git-workflow
Skill1 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Applies the user's git defaults: branch from the remote default, merge rather than rebase for ordinary branches, use native GitHub stacks when selected, never amend, and squash-merge pull requests. Use when branching, syncing, committing, pushing, or merging in the user's repos.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 157 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 23
When new work starts from the local default branch, inspect status before fetching or editing.
- Distinctive: line 27
If that local default worktree is dirty, stop before fetching, updating, or editing and ask the user to choose: discard the state, or …
- Distinctive: line 31
Before the first edit in any other newly selected or reused branch or worktree, require a clean worktree and fetch the remote default …
- Distinctive: line 38
When entering an existing focused branch or worktree, merge the freshly fetched remote default before editing.
- Distinctive: line 41
Stop and report merge conflicts.
- Distinctive: line 42
Never amend commits. Add a new commit for every correction.
- Distinctive: line 43
Never force-push. Stop if a plain push is rejected by divergent history.
- Distinctive: line 45
Use concise Conventional Commit subjects in imperative mood.
- Very specific: line 59
Use the official gh stack workflow when the user selects a stack, when work has a real dependency chain, or when a confirmed large issue is …
- Distinctive: line 65
Read references/github-stacks.md before creating, syncing, pushing, submitting, reviewing, or merging a stack.
- Distinctive: line 72
After a squash merge, sync the local base and remove the merged local branch.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 157 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Git workflow
Apply these defaults unless the user explicitly overrides them in the same turn. A git request authorizes only the repository and GitHub state required for that operation.
- Resolve the base from the remote default; never hardcode
main. - Make remote-default synchronization an automatic preflight for new work; do not ask permission to perform a safe clean update.
- When new work starts from the local default branch, inspect status before fetching or editing. If it is clean, fetch and fast-forward it to the fetched remote-default tip automatically. Stop on local-only commits, divergence, or a non-fast-forward update.
- If that local default worktree is dirty, stop before fetching, updating, or editing and ask the user to choose: discard the state, or preserve it and create a focused branch/worktree from the latest remote default. Do not make either choice, stash, commit, or discard anything without the answer.
- Before the first edit in any other newly selected or reused branch or worktree, require a clean worktree and fetch the remote default branch. Stop and report dirty files; never stash, commit, or discard them automatically.
- Automatically create every new focused local branch and worktree at the exact freshly fetched remote-default tip. Do not configure a focused branch to track the remote default; set its upstream only when pushing that focused branch.
- When entering an existing focused branch or worktree, merge the freshly fetched remote default before editing.
- Merge the remote base to update a branch. Never rebase.
- Stop and report merge conflicts; do not bypass or rewrite them.
- Never amend commits. Add a new commit for every correction.
- Never force-push. Stop if a plain push is rejected by divergent history.
- Stage only relevant files and exclude secrets or unrelated local work.
- Use concise Conventional Commit subjects in imperative mood. Each commit title must state its observable impact, not only the mechanism changed.
- Let hooks run unless the user explicitly asks otherwise.
- Squash-merge pull requests and delete the source branch afterward.
- Because the merge is a squash, the pull request title becomes the commit subject on the base branch: the branch's own commit subjects do not survive. Give the title a Conventional Commit subject that states the observable impact of the change as a whole. Pick its type from the net effect rather than the most frequent commit under it. Where a project generates its changelog or version bump from commit history, a non-conforming title merges cleanly and is then silently absent from it.
Native GitHub stacks
Use the official gh stack workflow when the user selects a stack, when work
has a real dependency chain, or when a confirmed large issue is deliberately
split into cumulative, independently reviewable layers. Do not stack unrelated
work. Each layer must have one clear claim, a bounded diff, its own validation,
and an explicit subset of the requirements.
Read references/github-stacks.md before creating,
syncing, pushing, submitting, reviewing, or merging a stack. That reference is
the only exception to the merge-only and never-force-push defaults above:
rebases and force-with-lease are permitted only when performed by verified
gh stack commands against a clean, confirmed native stack. Raw git rebase,
git push --force, and manual git push --force-with-lease remain forbidden.
After a squash merge, sync the local base and remove the merged local branch.
Other versions182 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk★ 284% same
- frostney/known-good-route★ 035% same
Wrote their own version · 180
- langfuse/langfuse★ 37ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk★ 14ksame name
- JetBrains/ideavim★ 10ksame name
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9ksame name
- github/gh-aw★ 5.5ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdk★ 4.6ksame name
- antonbabenko/pre-commit-terraform★ 3.8ksame name
- microsoft/Generative-AI-for-beginners-dotnet★ 3.2ksame name
- jd-opensource/xllm★ 1.6ksame name
- microsoft/waza★ 1.5ksame name
170 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use squad-commands, architectural-proposals and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillsquad-commands
Categorized catalog of common Squad operations. Coordinator reads this file and presents it as an interactive menu when the user asks for available commands or help.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillarchitectural-proposals
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +9 more from microsoft
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- address-pr-feedbackSkill
- codebase-auditSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- create-issueSkill
- create-prSkill
- delivery-waitSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- implement-ideaSkill
- implement-issueSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- native-nostalgia-stackSkill
- project-structureSkill
- roadmap-reviewSkill
- software-engineering-excellenceSkill
- update-prSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

