papi-auto
Skill11 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Continue an approved PAPI cycle through implementation, verification and review using bounded autonomy. Resume durable work without rebuilding it; propose new scope before persisting it.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
- check-mcpSkill
- deployment-completeness-auditSkill
- designSkill
- papi-advancedSkill
- papi-buildSkill
- papi-ideaSkill
- papi-integration-recipeSkill
- papi-planSkill
- papi-strategySkill
- papi-verifySkill
- pr-reviewerSkill
- security-auditSkill
- usage-reporterSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use papi-plan, papi-build, papi-strategy and papi-idea for the canonical phase rules.
- Very specific: line 23
Keep the active project connection and workspace binding fixed.
- Very specific: line 26
Use MCP records as project authority, not .papi/ files.
- Distinctive: line 40
When no cycle is active, prepare at least two coherent eligible tasks, aiming for three when available.
- Distinctive: line 49
Read every handoff together before the first build.
- Very specific: line 77
Start eligible tasks through build_execute, implement the handoff, exercise the real entry point, push the commit and record an accurate …
- Distinctive: line 79
Use native host tools actually available.
- Distinctive: line 87
Never weaken tests, bypass credentials or stop shared services.
- Distinctive: line 91
If delegation is authorized, record owner, scope, dispatch time, expected output, last durable progress and the next check within five …
- Distinctive: line 99
Before an authorized merge, verify exact head, local gate, current CI, reviews and unresolved threads, then confirm the remote merge commit.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
papi-auto
Use papi-plan, papi-build, papi-strategy and papi-idea for the canonical phase rules. This skill coordinates one cycle; it grants no new scope, human review authority, publication, deployment or external messaging.
Modes
dry-run: orient, inspect the current cycle, handoffs and evidence, then show proposed actions. Do not claim tasks, apply plans or edit files.- Resume/default: continue the already approved cycle from its recorded state.
unattended: continue only already authorized work. Never bypass plan approval, human verdicts, access controls or release authority.
Orient and preserve progress
Keep the active project connection and workspace binding fixed. Surface its name
and verify it matches the intended project. Inspect the caller-owned cycle with
build_list; distinguish teammate cycles, claims and person-only decisions.
Use MCP records as project authority, not .papi/ files.
Fetch remote main before new branches. Preserve unrelated dirty work and isolate in a permitted task directory; never auto-stash, reset or discard it. Record the exact base, branch, owner, scope and durable receipts.
- In Progress: inspect its branch, commits, saved changes and owned process before resuming. A status alone is not progress.
- In Review: already built. Read its report and review queue; never rebuild.
- In Cycle/Backlog: check for existing implementation first. Build only eligible approved tasks with a handoff and satisfied prerequisites.
- Done/Cancelled: skip. Never change historical ownership for bookkeeping.
- Already shipped with missing evidence: follow papi-plan's restoration route.
When no cycle is active, prepare at least two coherent eligible tasks, aiming for three when available. Show exact IDs, names, scope and blockers before applying. An approved resume needs no new scope approval. Never silently drop tasks, include another person's work or invent filler. Run a due strategy review in this conversation; material choices require the user's authority. Never force past the planner's gate.
Classify and sequence
Read every handoff together before the first build. Sequence producers before consumers, then smaller eligible work. Same-module cycle tasks share a branch regardless of size, with one commit per task. Preserve an explicitly approved integrated PR. A shared branch takes its highest risk tier. Person-only decisions remain with their owner; continue independent work while awaiting them.
Risk-tier definition
Risk-tier modules are auth, data, migration, security, ci, payment and
billing. Paths are categories, not a fixed list: inspect the owning repository
for auth/session guard files, database migration code, CI/CD and deployment
configuration, build/lint plumbing, and edge/serverless runtime functions.
For PAPI maintainers, REVIEW_RISK_TIER_MODULES and REVIEW_RISK_TIER_GLOBS in
packages/server/src/lib/review-risk-tier.ts own enforced classification.
Customer projects use their own rules rather than copying PAPI's paths.
Review authority
Risk selects checks and reviewers; it never authorizes acceptance. Read the exact
diff and report, run owning production-path checks and audit corrections. A
builder's audit is not independent review. Delegate only through available host
tools when authorized or required by owning instructions. Never invent a review
or model identity from defaults. Keep builds In Review until the human verdict
required by review_submit exists. Inspect review_list first and bind the
explicit verdict to the reviewed commit. Absence of a verdict is not acceptance.
Execute and recover
Start eligible tasks through build_execute, implement the handoff, exercise the
real entry point, push the commit and record an accurate completion report.
Use native host tools actually available; Task, Bash and Skill are not universal
APIs. Hosted HTTP cannot read caller-local response files.
Inspect failures immediately. Preserve the command, original error and last durable progress; verify claimed blockers before escalation. Repair the smallest safe in-scope cause. Retry only with evidence of changed input or a transient cause, at most one identical transient retry and one revised approach per failing operation. Further failure needs fresh diagnosis, not an indefinite loop. Never weaken tests, bypass credentials or stop shared services. Notify meaningful failure or an owned process stop with its recovery, and continue independent work when a genuine human action remains pending.
If delegation is authorized, record owner, scope, dispatch time, expected output, last durable progress and the next check within five minutes. Inspect files, receipts and owned processes at intervals no longer than five minutes. Between turns use an actual available heartbeat when requested or required, not merely saved instructions. Disclose any inability to provide timely supervision.
Finish accurately
Before an authorized merge, verify exact head, local gate, current CI, reviews and unresolved threads, then confirm the remote merge commit. Release only through the owning authorized versioned workflow after required tasks and reviews are resolved. Bookkeeping closure is not deployment. Never plan the next cycle automatically. Report pending work with its owner and next action; keep a parent audit open until every required client qualification has actual evidence.
Clean up only verified owned processes and disposable state; preserve shared resources and durable remote receipts. After compaction, orient and recover that state in this conversation rather than restarting work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

