agentleFS
getedgehqgetedgehq/skills/abel-sell-the-alpha/SKILL.md

abel-sell-the-alpha

Skill5 starsChanged 11 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Build an account-specific enterprise sales brief using Jen Abel's buyer-advantage method. Use for founder-led discovery, executive outreach, design partnerships, deal framing, pricing, procurement, or sales handoff.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Choose the sales motion: Use references/method.md to distinguish a low-touch business from enterprise selling.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Co-author the commercial frame: Use references/method.md to connect price, access, scope, value, and expansion.

    line 35
  3. Distinctive:

    Build the buying path: Use references/method.md to map procurement, Finance, IT, Legal, approval timing, champion participation, and …

    line 37

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Sell the Alpha, Not the Feature

Based on Jen Abel's public method. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Jen Abel.

When to use

Use this skill to prepare or improve an enterprise sales opportunity for a named product and buyer. It fits founders finding their first commercial entry point, teams moving from small business customers into enterprise, and sellers growing an established enterprise motion. Abel's later interview focuses on approximately $1 million to $10 million ARR; her earlier work supplies the discovery practices needed before that stage. [S2] [S3]

The deliverable is an account-specific sales brief: buyer advantage, evidence of priority, outreach, discovery and demonstration plan, engagement choice, commercial frame, procurement path, and next decision. Adapt the emphasis to the assignment. A stalled deal needs diagnosis; an untouched account needs a hypothesis and discovery agenda. Include hiring analysis only when handoff or scaling is in scope.

These steps and worksheets synthesize the public method. They are not an official Abel framework. Treat account facts as supplied evidence, proposed advantages as hypotheses, and illustrative numbers as assumptions. Never manufacture research, buyer commitments, savings, product capabilities, or contract acceptance. Read references/sources.md when verifying attribution; public host summaries and transcript reproductions have different evidentiary weight from Abel's own articles.

Procedure

  1. Frame the assignment. Record product maturity, revenue motion, existing wins, account, buyer role, intended output, and current obstacle. Open templates/output-template.md and populate the context fields. Mark missing facts as unknown and continue with explicitly labeled assumptions where useful.
  2. Choose the sales motion. Use references/method.md to distinguish a low-touch business from enterprise selling. Resolve a mid-market label into actual buying behavior. Treat a new enterprise segment as new discovery even when the company already has small business revenue. [S2]
  3. Narrow the hypothesis and account. Define one customer type, accountable role, and contained unmet need using references/method.md. Consider category leaders on evidence of willingness to experiment. Map executive sponsorship and implementation responsibility separately. [S2] [S3]
  4. Draft the buyer's alpha. State their present capability, the future advantage, and the distinctive mechanism that bridges them. Use references/method.md and examples/worked-examples.md. Make the advantage meaningful enough for a champion to defend internally and identify what must be validated. [S1] [S2]
  5. Earn a relevant conversation. Draft three or four outreach sentences around role relevance, a useful insight, and a small invitation. Follow references/method.md. Use a verified observation or an openly stated hypothesis; do not disguise conjecture as proprietary knowledge. [S6]
  6. Discover priority before demonstrating. Apply references/method.md: investigate prior attempts, measurement, ownership, and willingness to act. Explain contradictions and revise the hypothesis. If a demo follows, show only the capabilities connected to the buyer's confirmed concerns. [S3] [S6]
  7. Decide whether to advance. Seek a specific next conversation during the call, record the unresolved question, and select advance, reframe, nurture, or stop. Use the evidence fields in templates/output-template.md. Politeness without commitment is a qualification warning, not automatic disqualification. [S2] [S6]
  8. Choose the engagement. Consult references/method.md to distinguish collaborative learning from evaluation of a built product. Specify limitations, participation, boundaries, and conversion criteria. Keep design partners within a consistent customer profile. [S5]
  9. Co-author the commercial frame. Use references/method.md to connect price, access, scope, value, and expansion. Explain introductory terms and future expectations. Evaluate a contained service entry when appropriate, with an explicit product destination. [S2]
  10. Build the buying path. Use references/method.md to map procurement, Finance, IT, Legal, approval timing, champion participation, and financial evidence. Requalify disengaged sponsorship or an unexplained RFP. Flag legal interpretation for counsel. [S8]
  11. Assess handoff when relevant. Apply references/method.md to test whether a non-founder can generate and close opportunities. Identify the learning still held by the founder before recommending additional sales leadership. [S7]
  12. Review and deliver. Complete checklists/review-checklist.md, revise failed items, and deliver the filled brief from templates/output-template.md. Include a clear next decision, owner, evidence required, and target date. These action fields are packaging conventions, not claims about Abel's published process.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md: Entry point, activation guidance, and the agent's main loop.
  • references/method.md: Detailed principles, decision rules, edge cases, and attributed warnings.
  • references/sources.md: Eight fetched public sources, provenance, and citation key.
  • examples/worked-examples.md: Two invented illustrations with weak drafts, revised briefs, and rule notes.
  • templates/output-template.md: Fill-in sales brief with guidance for every field.
  • checklists/review-checklist.md: Pass/fail review criteria and failure-mode repairs.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.