hex-plan
Skill15 starsChanged 19 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Tiered multi-agent planning orchestrator — decomposes a feature, issue, or PR into a contract-first TDD plan through discover, research, design, decompose, and adversarial-review phases. Use for multi-step feature planning, task decomposition, swarm planning, multi-perspective research, meta-plan preview, or ADR scaffolding. Tier (low|medium|high|xhigh|max, auto by default) scales research depth, whether an architect designs, and review breadth.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/research/hooks_vendor_reports/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-docs-cleanupSkill
- docs-instrumentSkill
- docs-planSkill
- docs-reviewSkill
- hex-architectSkill
- hex-coreSkill
- hex-discussSkill
- hex-executeSkill
- hex-finalizeSkill
- hex-initSkill
- hex-loopSkill
- hex-retroSkill
- hex-reviewSkill
- nox-reviewSkill
- bugfixSkill
- builderSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-checkSkill
- code-docs-cleanupSkill
- commitSkill
- docs-instrumentSkill
- docs-planSkill
- docs-reviewSkill
- docsSkill
- finalizeSkill
- hex-architectSkill
- hex-coreSkill
- hex-discussSkill
- hex-executeSkill
- hex-finalizeSkill
- hex-initSkill
- hex-loopSkill
- hex-planSkill
- hex-retroSkill
- hex-reviewSkill
- meta-maintain-configSkill
- meta-validate-contextSkill
- nextSkill
- nox-reviewSkill
- qa-engineerSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- upstream-refreshSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
If hex-core is not installed: grim add ghcr.io/michael-herwig/arcana/hex-core:latest.
- Very specific: line 74
If the resolved hex.md carries a Federation lead: bullet, halt per memory.md § Location and resolution — this repo is a federation …
- Distinctive: line 80
If the target is a GitHub reference, fetch its title, body, labels, and (for PRs) file list, in this order of preference:
- Very specific: line 94
Read classify.md. Apply its tier signals and overlay triggers to the prompt plus any fetched GitHub context.
- Very specific: line 124
Never split this into sequential questions.
- Very specific: line 164
Every spawn line carries its source (tier baseline / classifier / hex.md preference / user flag) per spawn-selection precedence.
- Very specific: line 176
Read workflows.hex-plan.<tier> from the resolved config first.
- Very specific: line 230
Location: Write the plan where the project's documented plan/ADR conventions say (discovered from project context, cached in hex.md › …
- Distinctive: line 242
Status block: Every plan opens with a self-contained status block the execute and review skills read and mutate — no external state file:
- Distinctive: line 299
Every task carries testable acceptance criteria — no vague behaviors.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
hex-plan — Planning Orchestrator
Thin dispatcher. It parses arguments, classifies the target's tier, resolves
overlays, runs the single meta-plan approval gate, announces the resolved
config, and hands off to the matching tier file. The phase plans live in
the five tier-<tier>.md files; the shared vocabulary
(tiers, the Review-Fix Loop, worker roles, model classes, the memory file)
lives in the hex-core reference library and is linked here, never
copied.
Shared contracts:
protocol.md ·
workers.md ·
models.md ·
memory.md.
If hex-core is not installed: grim add ghcr.io/michael-herwig/arcana/hex-core:latest.
Argument syntax
/hex-plan [tier] <target> [flags]- tier (optional):
low | medium | high | xhigh | max | auto. Defaultauto— the classifier picks the lowest-fit tier,low…xhigh(classify.md); a higher tier needs the user.maxis explicit only —--tier=max, or a plan whose Status block saysTier: max; the classifier never emits it (protocol.md). - target (one of):
- free-text prompt;
<N>or#<N>— a number; probe PR first, fall back to issue;PR <N>/pull/<N>— an explicit pull request;issue <N>/issues/<N>— an explicit issue;- a full GitHub URL
https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/(pull|issues)/<N>.
- flags (before the target, by convention):
--architect=inline|on— override the Design phase (seeoverlays.md).--research=skip|1|3— override Research breadth.--adversary/--no-adversary— force the cross-model plan-artifact pass on or off.--dry-run— make the meta-plan gate block for explicit approval and stop there (preview only, no workers launched).
Dispatch
The outer loop every hex orchestrator shares
(protocol.md):
1. Parse arguments and resolve memory
Parse the tier, target, and flags. Locate .agents/memory/hex.md by
searching upward from the working directory; a missing file is normal
(memory.md) —
fall back to shipped defaults and note that /hex-init can create one. When
present, read hex.md › Pointers for cached locations (where verification
and plan/ADR conventions are documented; verify on consumption, re-point on
a miss), hex.md › Preferences for the instantiated model matrix, the
adversary skill name, limits, and always-on perspectives, and
hex.md › Memory for any active plan already in flight. Product context
(what the product is, users, related repos, research keywords) lives in
project context, located via hex.md › Pointers.
If the resolved hex.md carries a Federation lead: bullet, halt per
memory.md § Location and resolution
— this repo is a federation satellite and its memory is not the plan's.
2. Resolve the target
If the target is a GitHub reference, fetch its title, body, labels, and (for PRs) file list, in this order of preference:
- the client's GitHub MCP tools (PR/issue read) when it exposes them;
- the
ghCLI (gh pr view/gh issue view --json title,body,comments,labels,files) as fallback; - neither available — treat the input as free text and continue.
Probe order for a bare <N>/#<N> is a PR then an issue; PRs and issues are
equal-class targets. The fetched body and labels feed classification; a PR's
file list feeds the Discover scope, not the tier decision.
3. Classify (only when tier is auto)
Read classify.md. Apply its tier signals and overlay
triggers to the prompt plus any fetched GitHub context. It emits a candidate
tier (only low, medium, high, or xhigh), a confidence flag, and an overlay
set. Low confidence forces the gate in step 5. Never ask a mid-flow question
during classification — ambiguity is resolved at the single gate.
4. Resolve overlays
Final config = the tier's baseline from overlays.md +
classifier-inferred overlays + hex.md › Preferences hints + user flags.
Later wins;
user flags always override (see
protocol.md).
5. Meta-plan gate (the single approval point)
Exactly one gate, before any worker launches
(protocol.md).
Its weight scales:
- Confident
low/medium/high— announce the resolved config (step 6) and proceed; the user can still abort. An explicit user tier always counts as confident — the classifier never ran. xhighormaxtier, low-confidence classification, or--dry-run— block for explicit approval.
On a client with a native plan-approval mechanism, use it. Otherwise
present the announce block as one structured question (approve / adjust /
cancel). The gate is also where the user can add or drop perspectives, choose
research axes, and adjust models. On adjust, re-resolve and re-present once.
Never split this into sequential questions. Open questions are presented
together with their Recommended: <answer> — <reason> line; a plain
approval accepts every recommendation as-is
(the meta-plan approval gate).
6. Announce the resolved config
Print the resolved config with per-axis source attribution before loading the
tier file (format:
protocol.md):
hex-plan
Tier: high (auto — classifier: new subcommand, 2 areas)
Overlays: architect=inline (accepted ADR covers the design)
research=1 (tier baseline)
adversary=off (tier baseline)
Spawn set:
architecture-explorer (tier baseline)
explorer ×3 (tier baseline)
researcher ×1 (overlay research=1)
reviewer: spec (tier baseline)
Models: standard default (models.md)
Adversary: off
Degraded: no — subagent spawning availableThe announce block prints one config-disclosure line per change a
hex.md › Preferences block makes; the full trigger set is defined once in
protocol.md § the meta-plan approval gate.
For this skill, for example:
[project-redefined: Research.researcher 1→3 (hex.md tiers)]
[architect dropped — phase ceiling 3 reached]
[Review batched 2+2 — concurrency cap 4 (hex.md)]
Error: never [reviewer:security] refused (hex.md preference)
Fix: see config.md#merge-rules for the attestation requirementEvery spawn line carries its source (tier baseline / classifier /
hex.md preference / user flag) per
spawn-selection precedence.
Model names above are class placeholders — shipped files never hardcode
literals; the running orchestrator resolves and prints each spawn's
literal model per the
Models line contract. On a client that cannot spawn subagents, announce
Degraded: inline workers and run each worker prompt inline and sequentially
(protocol.md).
7. Dispatch to the tier file
Read workflows.hex-plan.<tier> from the resolved config first. When set and
the named file passes the seven validation checks
(config.md § Workflows), Read
that forked file in place of the shipped one; on validation failure or when
unset, Read the matching tier-{low,medium,high,xhigh,max}.md — config.md owns the
check list and the on-failure fallback. Announce which ran: Workflow: shipped
tier-<tier>.md, or for a fork, Workflow: <path> (forked from <shipped tier
file> @ <stamped version>). Execute the loaded file's phase plan; no phase
content is duplicated in this file.
Worker assignment (shared across tiers)
Roles are indexed in workers.md;
the orchestrator loads a full persona (spawn-prompt template, output
contract) only for roles in the resolved spawn set
(spawn-selection precedence).
The model class for each role × tier is in
models.md. This table maps roles to
planning phases; the tier files set the actual counts.
| Phase | Role | Count | Purpose |
| Discover | architecture-explorer | 0–1 | Map the current architecture, dependencies, reusable code |
| Discover | explorer | 1–4 | Deep-dive each involved area |
| Research | researcher | 0–1 (3 only when the user asks) | Technology / patterns / domain landscape |
| Design | architect | 0–1 | ADR or system design — only for a new one-way-door decision no accepted ADR covers |
| Review | reviewer (focus spec) | 1 | Plan ↔ design consistency; for a plan built from an accepted ADR, the decomposition only |
| Review | architect | 0–1 | Trade-off honesty (new one-way door with no ADR, or the user asks) |
| Review | researcher | 0–1 | SOTA / known-pitfall gap check (same condition) |
| Adversary | configured adversary skill (plan-artifact) | 0–1 | Cross-model review (same condition) |
A project's tiers.hex-plan.<tier>.counts can override any Count cell above
against the baseline this table sets
(config.md § Merge rules).
Concurrency cap and degraded mode:
protocol.md. The
adversary skill name comes from hex.md › Preferences
(adversary contract);
codex-adversary is only an example value.
Project rules and conventions
hex never carries a hardcoded rule or subsystem table. Every phase that needs
the project's invariants, verification command, or artifact conventions
discovers them from project context (the client's ambient instructions /
project rules), cached in the Pointers section of
.agents/memory/hex.md
(memory.md). "Verify"
anywhere below means run the project's documented verification
(verify.md).
The plan artifact
Location. Write the plan where the project's documented plan/ADR
conventions say (discovered from project context, cached in
hex.md › Pointers). When nothing is documented, use the default artifact
home .agents/plans/
(memory.md).
Record the active-plan pointer in hex.md › Memory. The plan template shipped
with /hex-init is the scaffold; the project's own format wins when it has
one. A plan carrying a Repo column lives in the lead only — one
artifact, one Status block — with its active-plan pointer recorded solely in
the lead's hex.md › Memory
(memory.md).
Status block. Every plan opens with a self-contained status block the execute and review skills read and mutate — no external state file:
## Status
- State: plan-approved <!-- planning → plan-approved → executing → review → done -->
- Tier: high
- Tier-grammar: 5
- Updated: 2026-07-19
- Next: /hex-execute <this plan path>hex-plan initializes it at plan-approved on handoff, writes
- Tier-grammar: 5 (the tier grammar the Tier: value was written in,
protocol.md § Tier grammar,
adr_0017 C-997) into every new plan's Status block, and records the pointer
in hex.md › Memory; /hex-execute advances State and Next as it runs.
Required content (every tier — the tier files scale depth, not presence):
- Component contracts — the public surface touched (types, signatures,
error variants) with expected behavior and edge cases, testable enough that
a tester could write failing tests from them without reading any code.
Numbered
C-001, C-002, …; UX scenarios below are numberedS-001, S-002, …— both are the coverage join keys checked at review and convergence (protocol.md). - User-experience scenarios — action → expected outcome → error cases for each user-facing behavior.
- Contract wave — the stubs plus contract tests for every pipeline, committed once before any pipeline starts. Contract-first TDD runs inside each step (Stub → Specify → Implement), never as plan-level phases. A one-pipeline plan has no contract wave.
- Pipelines — the plan is a few pipelines cut along contracts, each an
ordered chain of steps; cutting rules and the table's columns are in
decompose.md. A Parallelization table with one row per pipeline (id, repo, scope citing the C-/S- IDs it covers, expected files, wave, depends-on, marks, status — initializedpending), the steps of each pipeline as an ordered list of small briefs, a wave-grouped mermaidgraph TDas its visual index (the table stays canonical), the critical path, a "Shippable after wave: N" line (tier medium and below exempt — one pipeline), and — when fewer parallel pipelines than file-disjointness allows — a one-line justification (worktree.md). - Marks — rare, set only where the author knows better than the defaults;
hardon at most one pipeline in four,reviewon a pipeline that earns its own review (decompose.md,models.md). Everything else runsstandard. - Open questions — unresolved ambiguities as
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION: …]markers, hard cap 3. More than three means the target is underspecified; raise it at the gate rather than guessing.
Constraints
- Every task carries testable acceptance criteria — no vague behaviors.
- Discover runs at every tier — never assume context.
- Each artifact is reviewed once; research is never repeated. A plan built from an accepted ADR (or a discussion handed off with one) never re-runs research or an architect on that ADR's decisions, and its single reviewer checks only the decomposition — contracts testable, pipelines cut cleanly along contracts, steps sized for a fresh agent (plan-artifact scope).
- Never skip Review; never exceed the concurrency cap
(
protocol.md). - No mid-flow questions — ambiguity is resolved at the single gate.
- Persist substantial research (more than a paragraph) as a research artifact in the convention-resolved location.
- Always include component contracts, UX scenarios with error cases, and the Parallelization section.
- Always initialize the plan's Status block and record the active-plan
pointer in
hex.md › Memory. - Constitution gate — when project context names a constitution (cached
in
hex.md › Pointers), the Design and Review phases gate the plan against it (protocol.md); violations need a Constitution Deviations row. - Never commit and never push — this skill plans only.
- Upkeep (
protocol.md): as the final phase, re-point anyhex.md › Pointersentry this run revealed as drifted (a changed verification command, a new artifact home) and updatehex.md › Memory; a perspective gap belongs inhex.md › Memoryas a note for the next/hex-initrun, never written tohex.md › Preferencesdirectly.
Handoff
The handoff contract applies: this block is the run's required final message; one optional proceed question may follow it.
## Plan Complete: <feature | "Resolves #N">
### Classification
- Scope: small | medium | large
- Reversibility: two-way | one-way (medium) | one-way (high)
- Tier: low | medium | high | xhigh | max
- Overlays: architect=<inline|on>, research=<skip|1|3>, adversary=<on|off>
### Artifacts
- <plan path> (Status block initialized; active-plan pointer in hex.md › Memory)
- <research artifact path(s)>
- <ADR path> (one-way-door only)
### Pipelines (for /hex-execute)
- Contract wave: stubs and contract tests to commit first (none for one pipeline)
- Parallelization: <N> pipelines, <M> steps in <W> waves; critical path <pipeline a → pipeline b>; marks: <K> `hard`, <J> `review`
### Deferred findings (need human judgment)
- Review panel: …
- Cross-model review: …
### Next step
/hex-execute <plan path>Consumers: /hex-execute (the plan artifact); the human (deferred findings).
$ARGUMENTS
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

