spec
Skill276 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Maintain RFC and ADR artifacts without implementation work
168 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- varelaia/claude-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mrlemoos/galiciatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- standardagents/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Surething-io/cockpittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use backprop, ios-clean and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JuliusBrusseeSkillbackprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-fix
Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
bastosSkillios-design-review
Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".
Also in 5 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 7 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkilldocument-generate
Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Saqlain-811
Other versions168 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 168
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-react-native★ 1.8ksame name
- JuliusBrussee/cavekit★ 1.1ksame name
- kdlbs/kandev★ 1.1ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-dart★ 878same name
- poshan0126/dotclaude★ 871same name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- SparkDevNetwork/Rock★ 701same name
- hyperlink-academy/leaflet★ 527same name
- strands-agents/box★ 503same name
158 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adr-writerSkill
- commitSkill
- decision-analysisSkill
- detachSkill
- discussSkill
- govSkill
- guard-writerSkill
- initSkill
- migrateSkill
- quickSkill
- rfc-writerSkill
- wi-writerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 145 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Read artifacts with show; add --history only when obsolete content matters.
- Very specific: line 23
Use govctl <resource> --help for current syntax.
- Very specific: line 27
Do not write code, create Work Items, or advance an RFC beyond spec.
- Very specific: line 30
Do not edit gov/ files directly.
- Distinctive: line 32
Ask the user before any lifecycle or destructive artifact operation (accept, reject, finalize, advance, bump, deprecate, supersede, delete) …
- Distinctive: line 35
Stop a lifecycle mutation when you cannot establish the phase, sealed baseline, or recovery path it depends on.
- Very specific: line 50
Follow rfc-writer or adr-writer.
- Distinctive: line 56
Read the RFC's phase and the rules in [[RFC-0000:C-PHASE-LIFECYCLE]] and [[RFC-0002:C-LIFECYCLE-VERBS]] before editing:
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not edit or bump deprecated RFCs.
- Distinctive: line 80
Leave unapproved artifacts in their current draft or proposed state.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 145 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Specification Maintenance
Maintain governance artifacts for $ARGUMENTS without writing code or creating
execution work.
Discovery
govctl status
govctl search <topic>
govctl rfc list
govctl adr listRead artifacts with show; add --history only when obsolete content matters.
Use govctl <resource> --help for current syntax.
Hard Stops
- Do not write code, create Work Items, or advance an RFC beyond
spec. - RFCs own obligations, ADRs own design rationale, and Work Items own execution scope. Keep implementation plans out of RFCs and ADRs.
- Do not edit
gov/files directly; use govctl commands. Clause operations use the rootgovctl clausenamespace. - Ask the user before any lifecycle or destructive artifact operation (accept, reject, finalize, advance, bump, deprecate, supersede, delete) unless the request already authorizes it.
- Stop a lifecycle mutation when you cannot establish the phase, sealed baseline, or recovery path it depends on.
- Hand off to
discussorgovwhen a "clarification" changes behavior, the design is unresolved, or code is required.
Classify The Change
| Change | Path |
| Clarify an obligation, behavior unchanged | Edit and review the RFC |
| Add, change, deprecate, or remove behavior | Amend the RFC, then hand code to gov |
| Refine rationale or alternatives | Edit and review the ADR |
| Open design question | Hand off to discuss |
| Metadata or reference fix | Edit the owning artifact |
Follow rfc-writer or adr-writer. Before a lifecycle transition on
substantively changed content, run rfc-reviewer, adr-reviewer, or
wi-reviewer as appropriate.
RFC Lifecycle
Read the RFC's phase and the rules in [[RFC-0000:C-PHASE-LIFECYCLE]] and [[RFC-0002:C-LIFECYCLE-VERBS]] before editing:
- A draft RFC is finalized, never bumped.
- A normative RFC in
specis still its open candidate; do not bump it just to retarget that candidate. - Content edits after
specneed an authorized version bump before further phase progression. - A post-
specRFC with no trustworthy sealed baseline needs migration or a restore from version control, not an inferred bump. - Do not edit or bump deprecated RFCs.
- Clause
sinceis lifecycle-owned; use Clause lifecycle commands. Current-version changelog corrections use the changelog edit path and do not replace an amendment or bump.
Done When
- each artifact stays within its authority and its lifecycle state is explicit;
- its reviewer has no unresolved critical finding;
govctl checkpasses and affected projections are rendered; and- the final response names changed artifacts, lifecycle state, review result,
and the next workflow:
discussfor open design,govfor code,quickfor unrelated non-behavioral cleanup, orcommitfor VCS.
Leave unapproved artifacts in their current draft or proposed state.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

