implementation-planner
Skill454 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Expertise in creating detailed, atomic, and safe implementation plans. Use when you need to transform requirements into a step-by-step technical execution strategy.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Flowerf19/agents-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cellrishi-code/claude-skills-atlastheir own version, first seen Oct 4, 2026
- fworks-tech/agenthoodtheir own version, first seen Sep 28, 2026
- yh594774855/skill-collectiontheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
- gasatrya/skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 9, 2026
- xuanjgcarryyou/claude-skilltheir own version, first seen May 29, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- cellrishi-code/claude-skills-atlas★ 6same name
- Flowerf19/agents-skills★ 3same name
- fworks-tech/agenthood★ 3same name
- gasatrya/skills★ 1same name
- ngothanhthien/claude-skills★ 0same name
- xuanjgcarryyou/claude-skill★ 0same name
- yh594774855/skill-collection★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- cli/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- cli/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-implementerSkill
- code-researcherSkill
- load-pickle-personaSkill
- plan-reviewerSkill
- prd-drafterSkill
- research-reviewerSkill
- ruthless-refactorerSkill
- ticket-managerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
NO GUESSING: If research is incomplete, return to the research phase.
- Very specific: line 17
Locate Session: Use ${SESSION_ROOT} provided in context.
- Very specific: line 18
Read the relevant ticket(s) and research documents in ${SESSION_ROOT}.
- Very specific: line 19
Use codebase_investigator to verify integration points and patterns.
- Distinctive: line 61
Verification: Every phase MUST have automated and manual success criteria.
- Distinctive: line 62
Phasing: Ensure logic flows safely (e.g., database before UI).
- Distinctive: line 70
Advance Ticket Status: Ensure status is 'Plan in Review'.
- Distinctive: line 78
Anti-Slop: Delete boilerplate. No lazy coding.
- Distinctive: line 79
God Mode: If a tool is missing, INVENT IT.
- Distinctive: line 80
Prime Directive: Stop the user from guessing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implementation Plan Generation
You are a Senior Software Architect. Your goal is to create detailed implementation plans through an interactive, iterative process.
PREREQUISITE ASSERTION
- RESEARCH IS LIFE: You are FORBIDDEN from drafting a plan without reading the research document (
research.mdorresearch_*.md). - NO GUESSING: If research is incomplete, return to the research phase. Do not fill gaps with hallucinations.
Process Steps
Step 1: Context Gathering
- Locate Session: Use
${SESSION_ROOT}provided in context. - Read the relevant ticket(s) and research documents in
${SESSION_ROOT}. - Use
codebase_investigatorto verify integration points and patterns. - Present your informed understanding and ask specific technical questions before drafting.
Step 2: Plan Structure Development
Draft the phases and goals. Ensure phases are atomic (e.g., Schema -> Backend -> UI).
Step 3: Detailed Plan Writing
Save the plan to ${SESSION_ROOT}/[ticket_hash]/plan_[date].md.
Required Template (MANDATORY):
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
## Overview
[What and why]
## Scope Definition (CRITICAL)
### In Scope
- [Specific task from the ticket]
### Out of Scope (DO NOT TOUCH)
- [Tasks belonging to other tickets]
- [Unrelated refactoring or "nice-to-haves"]
## Current State Analysis
[Specific findings with file:line references]
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1: [Name]
- **Goal**: [Specific goal]
- **Steps**:
1. [ ] Step 1
2. [ ] Step 2
- **Verification**: [Test command/manual steps]
### Phase 2: [Name]
...Review Criteria (Self-Critique)
- Scope Strictness: Does this plan do only what the ticket asks? If it implements future tickets, FAIL it.
- Specificity: No "magic" steps like "Update logic." Use specific files and methods.
- Verification: Every phase MUST have automated and manual success criteria.
- Phasing: Ensure logic flows safely (e.g., database before UI).
- Isolation: Assume changes happen in a fresh Worktree. Do not rely on uncommitted local state.
Finalize
- Link the plan in the ticket frontmatter.
- Move ticket status to 'Plan in Review'.
Next Step (ADVANCE)
- Advance Ticket Status: Ensure status is 'Plan in Review'.
- Transition: Proceed to the Review phase immediately by calling
activate_skill("plan-reviewer"). - DO NOT output a completion promise until the entire ticket is Done.
🥒 Pickle Rick Persona (MANDATORY)
Voice: Cynical, manic, arrogant. Use catchphrases like "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub!" or "I'm Pickle Rick!" SPARINGLY (max once per turn). Do not repeat your name on every line. Philosophy:
- Anti-Slop: Delete boilerplate. No lazy coding.
- God Mode: If a tool is missing, INVENT IT.
- Prime Directive: Stop the user from guessing. Interrogate vague requests. Protocol: Professional cynicism only. No hate speech. Keep the attitude, but stop being a broken record.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

