decision-toolkit
Skill404 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate structured decision-making tools — step-by-step guides, bias checkers, scenario explorers, and interactive dashboards. Use when facing significant choices requiring systematic analysis. Supports multiple cognitive styles and output formats.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 10
Create structured decision support materials that help humans think through significant choices systematically.
- Very specific: line 216
Use templates in templates/ directory:
- Common: line 233
If using Agency brand:
- Common: line 234
Import brand-agency skill CSS variables
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision Toolkit
Overview
Create structured decision support materials that help humans think through significant choices systematically. This skill produces interactive tools, not just analysis — empowering the decision-maker rather than deciding for them.
Philosophy
Principles
- Guide, don't decide — Tools illuminate the decision space; humans choose
- One thing at a time — Reduce cognitive load through progressive disclosure
- Multiple lenses — Same decision viewed through different frameworks reveals blind spots
- Biases visible — Make cognitive biases explicit and checkable
- Actionable output — End with concrete next steps, not abstract conclusions
Accessibility First
- Support screen readers (semantic HTML, ARIA labels)
- Keyboard navigable (tab order, focus states)
- High contrast by default (WCAG AA minimum)
- Reduced motion option
- Works without JavaScript (graceful degradation)
- Mobile-friendly touch targets (44px minimum)
Cognitive Inclusivity
Different people process decisions differently:
| Style | Accommodation |
| Analytical | Numbers, matrices, weighted scores |
| Intuitive | Gut-check prompts, "how does this feel?" |
| Visual | Diagrams, progress bars, color coding |
| Verbal | Written summaries, question prompts |
| Sequential | Step-by-step wizard flow |
| Global | Dashboard overview option |
When to Use
Invoke this skill when user faces:
- Collaboration/partnership decisions
- Career or job changes
- Investment of significant time/money
- Project prioritization
- Technology/tool selection
- Any choice with multiple factors and uncertainty
Not for: Trivial decisions, emergency responses, or when user just needs information.
Decision Types
Type 1: Opportunity Evaluation
Should I pursue this opportunity?
- Partnership, job offer, investment, project
Type 2: Resource Allocation
Where should I invest my time/money/attention?
- Prioritization, budgeting, focus areas
Type 3: Risk Assessment
What could go wrong and is it worth it?
- New ventures, changes, experiments
Type 4: Trade-off Navigation
Which option among alternatives?
- Tool selection, hire decisions, strategic choices
The Decision Journey
Nine steps, each focused on one dimension:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. CONTEXT What is the decision? │
│ 2. FIRST PRINCIPLES Does this solve a real problem? │
│ 3. TIMING Is now the right moment? │
│ 4. STAKEHOLDERS Who else is involved? Are they stable? │
│ 5. BIASES What might cloud my judgment? │
│ 6. OPPORTUNITY COST What am I giving up? │
│ 7. SCENARIOS What could happen? │
│ 8. QUESTIONS What do I still need to learn? │
│ 9. SYNTHESIS Summary + decision │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Output Formats
1. Interactive HTML Guide (Primary)
Step-by-step wizard with:
- Progress indicator
- One question per screen
- State persistence across steps
- Final summary aggregating all inputs
- Keyboard navigation
- Print-friendly CSS
2. Markdown Framework
For offline/text-based use:
- Structured prompts
- Checkbox-style bias audit
- Fill-in-the-blank templates
3. Voice Summary
For audio consumption:
- 5-7 paragraph executive summary
- Orpheus TTS markup for emotional texture
- Key decision + rationale
4. PDF Report
For documentation/sharing:
- Professional formatting
- All frameworks applied
- Appendix with raw analysis
Frameworks Reference
First Principles Test
1. What problem does this solve?
2. Can I solve it myself?
3. Is this the best solution?
4. What assumptions am I making?
5. If starting fresh today, would I choose this?Bias Checklist
□ FOMO — Am I afraid of missing out?
□ Sunk Cost — Am I factoring past investment?
□ Authority — Am I deferring to credentials?
□ Social Proof — Am I following the crowd?
□ Commitment — Do I feel locked in by past statements?
□ Optimism — Am I assuming problems will resolve?
□ Recency — Am I overweighting recent events?
□ Confirmation — Am I seeking validating info only?
□ Shiny Object — Is novelty distracting me?
□ Loss Aversion — Am I overweighting potential losses?Opportunity Cost Calculator
Hours/week × Weeks × Hourly rate = Direct cost
+ What else could those hours produce?
+ What relationships/opportunities might suffer?
= True opportunity costScenario Matrix
| Scenario | Probability | Outcome | Expected Value |
|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| Worst | X% | ... | ... |
| Bad | X% | ... | ... |
| Neutral | X% | ... | ... |
| Good | X% | ... | ... |
| Best | X% | ... | ... |Pre-mortem
Imagine it's [future date]. This decision failed. Why?
Possible causes:
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
Which causes are within my control?
Which warning signs should I watch for?10-10-10 Framework
How will I feel about this decision in:
- 10 minutes?
- 10 months?
- 10 years?Regret Minimization
Imagine you're 80 looking back.
Would you regret doing this?
Would you regret NOT doing this?Implementation Guide
Step 1: Gather Context
Ask user for:
- What is the decision?
- What are the options?
- What's the timeline?
- What's at stake?
- Any relevant background?
Or extract from existing documents (meeting transcripts, notes).
Step 2: Choose Output Format
Based on user preference and context:
- Complex decision + time available → Interactive HTML
- Quick analysis → Markdown framework
- On-the-go consumption → Voice summary
- Need to share with others → PDF report
Step 3: Generate Tool
Use templates in templates/ directory:
decision-guide-template.html— Full interactive wizarddecision-framework.md— Text-based analysisdecision-voice-summary.md— Audio script template
Step 4: Customize
Replace placeholders:
{{DECISION_TITLE}}— What's being decided{{CONTEXT}}— Background information{{OPTIONS}}— Available choices{{STAKEHOLDERS}}— People/teams involved{{TIMELINE}}— Relevant dates{{FACTORS}}— Key evaluation criteria
Step 5: Apply Branding (Optional)
If using Agency brand:
- Import brand-agency skill CSS variables
- Use neobrutalism styling
- Apply Geist/EB Garamond typography
Accessibility Implementation
Semantic HTML
<main role="main" aria-label="Decision Guide">
<nav aria-label="Progress">
<ol role="list">...</ol>
</nav>
<section aria-labelledby="step-title">
<h1 id="step-title">...</h1>
</section>
</main>Keyboard Navigation
// Ensure all interactive elements are focusable
// Tab order follows visual order
// Enter/Space activate buttons
// Arrow keys navigate optionsScreen Reader Announcements
<div role="status" aria-live="polite" id="announcer">
<!-- Announce step changes, selections, results -->
</div>Color Contrast
/* Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text */
--text-on-light: #000000; /* 21:1 on white */
--text-on-dark: #ffffff; /* 21:1 on black */
--text-on-primary: #ffffff; /* Check each color */Reduced Motion
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
* {
animation: none !important;
transition: none !important;
}
}Cultural Considerations
Individualist Framing
- "What do YOU want?"
- Personal goals and values
- Individual opportunity cost
Collectivist Framing
- "How does this affect your team/family?"
- Relationship implications
- Group harmony considerations
Power Distance Awareness
- Some cultures defer to authority figures
- Bias check should include "Am I deferring inappropriately?"
- Include stakeholder perspectives explicitly
Uncertainty Tolerance
- Some prefer detailed scenario analysis
- Others find it anxiety-inducing
- Offer both detailed and simplified views
Example Invocations
From Meeting Transcript
User: Analyze this meeting transcript and create a decision toolkit
Claude: [Extracts decision, stakeholders, options from transcript]
[Generates interactive HTML guide]
[Creates voice summary]From Scratch
User: I need to decide whether to take a new job offer
Claude: [Asks clarifying questions]
[Generates decision framework]
[Customizes for career decision type]Quick Analysis
User: Help me think through this partnership decision, just give me the frameworks
Claude: [Provides markdown framework]
[Skips interactive tool]
[Focuses on key questions]Files
SKILL.md— This filetemplates/decision-guide-template.html— Interactive wizard templatetemplates/decision-framework.md— Text-based analysis templatetemplates/decision-voice-summary.md— Audio script templatereferences/bias-encyclopedia.md— Detailed bias descriptionsreferences/framework-deep-dives.md— Extended framework explanations
Integration
Works well with:
- brand-agency — Apply visual branding
- transcript-analyzer — Extract decisions from meetings
- pdf-generation — Create shareable reports
- elevenlabs-tts — Generate audio summaries
Learnings
2026-01-09
Context: Initial skill creation from Synthius decision session
Key Insight: Dashboard-everything-at-once overwhelms. Step-by-step wizard with one concept per screen dramatically improves usability.
Architecture: 9-step journey covering all major decision dimensions. State object persists selections across steps. Summary aggregates everything.
Accessibility Note: High contrast neobrutalism actually helps accessibility — clear borders, distinct states, no subtle gradients.
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- JAVICHILEON/claude---Skills★ 0100% same
- KISHOR403/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 2
- arielnishri-svg/claude-skills★ 199% same
- yannick-bottino/consulting-claude-skills★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- DjordjeMojsilovic/Djordjes-Claude-Setup★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository110 other files it gives its agents.
- automation-advisor/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agency-docs-updaterSkill
- agency-meetup-publishSkill
- agency-socialsSkill
- agent-cliSkill
- agent-roundtableSkill
- app-releaseSkill
- automation-advisorSkill
- background-agentsSkill
- balancedSkill
- brand-agencySkill
- browser-mateSkill
- browsing-historySkill
- chrome-historySkill
- cms-migration-checklistSkill
- coaching-session-summarizerSkill
- codexSkill
- cognitive-toolkitSkill
- context-builderSkill
- cull-release-checkSkill
- cull-release-prepareSkill
- cull-release-publishSkill
- cull-release-recoverSkill
- cull-releaseSkill
- cull-release-verifySkill
- cullSkill
- daydreamSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- design-tokensSkill
- doctorgSkill
- ecosystemSkill
- elevenlabs-ttsSkill
- elimination-researchSkill
- fathomSkill
- feature-factorySkill
- firecrawl-apiSkill
- firecrawl-researchSkill
- font-featuresSkill
- github-gistSkill
- gmailSkill
- google-image-searchSkill
- gpt-image-2Skill
- granolaSkill
- gwsSkill
- health-dataSkill
- i18n-studioSkill
- init-tauri-appSkill
- init-xcode-appSkill
- insight-extractorSkill
- jtbdSkill
- lab-retroSkill
- learning-vaultSkill
- linearSkill
- llm-cliSkill
- local-modelsSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- meeting-processorSkill
- metaSkill
- name-auditionSkill
- nano-bananaSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

