agentleFS
gohypergiantgohypergiant/agent-skills/skills/accelint-skill-manager/references/skill.md

references

Skill25 starsChanged 54 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

General rule of thumb is to follow guidance from Agent Skills. Since the overview and references table of contents is contained in the AGENTS.md file the content for this AGENTS.md file should be optimized towards adding any additional context, hints, or suggestions that help an agent more accurately determine if this skill is relevant. The persona and target audience for this document is an AI Agent or LLM. Do not link to other skills' files directly. Use skill name references…

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 12

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not link to other skills' files directly.

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    Format: Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), the agent …

    line 21
  4. Distinctive:

    Use concrete triggers, symptoms, and situations that signal this skill applies

    line 46
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep triggers technology-agnostic unless the skill itself is technology-specific

    line 48
  6. Distinctive:

    If skill is technology-specific, make that explicit in the trigger

    line 49
  7. Distinctive:

    Write in third person (injected into system prompt)

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Use words an agent would search for:

    line 80
  9. Distinctive:

    Use skill name only, with explicit requirement markers:

    line 90
  10. Distinctive:

    Match: Must exactly match directory name

    line 118
  11. Distinctive:

    Version Consistency: Must match the latest version in CHANGELOG.md

    line 141
  12. Distinctive:

    Consistency: Use the same author identifier across all skills from your organization

    line 173
  13. Very specific:

    Only include compatibility when the skill has hard dependencies.

    line 184

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

1.2 SKILL.md

Overview

General rule of thumb is to follow guidance from Agent Skills. Since the overview and references table of contents is contained in the AGENTS.md file the content for this AGENTS.md file should be optimized towards adding any additional context, hints, or suggestions that help an agent more accurately determine if this skill is relevant. The persona and target audience for this document is an AI Agent or LLM.

Do not link to other skills' files directly. Use skill name references instead.

Rich Description Field

Purpose: Some agents like Claude read the description field to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"

Format: Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions

CRITICAL: Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does

The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions. Do NOT summarize the skill's process or workflow in the description.

Why this matters: Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, an agent may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused an agent to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).

When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), the agent correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.

The trap: Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut an agent will take. The skill body becomes documentation that an agent skips.

❌ Incorrect: summarizes workflow - agent may follow this instead of reading skill

description: Use when executing plans - dispatches subagent per task with code review between tasks

❌ Incorrect: too much process detail

description: Use for TDD - write test first, watch it fail, write minimal code, refactor

✅ Correct: just triggering conditions, no workflow summary

description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

✅ Correct: triggering conditions only

description: Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Content:

  • Use concrete triggers, symptoms, and situations that signal this skill applies
  • Describe the problem (race conditions, inconsistent behavior) not language-specific symptoms (setTimeout, sleep)
  • Keep triggers technology-agnostic unless the skill itself is technology-specific
  • If skill is technology-specific, make that explicit in the trigger
  • Write in third person (injected into system prompt)
  • NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow

❌ Incorrect: too abstract, vague, doesn't include when to use

description: For async testing

❌ Incorrect: first person

description: I can help you with async tests when they're flaky

❌ Incorrect: mentions technology but skill isn't specific to it

description: Use when tests use setTimeout/sleep and are flaky

✅ Correct: Starts with "Use when", describes problem, no workflow

description: Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or pass/fail inconsistently

✅ Correct: technology-specific skill with explicit trigger

description: Use when using Next.js and handling authentication redirects

Keyword Coverage

Use words an agent would search for:

  • Error messages: "Hook timed out", "ENOTEMPTY", "race condition"
  • Symptoms: "flaky", "hanging", "zombie", "pollution"
  • Synonyms: "timeout/hang/freeze", "cleanup/teardown/afterEach"
  • Tools: Actual commands, library names, file types

Cross-Referencing Other Skills

When writing documentation that references other skills:

Use skill name only, with explicit requirement markers:

  • ✅ Correct: **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use ts-best-practices
  • ✅ Correct: **REQUIRED BACKGROUND:** You MUST understand vitest-best-practices
  • ❌ Incorrect: See skills/vitest-best-practices (unclear if required)
  • ❌ Incorrect: @skills/react-best-practices/SKILL.md (force-loads, burns context)

Why no @ links: @ syntax force-loads files immediately, consuming context before you need them.


Frontmatter Metadata

Required Fields

---
name: skill-name          # lowercase + hyphens only, ≤64 chars
description: "..."        # Triggering conditions (1-1024 chars)
license: Apache-2.0       # License identifier
metadata:
  author: "accelint"      # Author/organization
  version: "1.0"          # Semantic version
---

name Field Rules

  • Format: lowercase + hyphens only (no underscores, no consecutive hyphens)
  • Length: ≤64 chars to prevent UI truncation
  • Match: Must exactly match directory name
    • Mismatch causes load failures (skill system uses directory name as canonical identifier)

Examples:

  • ✅ Correct: react-best-practices, pdf-editor, big-query-helper
  • ❌ Incorrect: React_Best_Practices (mixed case, underscores), pdf--editor (consecutive hyphens)

description Field

See "Rich Description Field" section above for comprehensive guidance.

metadata.version Field

Purpose: Track skill evolution and ensure CHANGELOG consistency

Format: Semantic versioning "X.Y" or "X.Y.Z"

  • Major.Minor format: "1.0", "2.3"
  • Major.Minor.Patch format: "1.0.1", "2.3.4"

Versioning Guidelines:

  • Major (1.0 → 2.0): Substantial rewrites, breaking changes, complete restructuring
  • Minor (1.0 → 1.1): New sections, significant additions, refinements
  • Patch (1.0.0 → 1.0.1): Bug fixes, typo corrections, minor clarifications

Version Consistency: Must match the latest version in CHANGELOG.md

Examples:

# After major restructure
metadata:
  version: "2.0"  # was 1.4, now complete rewrite
# After adding new section
metadata:
  version: "1.3"  # was 1.2, added new anti-patterns section
# After bug fix
metadata:
  version: "1.2.1"  # was 1.2.0, fixed broken links

metadata.author Field

Purpose: Identify skill creator/maintainer organization

Format: Lowercase organization name or author identifier

Examples:

  • "accelint" - Organization name
  • "anthropic" - Company name
  • "username" - Individual author

Consistency: Use the same author identifier across all skills from your organization

Optional Fields

compatibility:
  tools: ["grep", "sed"]           # Required CLI tools
  skills: ["other-skill-name"]     # Required prerequisite skills
  platforms: ["linux", "darwin"]   # Supported platforms

Only include compatibility when the skill has hard dependencies. Most skills don't need this.


Reference: https://agentskills.io/specification#skill-md-format

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.