agentleFS
govctl-orggovctl-org/govctl/.claude/skills/spec/SKILL.md

spec

Skill276 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub

Maintain RFC and ADR artifacts without implementation work

168 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use backprop, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JuliusBrusseeSkill

    backprop

    Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • bastosSkill

    ios-design-review

    Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Saqlain-811

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 145 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read artifacts with show; add --history only when obsolete content matters.

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Use govctl <resource> --help for current syntax.

    line 23
  3. Very specific:

    Do not write code, create Work Items, or advance an RFC beyond spec.

    line 27
  4. Very specific:

    Do not edit gov/ files directly.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask the user before any lifecycle or destructive artifact operation (accept, reject, finalize, advance, bump, deprecate, supersede, delete) …

    line 32
  6. Distinctive:

    Stop a lifecycle mutation when you cannot establish the phase, sealed baseline, or recovery path it depends on.

    line 35
  7. Very specific:

    Follow rfc-writer or adr-writer.

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Read the RFC's phase and the rules in [[RFC-0000:C-PHASE-LIFECYCLE]] and [[RFC-0002:C-LIFECYCLE-VERBS]] before editing:

    line 56
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not edit or bump deprecated RFCs.

    line 66
  10. Distinctive:

    Leave unapproved artifacts in their current draft or proposed state.

    line 80

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 145 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Specification Maintenance

Maintain governance artifacts for $ARGUMENTS without writing code or creating execution work.

Discovery

govctl status
govctl search <topic>
govctl rfc list
govctl adr list

Read artifacts with show; add --history only when obsolete content matters. Use govctl <resource> --help for current syntax.

Hard Stops

  • Do not write code, create Work Items, or advance an RFC beyond spec.
  • RFCs own obligations, ADRs own design rationale, and Work Items own execution scope. Keep implementation plans out of RFCs and ADRs.
  • Do not edit gov/ files directly; use govctl commands. Clause operations use the root govctl clause namespace.
  • Ask the user before any lifecycle or destructive artifact operation (accept, reject, finalize, advance, bump, deprecate, supersede, delete) unless the request already authorizes it.
  • Stop a lifecycle mutation when you cannot establish the phase, sealed baseline, or recovery path it depends on.
  • Hand off to discuss or gov when a "clarification" changes behavior, the design is unresolved, or code is required.

Classify The Change

ChangePath
Clarify an obligation, behavior unchangedEdit and review the RFC
Add, change, deprecate, or remove behaviorAmend the RFC, then hand code to gov
Refine rationale or alternativesEdit and review the ADR
Open design questionHand off to discuss
Metadata or reference fixEdit the owning artifact

Follow rfc-writer or adr-writer. Before a lifecycle transition on substantively changed content, run rfc-reviewer, adr-reviewer, or wi-reviewer as appropriate.

RFC Lifecycle

Read the RFC's phase and the rules in [[RFC-0000:C-PHASE-LIFECYCLE]] and [[RFC-0002:C-LIFECYCLE-VERBS]] before editing:

  • A draft RFC is finalized, never bumped.
  • A normative RFC in spec is still its open candidate; do not bump it just to retarget that candidate.
  • Content edits after spec need an authorized version bump before further phase progression.
  • A post-spec RFC with no trustworthy sealed baseline needs migration or a restore from version control, not an inferred bump.
  • Do not edit or bump deprecated RFCs.
  • Clause since is lifecycle-owned; use Clause lifecycle commands. Current-version changelog corrections use the changelog edit path and do not replace an amendment or bump.

Done When

  • each artifact stays within its authority and its lifecycle state is explicit;
  • its reviewer has no unresolved critical finding;
  • govctl check passes and affected projections are rendered; and
  • the final response names changed artifacts, lifecycle state, review result, and the next workflow: discuss for open design, gov for code, quick for unrelated non-behavioral cleanup, or commit for VCS.

Leave unapproved artifacts in their current draft or proposed state.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.