agentleFS
fritzprixfritzprix/libr-agent/.agents/skills/refactor-builtin-tool/SKILL.md

refactor-builtin-tool

Skill11 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub

Guide and principles for refactoring built-in MCP tools in LibrAgent. Use this skill when reviewing, refactoring, or optimizing existing built-in tools to reduce AI cognitive load, eliminate internal callback tool exposure, consolidate redundant tools, and ensure strict state synchronization across the system.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Hide Internal Callbacks: Never expose internal system callbacks or UI triggers (e.g., resumeFromWait, getUserAnswer, circuitBreak) to the …

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Concise Descriptions: Keep tool descriptions brief.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    Backend as Source of Truth: Do not rely on the frontend to fire asynchronous validation events.

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    No "Ghost" Entities: If a registered entity (like an external MCP server) lacks a cache due to a transient failure, it must still be …

    line 40
  6. Very specific:

    Consolidate Sibling Tools: Check for tools with similar prefixes (e.g., read_foo, read_bar) and combine them if their core intent is …

    line 57
  7. Distinctive:

    Check Handlers: Ensure handlers use central service functions instead of duplicating connection/execution logic.

    line 58
  8. Distinctive:

    Verify State Updates: Ensure any DB mutations happen _after_ successful synchronous verification.

    line 59

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Built-in Tool Refactoring Guide

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Refactoring existing built-in MCP tools in LibrAgent.
  • Reviewing tools that cause AI context bloat or "cognitive overload".
  • Consolidating redundant or overlapping tools (e.g., exportFile and exportZip).
  • Fixing issues where internal callback tools are exposed to the AI agent.

Core Design Principles

1. Context Economy & Cognitive Load

AI agents operate within strict context limits. Every exposed tool consumes tokens and attention.

  • Hide Internal Callbacks: Never expose internal system callbacks or UI triggers (e.g., resumeFromWait, getUserAnswer, circuitBreak) to the all_tools() export. The backend router (call_tool) can handle these without the AI needing to know they exist.
  • Concise Descriptions: Keep tool descriptions brief. Avoid paragraphs of prerequisites or error-handling advice. The schema itself should document parameters.
  • Progressive Disclosure: For discovery tools (like listTools), provide a compact summary (names only) when queried broadly. Show detailed schemas only when a specific, narrowed query is provided.

2. Consolidation & Auto-Switching

Reduce the sheer number of tools by combining highly similar operations into a single tool with smart, data-driven behavior.

  • Merge Sibling Tools: Combine tools that achieve the exact same goal (e.g., merging exportFile and exportZip into a single export tool that accepts an array of paths).
  • Data-Driven Logic: Let the backend determine the execution mode (e.g., if one file is passed -> export raw; if multiple files -> export as ZIP). The AI shouldn't have to make micro-decisions about file counts or formats.

3. Strict Synchronization & State Integrity

Data integrity must be guaranteed at the backend level.

  • Synchronous Verification: Whenever a tool or configuration is created or updated, the system must verify its validity synchronously before committing it to the database.
  • Backend as Source of Truth: Do not rely on the frontend to fire asynchronous validation events. If an entity is in the database, it must be verified and operational.
  • No "Ghost" Entities: If a registered entity (like an external MCP server) lacks a cache due to a transient failure, it must still be visible in tool listings with an appropriate warning, rather than being silently filtered out.

4. Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) in Integration

Built-in tools should leverage central architectures.

  • Use Central Managers: Reuse central components like MCPServerManager or McpServerService::verify_config instead of writing raw tokio::process::Command or HTTP clients inside specific tool handlers.
  • Single Source of Validation: Formulate validation logic in the core service layer and reuse it across UI endpoints, tool handlers, and agent routines.

5. Cross-Platform UX Considerations

  • Process Stealth: On Windows, always apply the CREATE_NO_WINDOW flag (0x08000000) when spawning background or verification processes via std::os::windows::process::CommandExt to prevent distracting terminal flashes.

Refactoring Workflow

  1. Audit tools.rs: Identify all tools exported via all_tools(). Remove any tool that is strictly an internal callback.
  2. Review Descriptions: Condense verbose descriptions in MCPTool definitions.
  3. Consolidate Sibling Tools: Check for tools with similar prefixes (e.g., read_foo, read_bar) and combine them if their core intent is identical.
  4. Check Handlers: Ensure handlers use central service functions instead of duplicating connection/execution logic.
  5. Verify State Updates: Ensure any DB mutations happen after successful synchronous verification.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.