KB Conventions

Canonical rules for the agent-knowledge repository. Every document written into the KB must follow these conventions so claims remain traceable and cross-skill-consistent.

Directory layout

<topic>/
  sources/
    <slug>/
      original.pdf        # Raw input (PDF, HTML snapshot, etc.)
      extracted.md        # Text output from pdf-parse — kept under git
      source.md           # llm-wiki page (paper.json schema) — source metadata + claims
  analysis/
    README.md             # Index of all analyses for this topic
    <slug>.md             # Per-source structured analysis
  drafts/                 # WIP integration notes, large synthesis tasks in progress
  synthesis/              # Authoritative KB documents for this topic

One subdirectory per source under sources/ — keeps original, extracted text, and wiki metadata co-located and traceable.

source.md template

Create sources/<slug>/source.md when acquiring a new source. Populate known fields immediately; update claims and concepts after analysis.

---
title: "<Paper Title>"
type: paper
summary: "<one-line scope>"
tldr: "<one-sentence key takeaway — fill after reading>"
status: draft
last_updated: "<YYYY-MM-DD>"
tags:
  - <lowercase-hyphenated>
read_when:
  - <when is this source the right thing to reach for>
sources: []          # slugs of papers this source cites (surveys, etc.)
concepts: []         # slugs of synthesis/ pages this source informs — fill after analysis
confidence: 0.5      # raise toward 1.0 as claims are verified
claims: []           # fill after analysis — see claim schema below
---

Valid type values: paper, article, documentation, clipping, transcript, note, data, book-chapter, thread.

Claim schema

Each entry in claims corresponds to a key finding. Confidence maps from annotation markers:

claims:
  - text: "<factual statement>"
    confidence: 0.9
    source: "<slug>"
    section: "§2.3"

Confidence annotation

Every non-trivial claim in a KB document carries one marker:

Absence is data — always record when a source does not address a topic.

∅ in table cells: if a ∅ shorthand appears inside a table cell, also add a standalone blockquote immediately after the table:

> ∅ NOT FOUND IN SOURCES: <which sources checked, what topic>

The table cell alone is not sufficient — the standalone blockquote is required.

KB divergence markers

Use these when a claim intersects with existing KB content:

Analysis frontmatter schema

Every file in <topic>/analysis/ must begin with:

---
title: "Analysis: <Document Title>"
type: note
summary: "<one-line summary>"
read_when:
  - <condition under which this analysis is the right thing to read>
status: active
last_updated: "<YYYY-MM-DD>"
source: "sources/<slug>/original.pdf"
---

Critical: type: note is required — the wiki indexer silently skips pages without it.

Analysis index

<topic>/analysis/README.md is a flat index of all analyses for a topic. Each entry: one line — title, source slug, one-sentence summary. Create it if absent. Update it whenever a new analysis is added.

Writing quality

Apply anti-slop skill before writing any synthesis/, analysis/, or drafts/ document. Structural rules, slop-pattern detection, and self-audit checklist are defined there.

Synthesis impact assessment

After writing or updating an analysis, check existing <topic>/synthesis/ documents:

• Does this source introduce concepts not yet in the synthesis? Flag ✦ NEW
• Does it contradict or refine existing claims? Flag ⚠ DIVERGES FROM KB
• Is it silent on key synthesis topics? Flag ∅ NOT FOUND IN SOURCES

If impact is significant:

• Small addition → update the synthesis document directly
• Large integration → create a draft in <topic>/drafts/ documenting the work needed