custom-engine-implementation
github/gh-aw/.github/skills/custom-engine-implementation/SKILL.md
Add and test declarative behavior-defined agentic engines in gh-aw, extending Go infrastructure only when necessary.
Skill5.2k starsChanged 4 months ago
--- name: custom-engine-implementation description: Add and test declarative behavior-defined agentic engines in gh-aw, extending Go infrastructure only when necessary. --- # Custom Engine Implementation Use this skill when adding a new agentic engine definition or extending the behavior-defined engine infrastructure. ## Choose the smallest implementation Prefer a shared Markdown engine definition. Installation, execution, MCP configuration, provider routing, caching, manifests, plugins, network defaults, harness scripts, and log parsing can already be declared through `engine.behaviors`. Only change Go code when the engine needs a reusable behavior that the declarative model cannot express. Add a dedicated Go engine only when the shared behavior-defined runtime cannot run the engine at all. | Need | Implementation | |---|---| | Existing behaviors are sufficient | Add an imported shared engine definition | | A reusable declarative behavior is missing | Extend the definition model and behavior-defined runtime | | The shared runtime is fundamentally unsuitable | Add a dedicated Go engine and register it | The relevant implementation is in: - `pkg/workflow/engine_definition.go` for the definition model and catalog - `pkg/workflow/behavior_defined_engine.go` for the shared runtime - `pkg/workflow/engine_definition_loader.go` for embedded built-in definitions - `pkg/workflow/agentic_engine.go` for dedicated Go engine registration - `pkg/parser/schemas/main_workflow_schema.json` for the workflow schema ## Study representative engines Read the closest examples before making changes: - `.github/workflows/shared/opencode.md`: npm installation, merged configuration, MCP, provider routing, and log parsing - `.github/workflows/shared/aider.md`: Python installation and a custom harness without native MCP - `.github/workflows/shared/crush.md`: native MCP configuration adapter and harness - `.github/workflows/shared/cursor.md`: plugin support - `.github/workflows/shared/deepseek-harness.md`: provider endpoint discovery and a headless profile Use the examples to identify a pattern, not as a reason to copy optional behaviors. ## Add a shared engine definition 1. Create `.github/workflows/shared/<engine>.md`. 2. Declare `engine.id`, `display-name`, `description`, `experimental`, provider metadata, authentication, and only the required `behaviors`. 3. Pin a default CLI version. Make installation deterministic and provide a verification command. 4. Document setup, authentication, model syntax, MCP support, and limitations in the Markdown body. Keep in-repository integrations clearly identified as unsupported samples. 5. Add the engine ID and shared definition path to `.github/aw/engines.json`. Imported behavior-defined engines are registered dynamically; do not add them to `NewEngineRegistry()`. 6. Add `.github/workflows/smoke-<engine>.md`, following the closest existing smoke workflow. Import the shared definition and exercise the capabilities the engine claims to support. 7. Update the unsupported sample table in `docs/src/content/docs/reference/engines.md`. 8. Add a changeset when the engine is a user-visible repository sample. New experimental engines have precedent as a `minor` change. 9. Run `make recompile` and include the generated smoke workflow `.lock.yml`. `TestKnownEngineImportsFile_MatchesSharedEngineFiles` in `pkg/workflow/engine_definition_test.go` enforces catalog coverage for shared external engines. ## Design the definition Keep the definition declarative and minimal: - Select the correct package manager, package name, binary name, version, and verification command under `behaviors.installation`. - Put invocation arguments and non-secret environment variables under `behaviors.execution`. - Use an existing secret strategy and provider environment mode where possible. - Declare native MCP support only when the CLI can consume the generated configuration. Otherwise use a harness or the gh-aw CLI proxy pattern. - Add only required default domains and map provider-specific domains under `behaviors.network.provider-domains`. - Declare manifest files, cache paths, and plugin support only when the CLI consumes them. - Add a log parser only when its emitted event format can be tested. Treat inline JavaScript in harnesses, configuration adapters, and log parsers as production code. Avoid shell interpolation, validate paths and child-process arguments, preserve nonzero exit codes, and never print secret values. Enabling package lifecycle scripts requires a pinned version and an explicit reason. For log and error regular expressions, also load `.github/skills/error-pattern-safety/SKILL.md`. ## Extend declarative infrastructure When an engine exposes a generally useful capability that existing behaviors cannot express: 1. Add the smallest field to the types in `pkg/workflow/engine_definition.go`. 2. Validate and render it in the focused behavior-defined engine files. 3. Update `pkg/parser/schemas/main_workflow_schema.json`. 4. Add focused tests for parsing, validation, and rendered execution behavior. 5. Run `make generate-schema-docs` when generated schema documentation changes. Do not add a schema field for a behavior that can be represented by existing installation, execution, environment, harness, or adapter fields. For a dedicated Go runtime, implement the engine interfaces by composing the existing helpers, keep engine-specific code in its own files, and register the engine in `pkg/workflow/agentic_engine.go`. Cover configuration, commands, environment, authentication, tools, logs, and failure handling with focused tests. ## Test the right layers Use tests that match the changed behavior: | Area | Tests and examples | |---|---| | Harness, configuration, MCP, and environment | `behavior_defined_engine_harness_test.go` | | Log parsing | `behavior_defined_engine_log_parser_test.go` | | Cache behavior | `behavior_defined_engine_cache_test.go` | | Definitions, catalog, and known imports | `engine_definition_test.go`, `engine_catalog_test.go` | | Embedded definitions | `engine_definition_loader_test.go` | | Real shared workflow harness | `aider_workflow_test.go` | | Sandboxed CLI visibility | `cloud_hypervisor_test.go` | | Generated smoke workflows | `compiled_lock_files_test.go` | Test both definition parsing and the generated installation/execution steps. Include negative cases for unsafe paths, invalid configuration, missing credentials, or malformed logs when relevant. ## Validate After Go changes: ```bash make build make fmt ``` After workflow Markdown changes: ```bash make recompile ``` Run focused `go test` commands for the changed behavior while iterating. Before an intermediate progress report, run: ```bash make agent-report-progress-no-test ``` Before the final progress report, run: ```bash make agent-report-progress ``` Use `make agent-finish` for the final repository validation when time allows. Do not trigger a smoke workflow from a Copilot cloud agent run. ## Completion checklist - The declarative path was preferred unless its limitations are documented. - The engine definition uses a pinned, verified installation. - Authentication, provider/model handling, MCP, and network access are covered. - Harnesses and adapters do not expose secrets or interpolate untrusted input. - `.github/aw/engines.json`, smoke workflow, generated lock file, documentation, and changeset are updated when applicable. - Focused tests cover parsing and rendered runtime behavior. - Repository validation passes.
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Posts are public.Sign in to post
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

