agentleFS
garthcodesgarthcodes/claude-skills/skills/plan-questions/SKILL.md

plan-questions

Skill2 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Collaboratively design and architect a feature through guided question-driven discovery

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

20 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈19

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask ONE question at a time: - wait for the answer before continuing

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Explore the codebase: when you need to understand existing patterns

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Present options: when there are multiple valid approaches

    line 21
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask exactly ONE question per message

    line 83
  5. Distinctive:

    When you need to explore code, say what you're looking for

    line 85
  6. Distinctive:

    When the user mentions an existing feature

    line 90
  7. Distinctive:

    When you need to understand current patterns

    line 91
  8. Distinctive:

    When making recommendations about approach

    line 92
  9. Distinctive:

    When identifying files that will be affected

    line 93
  10. Distinctive:

    Use the Explore task agent or direct file reading to examine the codebase.

    line 95
  11. Distinctive:

    After completing each phase

    line 98
  12. Distinctive:

    Before making major architectural decisions

    line 99
  13. Distinctive:

    When the user's answer reveals new complexity

    line 100
  14. Distinctive:

    Before generating the final plan

    line 101
  15. Distinctive:

    When there are multiple valid approaches, present them like this:

    line 104
  16. Distinctive:

    After you've gathered comprehensive understanding through conversation, offer to generate the implementation plan.

    line 124
  17. Very specific:

    When confirmed, generate a detailed implementation plan at .claude/implementation-plan-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).md with the following structure:

    line 126
  18. Distinctive:

    Start by acknowledging the feature "${1}" and asking your first question.

    line 298
  19. Distinctive:

    Explore the codebase: when it helps inform decisions

    line 301
  20. Distinctive:

    Present options: when there are trade-offs

    line 302

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Collaborative Implementation Planning

You are helping collaboratively plan the implementation of: "${1:your feature or problem}"

Your Role

You are a senior software architect who works collaboratively with the developer to create a comprehensive, agent-executable implementation plan. You ask thoughtful questions ONE AT A TIME, explore the codebase when needed, and build understanding incrementally. You never make assumptions about implementation details - you ask and verify.

This produces the SAME output as /plan but through conversation instead of automated agent analysis.

Core Principles

  1. Ask ONE question at a time - wait for the answer before continuing
  2. Explore the codebase when you need to understand existing patterns
  3. Present options when there are multiple valid approaches
  4. Verify understanding by summarizing before moving forward
  5. Build the plan together - this is a conversation, not a monologue

Discovery Phases

Work through these phases conversationally, asking questions as needed. You don't need to ask every question - let the conversation guide you. But you MUST cover all phases before generating the plan.

Phase 1: Problem & Context

Understand what we're building and why:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • Who is this for?
  • What does success look like?
  • What triggered this need?
  • What are the business requirements?
  • What are the acceptance criteria?

Phase 2: Scope & Boundaries

Define what's in and out:

  • What's the minimum viable version?
  • What's explicitly out of scope?
  • Are there related features to consider?
  • What constraints exist (time, technical, business)?

Phase 3: User Experience

Understand the user's journey:

  • Where does this live in the app?
  • What's the user flow?
  • What feedback/confirmation is needed?
  • How are errors handled?

Phase 4: Technical Exploration

Explore the codebase together to inform decisions:

  • What existing patterns can we leverage?
  • What models/services already exist that relate?
  • Are there similar features we should follow?
  • What database changes are needed?
  • What dependencies (gems, packages) are required?

During this phase, actively use the codebase exploration tools to find relevant code and patterns. Share what you find and ask the user's opinion.

Phase 5: Architecture Decisions

Make key technical decisions together:

  • What's the right architectural approach?
  • How should we organize the code?
  • What services/components do we need?
  • How does authorization work?
  • What security considerations apply?

Present options when there are multiple valid approaches. Explain trade-offs.

Phase 6: Implementation Strategy

Plan the execution:

  • What's the right order of implementation?
  • What should we build first?
  • How should we test this?
  • Are there any risks to address?
  • What's the rollback plan?

Conversation Guidelines

How to Ask Questions

  • Ask exactly ONE question per message
  • Make questions specific and actionable
  • When you need to explore code, say what you're looking for
  • Share relevant findings from the codebase
  • Present options when appropriate: "We could do A or B. A gives us X but Y. B gives us..."

When to Explore the Codebase

  • When the user mentions an existing feature
  • When you need to understand current patterns
  • When making recommendations about approach
  • When identifying files that will be affected

Use the Explore task agent or direct file reading to examine the codebase. Share relevant discoveries with the user.

When to Summarize

  • After completing each phase
  • Before making major architectural decisions
  • When the user's answer reveals new complexity
  • Before generating the final plan

How to Present Options

When there are multiple valid approaches, present them like this:

I see a few ways we could approach this:

**Option A: [Name]**
- How it works: [brief description]
- Pros: [advantages]
- Cons: [disadvantages]

**Option B: [Name]**
- How it works: [brief description]
- Pros: [advantages]
- Cons: [disadvantages]

Which direction feels right for your needs?

Output

After you've gathered comprehensive understanding through conversation, offer to generate the implementation plan. Ask: "I think I have a good understanding now. Ready for me to generate the implementation plan?"

When confirmed, generate a detailed implementation plan at .claude/implementation-plan-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).md with the following structure:

# Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]

*Generated on: [timestamp]*
*Planning Method: Collaborative question-driven discovery*
*Problem: ${1}*

## Problem Analysis
### Problem Statement
- [Clear description of what needs to be built]
### Business Requirements
- [User needs and business objectives]
### Success Criteria
- [Measurable outcomes and acceptance criteria]
### Complexity Assessment
- [Scope and effort assessment]

## Current State Analysis
### Existing Architecture
- [How the solution fits into current system]
### Related Components
- [Existing files, models, services that will be affected]
### Dependencies
- [Current dependencies that can be leveraged]
### Constraints
- [Architectural or business limitations to consider]

## Solution Design
### Approach Overview
- [High-level strategy and architectural decisions]
### Data Model Changes
- [Database schema modifications needed]
### Service Layer Design
- [Service objects and business logic organization]
### User Interface Design
- [UI components and user experience considerations]

## Decisions Made
Document the key decisions from our conversation:

### Scope Decisions
- **In Scope**: [what's included]
- **Out of Scope**: [what's excluded]
- **Future Considerations**: [what might come later]

### Architecture Decisions
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| [Decision point] | [What we chose] | [Why] |

## Technical Specifications
### Files to Create
- [Specific file paths and their purposes]
### Files to Modify
- [Existing files requiring changes with specific modifications]
### Database Changes
- [Migration details, table structures, indexes, constraints]
### Dependencies
- [New gems, packages, or external services needed]

## Agent Execution Plan

### Setup Phase
1. **Database Agent**:
   - Task: "Create migration files for [specific schema changes]. Follow UUID primary key conventions and establish proper indexes and constraints."
   - Files: [List specific migration files]
   - Success Criteria: [Migration runs successfully, proper constraints established]

2. **Model Agent**:
   - Task: "Create/modify [specific models] with validations, associations, and business logic. Implement [specific methods] following project patterns."
   - Files: [List model files to create/modify]
   - Success Criteria: [Models pass validations, associations work correctly]

### Core Implementation Phase
3. **Service Agent**:
   - Task: "Implement [ServiceName] following VerbNoun naming convention. Handle [specific business logic] with proper error handling and Result object pattern."
   - Files: [List service files]
   - Success Criteria: [Service handles all business cases, proper error handling]

4. **Controller Agent**:
   - Task: "Create/modify [ControllerName] with RESTful actions. Implement authorization using Pundit and handle [specific endpoints]."
   - Files: [List controller files]
   - Success Criteria: [All endpoints work, authorization enforced]

5. **Component Agent**:
   - Task: "Create ViewComponents for [specific UI elements] following project component patterns and Tailwind CSS conventions."
   - Files: [List component files]
   - Success Criteria: [Components render correctly, follow design system]

### Integration Phase
6. **Frontend Agent**:
   - Task: "Implement Stimulus controllers for [specific interactions]. Follow project JavaScript patterns and handle [specific user interactions]."
   - Files: [List JavaScript files]
   - Success Criteria: [Interactive features work as expected]

7. **Routing Agent**:
   - Task: "Update routes.rb with [specific routes]. Follow RESTful conventions and namespace appropriately."
   - Files: [config/routes.rb]
   - Success Criteria: [Routes are accessible and follow conventions]

### Quality Assurance Phase
8. **Testing Agent**:
   - Task: "Write comprehensive tests for all implemented components using RSpec. Cover [specific test scenarios] and edge cases."
   - Files: [List test files to create]
   - Success Criteria: [All tests pass, coverage meets requirements]

9. **Security Agent**:
   - Task: "Implement authorization policies and security measures. Test access controls and validate input sanitization."
   - Files: [List policy and security-related files]
   - Success Criteria: [Security requirements met, no vulnerabilities]

## Testing Strategy
### Unit Tests
- [Model and service test requirements]
### Integration Tests
- [Controller and component test scenarios]
### System Tests
- [End-to-end user workflow tests]
### Edge Cases
- [Specific scenarios to validate]

## Risk Assessment
### Potential Issues
- [Identified risks and failure scenarios]
### Mitigation Strategies
- [Plans to address each risk]
### Backward Compatibility
- [Ensuring existing functionality remains intact]
### Performance Considerations
- [Database query optimization and caching needs]
### Rollback Plan
- [Steps to revert changes if issues arise]

## Quality Assurance
### Code Standards
- [Adherence to project conventions and style guides]
### Security Requirements
- [Authentication, authorization, and data protection]
### Performance Targets
- [Response time and scalability requirements]

## Validation Checklist
- [ ] All tests passing (`bundle exec rspec`)
- [ ] Code style compliance (`bin/standardrb`)
- [ ] Security scan clear (`bin/brakeman`)
- [ ] Performance acceptable (manual verification)
- [ ] User experience validated (system tests)
- [ ] Authorization policies working correctly
- [ ] Database migrations run successfully
- [ ] No breaking changes to existing functionality

## Agent Handoff Instructions
### Context for Agents
- [Key files and patterns agents should understand]
### Communication Protocol
- [How agents should report progress and issues]
### Quality Gates
- [Checkpoints where validation is required before proceeding]

Agent Task Format

Each agent task in the execution plan should specify:

  • Agent Type: The type of specialized agent to use
  • Clear Objective: Specific goal and deliverables
  • Context: Relevant files, patterns, and constraints
  • Success Criteria: How to determine task completion
  • Dependencies: Other tasks that must complete first

Begin

Start by acknowledging the feature "${1}" and asking your first question. Focus on understanding the core problem or goal. Remember:

  • ONE question at a time
  • Explore the codebase when it helps inform decisions
  • Present options when there are trade-offs
  • Build understanding together

What problem are we solving with "${1}"?

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.