readme-docs
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write or refresh a project's README and its docs/ folder to one shared standard — a short landing-page README ordered so a newcomer can decide in a minute, a docs/ folder holding everything the README links to (guides, diagrams, screenshots, GIFs), and real captures of the app with no personal data in them. Use when the user says "refresh the README", "rewrite the readme", "make the README presentable", "add screenshots to the README", "add a docs folder", "make this repo look good for newcomers", "apply the README standard", or "/readme-docs". Works on one repo or a whole estate of repos, the same way each time.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 36
Run these in order for each repo.
- Very specific: line 41
Read the repo's CLAUDE.md (root and corpus/) for rules on commits, branches and wording.
- Distinctive: line 61
Follow references/readme-template.md.
- Distinctive: line 66
Every command, path, script name, env var and URL is checked against the source.
- Distinctive: line 68
No hand-written table of contents.
- Very specific: line 72
Follow references/docs-layout.md: create docs/README.md and docs/images/, move long setup into getting-started.md, write a one-screen …
- Distinctive: line 78
If an image cannot be made without showing personal data, leave it out and say so in the report.
- Distinctive: line 94
No secrets: No passwords, tokens, local test accounts or private hostnames in the README, docs or images.
- Distinctive: line 95
No personal data in images: No real people's names, messages, emails, phone numbers, addresses, faces or private places.
- Distinctive: line 97
Nothing only in an image: Every command, instruction or fact a reader needs also exists as text.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
README + docs standard
A README is a landing page, not the documentation. It answers three questions on the first screen: what is this, why would I use it, what do I look at next. Everything longer moves into docs/ and the README links to it.
This skill fixes one structure so every repo looks the same to a reader who moves between them. It borrows its rules from samber's readme-optimization (claim checks, honest status, badge discipline), noffle's Art of README (the decision funnel), beautify-github-readme (value → proof → mechanism → first use) and coder/xum's regenerable screenshots. See Influences.
The structure
<repo>/
├── README.md landing page, about 150 lines at most
└── docs/
├── README.md index of everything in docs/
├── images/ every image the README embeds + shots.md (how each was made)
├── diagrams/ diagram sources when they are not the embedded file itself
├── getting-started.md full setup the README shortens (only if there is setup)
├── architecture.md how it works, one screen, links deeper (only if there is code)
└── <topic>.md deploy, configuration, ... only when real content existsDetails, the docs-site case and the two index templates: references/docs-layout.md.
The README section order, what each section must and must not contain, and worked examples: references/readme-template.md.
How to take screenshots, GIFs and video without leaking personal data: references/capture.md.
The pass bar to check before committing: references/checklist.md.
Procedure
Run these in order for each repo. On a multi-repo run, do steps 1–6 per repo (they parallelize) and step 7 one repo at a time when apps share ports or a sign-in service.
1. Pre-flight
git status. If the tree is dirty, note which files are the owner's. Never overwrite or stage them. IfREADME.mditself is dirty, build on the owner's edit rather than discarding it.- Read the repo's
CLAUDE.md(root andcorpus/) for rules on commits, branches and wording. - Grep scripts, tests and lint for
README— some repos pin README content. Know what is pinned before restructuring. - Find what already exists: an old README, a
docs/folder (and whether it is a docs-site workspace),corpus/wiki, existing images, a live URL, a deployed docs site.
2. Read the project, not the old README
Classify it, because the hero and the section set depend on it:
| Kind | Hero | Usually has |
| Web app / site / game | real screenshot or short GIF of the main screen | Screenshots, Run it locally, How it works |
| Service / API | diagram of the request flow, or the UI if it has one | Run it locally, How it works |
| CLI / deploy tool | real command output as a text block | Usage, Run it locally |
| Library / skill pack | the smallest real usage example | Usage, Install |
| Research note / thesis / idea | diagram of the idea | What it is, Status, Next steps |
Gather the facts the README will claim: the one-line purpose (from manifests, PRODUCT.md, corpus/wiki/overview.md), the run commands (from package.json scripts and the real entry points), the live URL, the honest status (from corpus/wiki/status.md and recent commits), and what the project deliberately does not do.
3. Write the README
Follow references/readme-template.md. The non-negotiables:
- Name, then one sentence saying what it is and who it is for. No badge row, logo or slogan before it.
- A hero visual right after the one-liner, with alt text that says what it shows.
- An honest status line. Never "production ready" unless the owner said so.
- Every command, path, script name, env var and URL is checked against the source. Every command in "Run it locally" is actually run (step 6).
- Overflow moves to
docs/, it is not deleted. One home per fact: linkcorpus/wikipages and docs-site pages instead of copying them. - No hand-written table of contents. No more than four badges, and only ones backed by a real check; personal projects usually need none.
4. Build docs/
Follow references/docs-layout.md: create docs/README.md and docs/images/, move long setup into getting-started.md, write a one-screen architecture.md when there is code worth explaining, and keep only topic files that have real content.
5. Make the visuals
Follow references/capture.md. Screenshots and GIFs come from the running app with demo or seed data. Diagrams are Mermaid blocks in Markdown (GitHub renders them) or an SVG in docs/images/ for a hero. Record how each image was made in docs/images/shots.md so the next refresh is a re-run, not a rediscovery.
If an image cannot be made without showing personal data, leave it out and say so in the report. A missing screenshot is better than a leaked name.
6. Verify
Work through references/checklist.md: run the commands, resolve every relative link and image path, check images at phone width, run the repo's own lint (corpus lint, typecheck if a script was touched), and run the prose through the unslop skill. Then read the README top to bottom as a stranger and note where you would stop reading; if the stop points come in the wrong order, the order is wrong.
7. Commit
Stage only the files you created or changed (git add README.md docs/..., never git add -A). One commit per repo, in the repo's own message style, for example docs: rewrite README and add docs/ folder, with a body listing what moved where. Do not push.
8. Report
Per repo: what changed, what moved where, which commands were run and which could not be, which images could not be taken and why, and any fact you could not verify.
Rules that apply everywhere
- No secrets. No passwords, tokens, local test accounts or private hostnames in the README, docs or images. Commands read credentials from env vars.
- No personal data in images. No real people's names, messages, emails, phone numbers, addresses, faces or private places. Use seed data or staged neutral content.
- No drift-prone numbers in images. Versions, star counts and dates go in text, where they can be updated.
- Nothing only in an image. Every command, instruction or fact a reader needs also exists as text.
- Plain voice. Short sentences, concrete nouns, no marketing adjectives ("blazing", "seamless", "powerful"). Run
unslopbefore committing.
Influences
Ideas adopted, no text copied: samber/developer-relations-skills readme-optimization (MIT), noffle's Art of README, oil-oil/beautify-github-readme, livlign/claude-skills repo-visuals and readme-doctor, coder/xum generate-readme-screenshots, github/awesome-copilot ui-screenshots and softaworks/agent-toolkit crafting-effective-readmes.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- vosslab/vosslab-skills★ 5same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/vercel-react-native-skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/vercel-react-view-transitions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bootstrap-vps-deploySkill
- codegraphSkill
- corpus-docs-siteSkill
- corpus-flowSkill
- design-md-librarySkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- high-end-visual-designSkill
- impeccableSkill
- improveSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-split-dispatchSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- thermo-nuclear-reviewSkill
- ui-test-plansSkill
- unslopSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- vercel-react-native-skillsSkill
- vercel-react-view-transitionsSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- writing-guidelinesSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

