wrap-up
Skill20 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
After implementing, commit and finish your work
61 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PaulRBerg/dot-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- adeonir/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Memolok/Claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- bas1l/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- kiloloop/oacp-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use refine, doctor and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AlexPEClubSkillrefine
Always use when the user wants to discuss an exsiting feature or specification. Open an existing feature spec to improve, extend, or fundamentally challenge it. Pass the feature ID as argument (e.g. /refine PROJ-2).
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilldoctor
Diagnose an Amplifier CLI environment through the CLI doctor agent. USE WHEN a user requests CLI runtime, settings or missing-capability inspection. DO NOT USE for project bugs or other hosts.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillsync
Sync the current session branch with its upstream branch, or publish the current session branch to a remote. Use when the user asks to sync a branch, pull latest changes, rebase onto upstream, push current branch, publish branch, or set upstream.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkillbrainstorm
Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsecurity-scan
Use for a standard, single-pass security audit of an entire repository or a scoped path, package, folder, or submodule with no diff to review. This is the default repository scan. Do not use for PR, commit, branch, or working-tree diffs, or for deep, multi-pass scans.
Also in 3 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkillinterview-me
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions61 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 61
- rohitg00/pro-workflow★ 2.9ksame name
- anthropics/launch-your-agent★ 1ksame name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- ianlkl11234s/mini-taiwan-pulse★ 546same name
- aspi6246/Claude-Code-Skills-for-Academics★ 153same name
- PaulRBerg/agent-skills★ 104same name
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skills★ 79same name
- jonathanmalkin/jules★ 65same name
- simoncorry/foundry★ 39same name
- alxyrgin/health-os★ 38same name
51 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- breakdownSkill
- bug-investigationSkill
- code-review-adversarialSkill
- code-review-multiSkill
- code-review-with-followupSkill
- document-changesSkill
- grillingSkill
- type-test-codeSkill
- explain-changesSkill
- github-actions-ciSkill
- github-appSkill
- github-ticketsSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- implement-simpleSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-ttcSkill
- orchestrationSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- review-and-wrap-upSkill
- verusSkill
- specSkill
- ticketsSkill
- update-working-copySkill
- verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 6
Ensure you are on a branch at the apropriate location.
- Distinctive: line 8
Do a fetch of the origin repo to see if there have been updates.
- Very specific: line 12
Use the /document-changes skill to help record your changes in commit messages and pull requests.
- Distinctive: line 14
Do the following if your instructions authorize/direct it and the capability is available.
- Distinctive: line 19
When fixing CI failures, if the PR has not yet been reviewed, continue to squash commits together and force push the branch.
- Distinctive: line 20
If the PR has been reviewed, generate a single squash commit message to be used when the PR is merged.
- Distinctive: line 22
Ask the user whether to create tickets/issues for out of scope work brought up:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ensure you are on a branch at the apropriate location. This is usually the tip of main. Do a fetch of the origin repo to see if there have been updates.
Commit your work.
Squash your commits down to a concise history useful for future viewers of history (usually just 1 commit).
Use the /document-changes skill to help record your changes in commit messages and pull requests.
Do the following if your instructions authorize/direct it and the capability is available.
- Generate a
/pull-request - Watch for CI success
For a multi-commit Pull Request, generate a combined commit message that can be used in a squash merge. When fixing CI failures, if the PR has not yet been reviewed, continue to squash commits together and force push the branch. If the PR has been reviewed, generate a single squash commit message to be used when the PR is merged.
Ask the user whether to create tickets/issues for out of scope work brought up:
- Unrelated defects
- Small related features/enhancements
- Improving the software development process- altering documentation or skills to streamline agent usage
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

