agentleFS
GitHubKnown publishergithub/plugin-marketplace-starter/plugins/customization-authoring/skills/skill-authoring/SKILL.md

skill-authoring

Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create or improve an agent skill with clear triggers, bounded instructions, and positive and negative Vally evals. Use for requests to author a reusable SKILL.md and its evaluations. Don't use for ordinary coding, factual questions, or simply running an existing skill.

89 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use cloud-api-recipe-authoring, codebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TencentCloudBaseSkill

    cloud-api-recipe-authoring

    Author or revise a cloud-api-operations recipe (config/source/skills/cloud-api-operations/references/recipes/). Encodes why the long tail of control-plane capabilities is deliberately NOT wrapped as MCP/CLI tools, the API-first admission test for whether a capability deserves a recipe, the negative and positive lists, the fixed recipe structure, the writing rules distilled from writing-for-agents, the user-facing copy red lines, and the product regeneration/verification pipeline. Also routes contributors (and their agents) to the contribution flow and the pre-PR self-test protocol in references/contributing.md. Use when adding a recipe, judging whether a scenario belongs in the recipe set, updating the recipes index, re-checking existing recipes against the admission test, or onboarding someone who wants to submit one.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TencentCloudBaseSkill

    codebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade

    升级 CodeBuddy IDE(genie 扩展)内置的 CloudBase MCP,以及 MCP 发版时同步 IDE 侧白名单。当用户提到「更新 IDE 里的 MCP」「内置 MCP 版本太老」「IDE 集成的 CloudBase 功能不足」「改工具白名单 toolWhiteList」「把新 bundle 打进 CodeBuddy」「白名单漂移」「MCP 发版要同步什么」时使用。覆盖:解包定位内置 bundle 与内嵌配置、重新构建 mcp bundle、生成新的工具白名单与系统提示词、安全注入 IDE 并备份、用 MCP 协议验证工具清单、人工端到端验收、一键回滚。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • DIL8654Skill

    api-contract-review

    Review ASP.NET Core Web API contracts for HTTP semantics, versioning, backward compatibility, and response consistency. Use when the user asks to review an API, check endpoints, validate REST behavior, or before releasing contract changes.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • zaxbysauceSkill

    pr-review-fix

    Codex adapter for addressing pull request review feedback in opencode-swarm. Use when the user asks to fix PR review comments, requested changes, reviewer findings, CI-review notes, or a pasted review summary with low false-positive tolerance.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • albertdobmeyerSkill

    git-workflows

    Advanced git operations beyond add/commit/push. Use when rebasing, bisecting bugs, using worktrees for parallel development, recovering with reflog, managing subtrees/submodules, resolving merge conflicts, cherry-picking across branches, or working with monorepos.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • rogue-dev-studioSkill

    frontend-engineering

    Expert frontend application engineering: accessible UI structure, state and data-fetching discipline, form/validation UX, responsive layouts, performance budgets, and integration with API contracts. Use when building or refining SPA/web screens, design-system consumption, client-side routing, or fixing UI reliability (loading, empty, and error states).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +6 more from TencentCloudBase

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter containing a lowercase kebab-case name matching its directory and a specific description.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Write only the requested skill and eval artifacts.

    line 16

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Author a skill and its evals

Turn a concrete, repeatable task into a small skill whose behavior can be checked.

  1. Identify the task, inputs, expected output, trigger examples, non-trigger examples, and allowed side effects. Ask only for information that materially changes the result and isn't already supplied.
  2. Determine the active workspace root from the session's working directory or a working-directory query. Resolve the user's relative output paths against that root, not against this skill's directory. The directory containing this SKILL.md and its references is installation content, not the output workspace; don't create generated skills or evals under it unless the user explicitly asks to modify this skill. In a marketplace, put the new skill under the workflow plugin that owns it and keep evals outside that plugin. Don't create an unrelated agent, marketplace, or framework.
  3. Write SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter containing a lowercase kebab-case name matching its directory and a specific description. Explain when to use and not use it. Give executable instructions, input/error handling, and an observable outcome.
  4. Add a Vally eval using the authoring reference. Include a real task case with outcome graders and an unrelated request with a disallowed skill-invocation grader and an observable answer check. Tag each case with the assets it covers and its control, put one positive case in the smoke suite, and prefix stimulus names with the skill name. Resolve the skill path relative to the eval file.
  5. Verify the files exist at the requested workspace-relative paths, not just beneath the installed skill directory. Check their structure, real relative paths, and assertions that distinguish correct from incorrect behavior. Don't claim a behavioral pass unless the eval actually ran. Don't install dependencies or run paid evals unless requested.

Write only the requested skill and eval artifacts. Don't read credential files, modify existing work without approval, or embed tokens, private endpoints, expected answers, or this authoring skill's own evaluation data in the generated skill.

Finish with the created paths and the command to validate/run the eval. Distinguish static inspection from an executed behavioral result.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.