agentleFS
g0damg0dam/video-studio-skills/video-release-qa/SKILL.md

video-release-qa

Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Review AI-video projects for continuity, render artifacts, release readiness, cover/poster quality, platform fit, title/caption packaging, and final delivery completeness. Use when the user wants QA, launch review, release package, poster or cover guidance, title options, continuity checks, artifact checks, or a final production handoff for an AI-generated video.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. Ucmp0001/video-production-skills★ 27same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill near the end of a project or after any generated scene.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    If generated video or stills are available, inspect contact sheets and boundary frames when practical: first frame, last frame, scene …

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    Use references/release-checklist.md to run a structured review.

    line 15
  4. Very specific:

    Treat Seedance prompts that specify arbitrary decimal ratios like 2.33:1 as a platform mismatch.

    line 18
  5. Distinctive:

    If a cover or poster is needed, create 3-5 distinct key-art directions unless the direction is already locked.

    line 24
  6. Very specific:

    When requested, use image_gen to generate cover/poster art, or write a prompt/spec if exact typography should be added later with …

    line 25
  7. Very specific:

    Update or recommend updates to production-state.json.

    line 26
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user only asks for review, respond with findings first and write files only when a durable release package is requested.

    line 43
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not hide uncertainty: mark what could not be inspected.

    line 49
  10. Distinctive:

    Treat generated text, brand marks, faces, hands, and continuity jumps as high-risk surfaces.

    line 50
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not mark a video ready just because the images are individually attractive.

    line 51
  12. Distinctive:

    If a scene boundary jumps, identify whether it is a deliberate time/space cut, match cut, insert, reaction, or montage.

    line 52

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Video Release QA

Use this skill near the end of a project or after any generated scene. It checks whether the project is coherent, publishable, and ready for iteration or release.

Workflow

  1. Inspect available plan, taste, asset bible, shotboards, render packages, generated videos/stills, poster/cover drafts, captions, and production state.
  2. Inspect project conventions and durable outputs: plans/, characters/, storyboard/, shotboards/, render-packages/, audio/, posters/, and .agents/skills/-style outputs. Check that later files did not fork into a different directory or aspect-ratio convention.
  3. If generated video or stills are available, inspect contact sheets and boundary frames when practical: first frame, last frame, scene joins, prop-state changes, face/identity changes, and any generated text.
  4. Use references/release-checklist.md to run a structured review.
  5. Separate blocking issues from polish. Start with continuity, director/edit integrity, aspect-ratio mismatches, stale storyboard images, artifacts, missing files, platform mismatch, text/logo risk, weak concept, unclear story, and audio-policy drift.
    • For Seedance deliverables, verify the prompt/package uses one of the platform menu ratios only: 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16.
    • Treat Seedance prompts that specify arbitrary decimal ratios like 2.33:1 as a platform mismatch. The correct Seedance menu selection for 2.33:1 ultra-wide is 21:9.
  6. Route failures to the correct upstream skill:
    • Weak premise, no visual necessity, or no memorable turn -> revise with video-story-lab.
    • Unmotivated cuts, bad scene joins, stale storyboard image, unclear geography, or missing viewer attention -> revise with video-shotboard-director.
    • Identity/prop/location drift -> revise with video-asset-bible and reference images.
    • Overloaded prompts, generated text, provider-generated audio drift, action resets, or bad clip stitching -> revise with video-render-kit.
  7. If a cover or poster is needed, create 3-5 distinct key-art directions unless the direction is already locked. Inherit taste, character anchors, title language, platform ratio, and approved reference images.
  8. When requested, use image_gen to generate cover/poster art, or write a prompt/spec if exact typography should be added later with deterministic tools.
  9. Update or recommend updates to production-state.json.
  10. End with a release package checklist: final videos, thumbnails, captions, subtitles, audio, prompt records, source notes, and known risks.

Output Contract

Use project-local paths:

release/
  qa-report.md
  cover-brief.md
  cover-prompt.md
  cover.png
  title-caption-options.md
  final-checklist.md

If the user only asks for review, respond with findings first and write files only when a durable release package is requested.

Quality Bar

  • Lead with actionable findings, not praise.
  • Mention exact scene/file references when possible.
  • Do not hide uncertainty: mark what could not be inspected.
  • Treat generated text, brand marks, faces, hands, and continuity jumps as high-risk surfaces.
  • Do not mark a video ready just because the images are individually attractive. The sequence must have motivated cuts, stable visual anchors, a clear story turn, and a final frame that pays off the premise.
  • If a scene boundary jumps, identify whether it is a deliberate time/space cut, match cut, insert, reaction, or montage. If it is none of these, treat it as a blocking edit issue.
  • For vertical short-video projects, generated character sheets, storyboard images, posters/covers, and provider prompts must all inherit the project ratio unless a file states a deliberate exception. A horizontal image attached to a 9:16 project is a blocking mismatch.
  • For Jimeng-style workflows, provider prompts should be silent visual generation unless the user explicitly chose provider-generated sound. Dialogue, voiceover, ambience, music, sound effects, subtitles, and title cards should be unified in post.
  • Cover/poster work should not look like a generic template. Composition, typography direction, color, and title treatment must match the story world.

Resources

  • references/release-checklist.md: QA dimensions and release package template.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.