agentleFS
fws94fws94/product9-token-saver/skills/issue-admin/SKILL.md

issue-admin

Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a user explicitly requests a read-only issue lookup or a narrowly scoped title, description, label, assignee, status or comment update on an identified issue.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If an assignee name has multiple matches, show stable account identifiers and ask the parent for a choice.

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Use one writer for an issue.

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not schedule monitors or infer completion.

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Explicit issue administration

This skill handles identified issue fields and explicitly requested comments only. It is separate from the luna-submit skill: read-only lookups use a direct authenticated provider tool; authorized writes use one gpt-6-luna worker at xhigh while the parent keeps its own model settings.

Before a write

  1. Resolve the provider, repository/project and exact issue identifier. Read the current issue and the provider's allowed fields/states.
  2. Build a packet naming exactly one requested field or comment and its value, excluded fields, current state, repository rules, evidence requirements and delegation_depth: 0. Group related fields only when the user explicitly names them together. Do not infer a title, label, assignee, state or completion from CI, tests or unrelated issue activity.
  3. For a description request, send only the description body. For a comment request, send only the exact comment body and no field changes. For title, label, assignee or status, send only that field. Preserve all other fields.
  4. If an assignee name has multiple matches, show stable account identifiers and ask the parent for a choice. If a requested state is unavailable or ambiguous, show the provider's choices and ask. A missing connector or unsupported write is blocked; do not install tools or substitute a label.

Read-back and uncertain writes

Use one writer for an issue. After a write, read back only the requested field and the issue identifier. A matching field is completed; an inaccessible target with other targets confirmed is partial. A timeout or ambiguous result requires a read-back by content, author and timing before retry. If the original write cannot be reconciled, return uncertain and do not create a duplicate comment or issue. The worker must not spawn another submission worker.

Return the shared worker packet with the provider action, requested field or comment, read-back evidence, status and remaining question. Keep response fields bounded and preserve permission errors as permission errors; they do not prove an issue is absent. The default write effort is xhigh; a later low-effort comparison requires an explicit preference change and is never implicit.

Do not schedule monitors or infer completion. Return semantic diagnosis, provider-specific state mapping and unresolved choices to the parent.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.