build-iphone-apps
Skill2k starsChanged 12 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build professional native iPhone apps in Swift with SwiftUI and UIKit. Full lifecycle - build, debug, test, optimize, ship. CLI-only, no Xcode. Targets iOS 26 with iOS 18 compatibility.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Quiet this year.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- mosif16/codex-Skillsword for word, first seen Nov 24, 2025
- glittercowboy/taches-cc-resourcesword for word, first seen Nov 23, 2025
Who's talking about glittercowboy/taches-cc-prompts
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- glittercowboy/taches-cc-resources★ 2k100% same
- mosif16/codex-Skills★ 18100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- create-agent-skillsSkill
- create-hooksSkill
- create-mcp-serversSkill
- create-meta-promptsSkill
- create-plansSkill
- create-slash-commandsSkill
- create-subagentsSkill
- debug-like-expertSkill
- build-macos-appsSkill
- setup-ralphSkill
- the-pirate-baySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Never say "this should work." Prove it:
- Distinctive: line 21
If you didn't run it, you don't know it works.
- Distinctive: line 48
Never batch up work. Never say "I made several changes." Each change is verified before the next.
- Distinctive: line 62
Every stopping point = working state.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<essential_principles>
How We Work
The user is the product owner. Claude is the developer.
The user does not write code. The user does not read code. The user describes what they want and judges whether the result is acceptable. Claude implements, verifies, and reports outcomes.
1. Prove, Don't Promise
Never say "this should work." Prove it:
xcodebuild -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift
xcodebuild test -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16'
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" && xcrun simctl launch booted com.app.bundleIf you didn't run it, you don't know it works.
2. Tests for Correctness, Eyes for Quality
| Question | How to Answer |
| Does the logic work? | Write test, see it pass |
| Does it look right? | Launch in simulator, user looks at it |
| Does it feel right? | User uses it |
| Does it crash? | Test + launch |
| Is it fast enough? | Profiler |
Tests verify correctness. The user verifies desirability.
3. Report Outcomes, Not Code
Bad: "I refactored DataService to use async/await with weak self capture"
Good: "Fixed the memory leak. leaks now shows 0 leaks. App tested stable for 5 minutes."
The user doesn't care what you changed. The user cares what's different.
4. Small Steps, Always Verified
Change → Verify → Report → Next changeNever batch up work. Never say "I made several changes." Each change is verified before the next. If something breaks, you know exactly what caused it.
5. Ask Before, Not After
Unclear requirement? Ask now. Multiple valid approaches? Ask which. Scope creep? Ask if wanted. Big refactor needed? Ask permission.
Wrong: Build for 30 minutes, then "is this what you wanted?" Right: "Before I start, does X mean Y or Z?"
6. Always Leave It Working
Every stopping point = working state. Tests pass, app launches, changes committed. The user can walk away anytime and come back to something that works. </essential_principles>
<intake>
**Ask the user:**What would you like to do?
- Build a new app
- Debug an existing app
- Add a feature
- Write/run tests
- Optimize performance
- Ship/release
- Something else
Then read the matching workflow from workflows/ and follow it.
</intake>
<routing>
| Response | Workflow |
|----------|----------|
| 1, "new", "create", "build", "start" | `workflows/build-new-app.md` |
| 2, "broken", "fix", "debug", "crash", "bug" | `workflows/debug-app.md` |
| 3, "add", "feature", "implement", "change" | `workflows/add-feature.md` |
| 4, "test", "tests", "TDD", "coverage" | `workflows/write-tests.md` |
| 5, "slow", "optimize", "performance", "fast" | `workflows/optimize-performance.md` |
| 6, "ship", "release", "TestFlight", "App Store" | `workflows/ship-app.md` |
| 7, other | Clarify, then select workflow or references |
</routing><verification_loop>
After Every Change
# 1. Does it build?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift
# 2. Do tests pass?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' test
# 3. Does it launch? (if UI changed)
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" 2>/dev/null || true
xcrun simctl install booted ./build/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/AppName.app
xcrun simctl launch booted com.company.AppNameReport to the user:
- "Build: ✓"
- "Tests: 12 pass, 0 fail"
- "App launches in simulator, ready for you to check [specific thing]" </verification_loop>
<when_to_test>
Testing Decision
Write a test when:
- Logic that must be correct (calculations, transformations, rules)
- State changes (add, delete, update operations)
- Edge cases that could break (nil, empty, boundaries)
- Bug fix (test reproduces bug, then proves it's fixed)
- Refactoring (tests prove behavior unchanged)
Skip tests when:
- Pure UI exploration ("make it blue and see if I like it")
- Rapid prototyping ("just get something on screen")
- Subjective quality ("does this feel right?")
- One-off verification (launch and check manually)
The principle: Tests let the user verify correctness without reading code. If the user needs to verify it works, and it's not purely visual, write a test. </when_to_test>
<reference_index>
Domain Knowledge
All in references/:
Architecture: app-architecture, swiftui-patterns, navigation-patterns Data: data-persistence, networking Platform Features: push-notifications, storekit, background-tasks Quality: polish-and-ux, accessibility, performance Assets & Security: app-icons, security, app-store Development: project-scaffolding, cli-workflow, cli-observability, testing, ci-cd </reference_index>
<workflows_index>
Workflows
All in workflows/:
| File | Purpose |
| build-new-app.md | Create new iOS app from scratch |
| debug-app.md | Find and fix bugs |
| add-feature.md | Add to existing app |
| write-tests.md | Write and run tests |
| optimize-performance.md | Profile and speed up |
| ship-app.md | TestFlight, App Store submission |
| </workflows_index> |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

