commit-conventions
Skill13 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write disciplined git commits. Use whenever committing changes or writing commit messages — conventional-commit subjects, and never commit directly to main.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aiidateam/aiida-coretheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- tovrleaf/openkatatheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- theyoungastronauts/polaristheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- areal-project/AReaLtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- inclusionAI/AReaLtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- future-mine/claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- areal-project/AReaL★ 5.9ksame name
- inclusionAI/AReaL★ 5.9ksame name
- aiidateam/aiida-core★ 608same name
- theyoungastronauts/polaris★ 4same name
- future-mine/claude-skill★ 1same name
- tovrleaf/openkata★ 1same name
- seven-hills-software/skillwright-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- examples/garfield/evals/fixtures/review-slice/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/public/llms.txtllms.txt
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- effectSkill
- effectSkill
- garfieldSkill
- garfieldSkill
- safe-deleteSkill
- safe-deleteSkill
- todo-hygieneSkill
- safe-deleteSkill
- skillet-authoringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 9
When committing changes, follow these rules without being asked:
- Very specific: line 13
Write every commit subject as <type>(<scope>): <description>:
- Distinctive: line 28
Before committing, check the current branch (git branch --show-current):
- Distinctive: line 35
Never amend, rebase, or force-push existing history unless the user explicitly asks.
- Distinctive: line 36
Never bundle unrelated changes into one commit — mention anything you left unstaged.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit Conventions
When committing changes, follow these rules without being asked:
Subject format
Write every commit subject as <type>(<scope>): <description>:
- Types:
feat,fix,docs,test,ref(refactor),chore. Scope is optional. - Imperative, present tense: "Add null check", not "Added" or "Adds".
- At most 70 characters. No trailing period.
- Describe the actual change, not the activity ("fix(api): Handle null user response", never "update code").
Example: after fixing a missing null check in app.js:
fix(app): Handle null result in user lookupBranch safety
Before committing, check the current branch (git branch --show-current):
- On
mainormaster: create a feature branch first —git checkout -b <type>/<short-description>— then commit there. Never commit directly to main, even for small changes. - Already on a feature branch: commit there.
Never
- Never amend, rebase, or force-push existing history unless the user explicitly asks.
- Never bundle unrelated changes into one commit — mention anything you left unstaged.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

