Write a verified-lead briefing

Turn a lead the user has already verified into a careful, citation-backed write-up.

Before writing — confirm verification

Do not write a brief on an unverified lead. Confirm with the user that they have:

• opened the source documents (the evidence links) and the figures/dates check out;
• considered the legitimate explanations (framework contract, emergency, distinct lots, per-patient medical supply — see docs/METHODOLOGY.md);
• a plan to seek right-of-reply from the authority and supplier.

If not, stop and route them back to investigate / the methodology.

Brief structure

1. Headline — neutral and factual ("X awarded Y N contracts totalling €Z, each under the €30k tender threshold"), never a verdict ("X is corrupt").
2. The pattern — what the data shows: counts, amounts, dates, the threshold, the signer.
3. The connections — supplier's other authorities, the official's network, owners (ΓΕΜΗ).
4. Evidence — a numbered list of the source decision/contract links (ADA/ADAM).
5. Caveats & open questions — what could legitimately explain it; what still needs checking.
6. Right-of-reply — note that comment was/should be sought.

Tone

• Leads, not accusations. Use "the records show", "appears", "warrants scrutiny" — not "proves" or "is guilty".
• Every factual claim carries its evidence link.
• Plain language; define Greek terms (κατάτμηση = contract-splitting; the ~€30k threshold).