report-feedback
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Submit free-form feedback or issue reports from the current agent session to Passport. Proactively invoke when the user says "report this", "file a bug", "send feedback", "log this issue", or describes a failure worth surfacing. Also invoke at the end of a multi-step task to capture successes or surprises that future debugging would benefit from.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sergeiwallace/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- CheehooLabs/SpureeSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Azure/azure-sdk-toolstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sonichi/sutandotheir own version, first seen May 17, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- sonichi/sutando★ 396same name
- Azure/azure-sdk-tools★ 134same name
- CheehooLabs/SpureeSkills★ 18same name
- sergeiwallace/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- activitySkill
- attach-sessionSkill
- authenticate-userSkill
- defi-auto-repaySkill
- defi-swapSkill
- form-session-delegationSkill
- kite-discoverySkill
- kite-passportSkill
- manage-agentsSkill
- passport-overviewSkill
- Passport SetupSkill
- request-sessionSkill
- shoppingSkill
- upgrade-passportSkill
- wallet-sendSkill
- x402-executeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Prerequisite: Before using any Passport skill, check if kpass is installed by running command -v kpass.
- Distinctive: line 103
State what you verified: If you could not check on-chain, say "not verified on-chain" rather than asserting a ledger mismatch.
- Distinctive: line 113
Never auto-file feedback without the user being aware.
- Distinctive: line 132
Ask: "Send this feedback?" Wait for an explicit affirmative.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Report Feedback
Prerequisite: Before using any Passport skill, check if kpass is installed by running command -v kpass. If it returns nothing, invoke the passport-setup skill first to install the CLI.
Submit free-form textual feedback or issue reports from the current Claude agent session to the Passport backend. Useful for filing bugs, capturing failures, recording successes, or attaching session context that humans on the Passport team can review later.
Feedback is written under the agent's owner (the authenticated user) using the agent's JWT. Each submission stores a body (up to 1 MiB), an optional category, an optional session ID, and a JSON metadata object queryable in Postgres.
Reference files (read when you need exact detail):
@references/commands.md— full command reference, argument table, error handling.@references/examples.md— worked example.
When to Use This Skill
- The user says "report this", "file a bug", "send feedback", "let the team know", "log this issue", or any phrasing that explicitly asks to surface something to Passport.
- The agent hits an unrecoverable failure during a multi-step task (e.g., checkout failed three times in a row, an API returned an unexpected schema, a tool emitted an exit code with no clear recovery) and capturing context would help the team.
- The user wraps up a complex session and wants to leave a note (positive or negative) — e.g., "before we wrap, file a quick note that the new search results were way better."
- The user reports something confusing or unexpected about the product behavior that the team should know about.
When NOT to Use This Skill
- The user is asking a navigation or how-to question — answer it directly; don't file feedback about it.
- The user is mid-task and just wants help — finish helping first; offer to file feedback only if the situation warrants it.
- There's no concrete observation, error, or intent to file. Don't invent feedback to seem helpful.
- The user is asking to read prior feedback or activity — use the
activityskill instead (and note that feedback rows are not yet surfaced in the activity feed; that's a future feature). - Payments, wallet ops, shopping checkout — use the dedicated skills (
x402-execute,wallet-send,shopping).
Prerequisites
- User authenticated — if not (exit code 3 with "Not logged in"), use the
authenticate-userskill first. - Agent registered — if the agent's local config is missing (
Agent not registeredon exit code 3), run:kpass agent:register --type <agent-type> --output json # Replace <agent-type> with your agent's identity: claude, cursor, codex, cline, etc. - No spending session required — feedback is a free agent-JWT call.
Defaults (Do Not Ask the User Unless They Specify Otherwise)
| Setting | Default value | Override |
| Output format | --output json | Always use JSON output. Never omit this flag. |
| Category | Pick one from the suggested list (see below) | Override only if the user names a specific category. |
| Session ID | Omit (most calls do not have one in scope) | Pass --session-id only when a session is genuinely relevant. |
| Metadata | Always include at least {"model": "<your-model-id>"} | Add more keys when relevant. Keep it a flat JSON object. |
| Base URL | Omit (uses built-in default) | Only pass --base-url if the user explicitly provides a custom backend URL. |
What to Capture (Checklist Before Running the Command)
Walk through this before invoking:
- Content (
--content, required): a clear summary of what happened. Include:- What the user was trying to do
- What went wrong (if a failure), or what was notable (if positive feedback)
- Key error messages or exit codes verbatim, if any
- A short reproduction recipe if relevant
Aim for a few sentences to a few paragraphs. If you have a very long transcript (>4 KB), write it to a temp file and use
--content-file.
Category (
--category, optional but recommended): pick the closest match:Category Use for bugReproducible incorrect behavior incidentOne-off failure or outage with unclear cause successNotable positive outcome worth recording feature_requestUser wants a capability that doesn't exist confusedBehavior was unexpected or unclear, but not necessarily broken - Session ID (
--session-id, optional): pass if a spending session was active when the issue happened and is relevant context. - Metadata (
--metadata, optional but encouraged): a flat JSON object. At minimum include the model identifier. Add fields that help diagnose:
Keys are free-form; future queries ({ "model": "claude-opus-4-7", "tool_call_count": 17, "last_exit_code": 5, "command": "kpass shop:checkout" }metadata_json->>'model') decide what's useful.
Verify Before Filing Payment / Settlement / Ledger Bugs
Claims that a payment "didn't settle", "was charged but the money never moved", "double-charged", or that the ledger/balance disagrees with the chain are high-severity and frequently turn out to be false alarms. Before filing one, verify on-chain — do NOT file off a wallet balance reading alone:
- Capture the settlement reference. Pull the EVM
transaction_hashor Solana signature from the execute response (payment.payment_response.reference/payment_receipt) or theactivityrecord, and confirm it on-chain. Include that reference in the feedback. - Re-read
wallet balance— it reads fresh by default. The command forces a fresh read (bypassing the backend's 30s cache) unless you pass--cachedor run a very old client, so a re-read after a payment reflects the on-chain debit. An unchanged balance is far more likely a cached read or the wrong wallet than a missing debit — confirm you're looking at the wallet that actually paid (agent-session execute pays from the session/agent wallet). The on-chain settlement reference (step 1) remains the strongest evidence. - State what you verified. If you could not check on-chain, say "not verified on-chain" rather than asserting a ledger mismatch.
A settlement-integrity report without an on-chain reference is almost always a cache / wrong-wallet / wrong-method confound — capturing the reference up front saves a costly investigation.
Confirmation Gate
Show the user a pre-submit display card and wait for explicit confirmation before running the command.
Exception: if the user originated the request (e.g., "file a bug about this"), confirmation is implicit — you may submit directly, but still show the pre-submit card so they know what's being sent.
Never auto-file feedback without the user being aware.
Display Cards (MANDATORY)
Pre-submit Preview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Feedback to submit
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Category: {category or "(none)"}
Session: {session_id or "(none)"}
Metadata: {comma-separated keys from --metadata}
Content:
{first ~200 chars of --content, then "...(truncated)" if longer}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Ask: "Send this feedback?" Wait for an explicit affirmative.
Post-submit Confirmation
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Feedback submitted
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
ID: {feedback_id}
Created: {created_at}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━See @references/commands.md for the full agent:feedback submit argument table, every JSON output shape (success and error), and the input validation checklist. See @references/examples.md for a worked end-to-end example (filing a bug from a failed checkout).
Error Handling
| Exit code | Meaning | Recovery |
| 0 | Success | Show post-submit card |
| 1 | Network / server error / oversized content | Do NOT auto-retry — submission is not idempotent, so a lost response doesn't tell you whether the row was already written. Surface the error and offer to save locally; only resubmit if the user explicitly asks (see @references/commands.md). |
| 2 | Usage error (missing/invalid flag) | Fix the flag and re-run |
| 3 | Auth error (agent not registered or token expired) | Run kpass agent:register --type <agent-type> --output json; if still failing, use authenticate-user skill |
| 4 | Not found | Should not happen for this command; surface error to user |
See @references/commands.md for the exact error envelope of every state.
Cross-Skill References
- Prerequisites:
authenticate-user— the user must be logged in. - Related:
activity— view recent account activity. Note: feedback rows are stored in a separate table and are not currently surfaced in the activity feed.manage-agents— inspect the agent's owner/session if the user asks "who is this filed under?"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

