agentleFS
gocronx-teamgocronx-team/gocron/.agents/skills/security-check/SKILL.md

security-check

Skill808 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit or harden gocron security across Go, pnpm workspaces, containers, authentication, authorization, secrets, command execution, SSRF, and dependency vulnerabilities. Use for security reviews, vulnerability remediation, Dependabot security alerts, release hardening, or suspected exposure.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default to read-only review.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Run from the repository root:

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    Never dismiss or ignore an alert solely because tests pass.

    line 64

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Check gocron security

Default to read-only review. A request to scan or report does not authorize dependency upgrades, source changes, alert dismissal, PR merges, or pushes.

Establish scope and trust boundaries

Inspect the diff when reviewing a change; inspect the relevant data flow when reviewing the repository. Prioritize internet-facing routes, API and agent tokens, password/2FA flows, command execution, host/URL inputs, uploaded/imported data, secret storage, logs, webhooks, AI provider calls, and RPC boundaries.

Check for:

  • missing authentication, authorization, ownership checks, or audit events;
  • SQL/command/template/path injection and unsafe shell construction;
  • SSRF, unrestricted redirects, unsafe downloads, and weak URL validation;
  • plaintext secrets, accidental logging, overly broad tokens, weak signing, insecure randomness, and missing expiry/rotation;
  • mass assignment, unbounded input/body/queue sizes, brute force, and DoS;
  • unsafe CORS/cookies/headers and frontend token exposure;
  • vulnerable direct and transitive dependencies and unsafe container defaults.

Trace sanitizers and middleware to their implementation; do not infer safety from function names. Do not print secret values while investigating.

Run deterministic gates

Run from the repository root:

bash .agents/skills/security-check/scripts/security_gate.sh

The script runs independent checks and continues after failures. Missing tools or network access are SKIP, never PASS. Review git changes afterward because security tools must not silently alter lockfiles.

The default secret scan checks the current working tree. For the slower full-history scan, run:

GOCRON_SECURITY_SCAN_HISTORY=1 bash .agents/skills/security-check/scripts/security_gate.sh

For authorization or input-validation changes, add focused negative tests and run the affected package with -race. Invoke $verify after fixes.

Triage and report

For each finding, provide severity, reachable attack path, affected file:line, evidence, impact, and smallest safe remediation. Distinguish:

  • confirmed exploitable behavior;
  • defense-in-depth improvement;
  • dependency advisory not reachable in this application;
  • false positive with concrete justification.

Never dismiss or ignore an alert solely because tests pass. Do not claim the repository is secure; state the scope covered and skipped checks.

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions28 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 28

    1. alibaba/loongcollector★ 2.2ksame name
    2. TermiX-official/cryptoclaw★ 100same name
    3. igmarin/rails-agent-skills★ 26same name
    4. aws-samples/sample-agentic-coding-harness-benchmarks★ 20same name
    5. Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp★ 17same name
    6. YehudaFrankel/clankbrain★ 16same name
    7. DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-website★ 15same name
    8. Nirusan/claude-config★ 7same name
    9. brunobracaioli/business_dossie★ 4same name
    10. Ahlut/batuta★ 2same name

    18 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use learn and code-review.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • genomewalkerSkill

      learn

      Learn from web sources, generate SKILL.md, and store key patterns in soul memory. Trigger keywords: learn, skill-gen, web-learn, documentation, tutorial.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • GoogleSkill

      code-review

      Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

      Also in 5 projects that use this

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.