaningSkill
- playbook-creative-ideasSkill
- playbook-first-name-cleaningSkill
- playbook-fundraisingSkill
- playbook-google-site-searchSkill
- playbook-hiring-surgeSkill
- playbook-job-posting-languageSkill
- playbook-linkedin-engagementSkill
- playbook-lookalikesSkill
- playbook-name-to-other-prospectsSkill
- playbook-new-in-roleSkill
- playbook-pricing-pageSkill
- playbook-social-link-findingSkill
- playbook-social-postsSkill
- playbook-tech-on-websiteSkill
- playbook-warm-introsSkill
- prospeo-full-exportSkill
- prospeo-search-apiSkill
- smartlead-apiSkill
- smartlead-campaign-upload-publicSkill
- smartlead-inbox-managerSkill
- smartlead-spintaxSkill
- spam-word-checkerSkill
- zapmail-domain-setup-publicSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

