paper-read
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Read one or more papers from the garden by their pg-YYYY-xxxxx IDs. Answer questions using the wiki first, then extracted full text as needed. Optionally propose wiki patches.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DaeSeokSong/oh-my-ouroborostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Calix-L/awesome-latex-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
- ZeyuLing/research_autocode_skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 28, 2026
- andrehuang/researcher-packtheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Calix-L/awesome-latex-skills★ 182same name
- andrehuang/researcher-pack★ 50same name
- ZeyuLing/research_autocode_skills★ 9same name
- DaeSeokSong/oh-my-ouroboros★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- paper-gardenSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when the user wants to ask a question about one or more specific papers already ingested into the Paper Garden.
- Very specific: line 19
Run from the paper-garden repository root.
- Distinctive: line 34
Keep the resolved papers in a list, preserving the order the user gave.
- Distinctive: line 45
Read only the sections you need.
- Distinctive: line 46
Only escalate to full text for papers that actually need it — do not read every paper's full text unless the question requires it.
- Distinctive: line 73
Never auto-apply. Never chain multiple updates in one confirmation.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Paper Read
Use this skill when the user wants to ask a question about one or more specific papers already ingested into the Paper Garden.
$ARGUMENTS is <paper_id> [<paper_id> ...] <question>. Examples:
- Single:
pg-2024-00005 What kernel does the paper use? - Multiple:
pg-2024-00005 pg-2023-00008 Compare their assumptions about order flow.
Parse $ARGUMENTS as follows: split on whitespace; consume leading tokens that match ^pg-\d{4}-[0-9a-f]{5}$ as the paper ID list; the remainder (joined with single spaces) is the question. At least one ID is required.
Prerequisites
Run from the paper-garden repository root. Shared configuration lives at skills/paper-garden/paper_garden.toml (same file used by the paper-garden ingest skill).
Workflow
Step 1: Locate (per ID)
For each parsed paper ID, run:
uv run python skills/paper-read/scripts/locate.py <paper_id> --config skills/paper-garden/paper_garden.toml- Non-zero exit for any ID: tell the user
paper id '<paper_id>' not found — check spelling or that ingest completed. If some IDs resolved and others failed, report which failed and ask whether to proceed with the resolved subset or stop. - Success: the script prints JSON. Save
paper_dir,wiki_path,extracted_markdown,title,tags,yearfor that ID.
Keep the resolved papers in a list, preserving the order the user gave.
Step 2: Read each wiki
For each resolved paper, read its wiki_path in full. This is mandatory and cheap. Do not skip to full text.
Step 3: Answer or escalate
- If the wikis together answer the question: respond directly, citing the relevant sections and noting which paper each point came from (use title or ID).
- If a wiki is insufficient for the part of the question that concerns that paper: read its
extracted_markdown.- For long papers, use
grepor section anchors to find relevant passages instead of reading the whole file. - Read only the sections you need. Stop reading once you have enough to answer.
- Only escalate to full text for papers that actually need it — do not read every paper's full text unless the question requires it.
- For long papers, use
- If
extracted_markdownis missing on disk: tell the user that paper was ingested without extraction and offer to re-run/paper-gardenon its source.
Step 4: Optional wiki update (patch flow)
While reading a full text, if you notice a factual error or a meaningful gap in that paper's wiki relevant to the user's question:
- Identify the exact snippet in
wiki.mdthat is wrong or incomplete. - Draft a replacement snippet.
Present both to the user side by side:
Proposed wiki update in <wiki_path>: - Original: <exact original text> + Replacement: <proposed replacement> Apply? (yes / edit / skip)- On
yes, apply the change with theEdittool using the exact original text asold_stringand the replacement asnew_string. Do NOT rewrite the whole wiki. Do NOT apply without explicit confirmation. - On
edit, let the user amend the replacement, then re-confirm. - On
skip, proceed without changes.
Never auto-apply. Never chain multiple updates in one confirmation.
Confirm each update separately — do not batch multiple patches across papers into one confirmation.
Step 5: Report
For each paper, summarize:
- Title and ID
- What was read (wiki only, or wiki + full-text sections X/Y)
- Any wiki updates applied, with the
wiki_path
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

