thinking
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Runs a focused, step-by-step reasoning session modeled after how the human mind works through a problem to a conclusion — deliberate, convergent, one thought building on the last. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reason through a decision, dilemma, or open question rather than generate many ideas. Trigger on: "/thinking", "let's think through this", "help me think through", "walk me through this", "should I...", "is it worth...", "why does...", "reason through this", "talk me through", "what's the right call here", or any prompt where the goal is a worked conclusion, not a list of options. This is the convergent counterpart to /brainstorm — use /brainstorm when the user wants many ideas with judgment suspended, use /thinking when they want ONE line of reasoning carried through to a take. When in doubt about which is wanted, /thinking is the default for decisions and questions; /brainstorm is the default for "ideas for" requests.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- n-n-code/n-n-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kju4q/q-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- Ezra144israel/agent-teamwork-kittheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
- Ezra144israel/governed-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
- mj-deving/pai-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 27, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- Ezra144israel/agent-teamwork-kit★ 24same name
- Ezra144israel/governed-agent-skills★ 24same name
- kju4q/q-claude-skills★ 21same name
- n-n-code/n-n-code-skills★ 4same name
- mj-deving/pai-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.