test-helper
Skill38 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run and analyze test results. Use when the user asks to run tests, check test coverage, or verify their changes pass.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- auto-formatSkill
- review-stagedSkill
- review-stagedSkill
- container-auditSkill
- setup-projectSkill
- check-licensesSkill
- project-setupSkill
- pr-summarySkill
- generate-readmeSkill
- ssh-helperSkill
- system-healthSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Run the project's test suite and provide a summary of results.
- Distinctive: line 15
Run the test suite with verbose output
- Distinctive: line 16
If tests fail, analyze the failures and suggest fixes
- Distinctive: line 42
If available, highlight files with low coverage.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Helper Skill
Run the project's test suite and provide a summary of results.
Process
- Detect the test framework (pytest, jest, vitest, go test, etc.)
- Run the test suite with verbose output
- If tests fail, analyze the failures and suggest fixes
- Report coverage gaps if a coverage tool is configured
Running Tests
For Python projects, run:
cd ${PROJECT_DIR} && python -m pytest -vFor Node.js projects, run:
npm testOutput Format
Test Results
Summary of pass/fail counts.
Failures
For each failure: test name, error message, and suggested fix.
Coverage
If available, highlight files with low coverage.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

